Author Topic: Ki-61-2  (Read 519 times)

Offline Tatyu

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Ki-61-2
« on: September 11, 2001, 01:38:00 AM »
hiya  :)

I want Ki-61-2.

Everybody thinks what.

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Ki-61-2
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2001, 11:10:00 AM »
Me too.   :)

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
Ki-61-2
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2001, 12:40:00 PM »
Me 3.

Offline Vermillion

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4012
Ki-61-2
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2001, 12:59:00 PM »
I was hoping that we would get the Ki-61-II when it was first announced, but we got the much less capable model.

Me 4.

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Ki-61-2
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2001, 08:41:00 PM »
Yup :)

Offline Hobodog

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 423
      • http://www.military.com
Ki-61-2
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2001, 09:22:00 PM »
ME 5

Offline Fester'

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 336
Ki-61-2
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2001, 09:41:00 PM »
i want
ki100
ki43
ki44
ki84


sure ki61-2 also

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Ki-61-2
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2001, 12:10:00 AM »
whats the performance difference's between the model of tony we have and the KI-61-II?
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Ki-61-2
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2001, 12:41:00 AM »
Its probably just faster, better armed, and turns better.  Thats what most everyone wants.

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
Ki-61-2
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2001, 01:01:00 AM »
It's a little bit faster than a Ki-61-I, and a little heavier.  Otherwise it's about the same.  There were very very few of them built.  Most of the airframes ended up being converted to Ki-100s.  But I built a model of it once, so I like it.    :)
 http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/baugher_other/ki-61.html#RTFToC3

[ 09-13-2001: Message edited by: funkedup ]

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
Ki-61-2
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2001, 02:35:00 AM »
Ki-61-II Data by IJAAF

Engine:
Kawasaki HA-140
Take-off 1,500hp
Military 1,350hp @ 4,000m
         1,250hp @ 5,700m

   
Engine Performance Graph (Look at HA-140).

Weights:
Empty 2,855kg
Gross 3,825kg

Speed:
610km/h @ 6,000m
591km/h @ 8,000m
544km/h @ 10,000m

Climb - Ceiling:
Time to 5,000m 6'30" or 6'00"
Time to 10,000m 24'00"

Service ceiling 11,000m

Range:
600km with Internal Fuel.
1,600km with Internal Fuel & Drop Tanks

Armament:
2 Ho-5 20mm Cannons on Nose (250 Rds. each)
2 Ho-103 12.7mm MGs on Wing (250 Rds. each)

2 30kg - 250kg Bombs

[ 09-13-2001: Message edited by: Mitsu ]

Offline Fester'

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 336
Ki-61-2
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2001, 02:43:00 AM »
i would rather see ki100 honestly

Offline Mitsu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2763
      • Himitsu no blog (Mitsu's secret blog - written by Japanese)
Ki-61-2
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2001, 03:14:00 AM »
Ki-100-I Data

Engine:
Mitsubishi HA-112-II

Take-off 1,500hp (S.L)
Military 1,350hp/2,000m
   "     1,250hp/5,800m

 
Engine Performance Graph (Look at HA-112-II).

Weights:
Empty 2,525kg
Gross 3,495kg

Speed:
500km/h @ 1,000m
520km/h @ 2,000m
539km/h @ 3,000m
543km/h @ 3,210m
536km/h @ 4,000m
551km/h @ 5,000m
575km/h @ 6,000m
578km/h @ 6,140m
568km/h @ 7,000m
556km/h @ 8,000m
542km/h @ 9,000m
527km/h @ 10,000m
(IJA Official Data)

or

510km/h @ 1,000m
567km/h @ 5,000m
580km/h @ 6,000m
570km/h @ 8,000m
535km/h @ 10,000m
(Kawasaki Kokuki Official Data)

Cruise Speed 400km/h @ 4,000m

Take-off Speed:
132 - 135km/h (IAS)

Take-off Run:
271 - 356m

Landing Speed:
137 - 142km/h (IAS)

Landing Run:
674 - 780m

Climb - Ceiling:

Time to Altitude (ALT m /min,sec)
1,000m/1'12"
2,000m/2'13"
3,000m/3'08"
4,000m/4'29"
5,000m/6'00"
6,000m/7,26"
7,000m/8,56"
8,000m/10'47"
10,000m/20'00"
(IJA Official Data)

or

Time to Altitude (ALT m /min,sec)
5,000m/6'00"
8,000m/11'30"
10,000m/20'00"
(Kawasaki Kokuki Official Data)

Service Ceiling 11,700m

Range:
Internal Fuel - 1,400km
Internal Fuel & 2 Drop Tanks - 2,200km

Armament:
2 Ho-5 20mm Cannons on Nose (250 Rds. each)
2 Ho-103 12.7mm MGs on Wing (250 Rds. each)

2 250kg Bombs

Offline Eaglecz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 753
Ki-61-2
« Reply #13 on: September 14, 2001, 03:58:00 AM »
Japanes plane had lot of ammo ... how did they did it ?
any specification about Jap. 20 mm   ?

Offline Tatyu

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
I i....i I ga nai?
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2003, 02:06:17 AM »
PPPPPPPUNT!! :aok