Author Topic: First BCS of 2009  (Read 1332 times)

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
First BCS of 2009
« on: October 18, 2009, 05:35:19 PM »
Some teams i really want to know how they got there.  But glad to see #4 BSU, #5 Cincinnati, #6 Iowa and #8 TCU being recognized. 

Florida
Alabama
Texas
Boise St.
Cincinnati
Iowa
USC
TCU
LSU
Miami (FL)
Oregon
Georgia Tech
Penn St.
Virginia Tech
Oklahoma St.
BYU
Houston
Utah
Ohio St.
Pittsburgh
Wisconsin
Arizona
West Virginia
South Carolina
Kansas

Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline 68ZooM

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6337
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2009, 06:33:50 PM »
This means nothing, to early in the season to tell who's the best with Undefeated teams falling weekly, AP poll is a joke a 3-3 team makes top 25?, why not this one. Still think they need a better playoff system to determan who's really the Champs. Maybe something similar to the NFL.
UrSelf...Pigs On The Wing...Retired

Was me, I bumped a power cord. HiTEch

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #2 on: October 18, 2009, 07:38:18 PM »
This means nothing, to early in the season to tell who's the best with Undefeated teams falling weekly, AP poll is a joke a 3-3 team makes top 25?, why not this one. Still think they need a better playoff system to determan who's really the Champs. Maybe something similar to the NFL.

I agree with you on the playoff system.  Div II and III has it.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2009, 07:52:31 PM »
BCS = Bull Crap Series...

A playoff setup is badly needed.
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"

Axis vs Allies

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6590
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2009, 07:57:12 PM »
ROLL TIDE!!!






That's all I have to say
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Pannono

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2009, 07:59:19 PM »
Why the hell is U of A in there?
Pannono
Proud Member of Pigs On The Wing
8 Player H2H: 2006-07
MA Tours: 87, 97-113, 143-144, 160-Present
FSO: JG54

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #6 on: October 18, 2009, 09:17:34 PM »
Why the hell is U of A in there?

 That is curious. Arizona 4-2?

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #7 on: October 18, 2009, 11:07:02 PM »
That is curious. Arizona 4-2?

A lost against #21 UoG and OSU. Dam BSC system
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2009, 11:02:06 AM »
Iowa should be ahead of BSU and Cincy.   Alabama will alone on the Top soon.   The AP poll got it right.
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2009, 11:35:19 AM »
A lost against #21 UoG and OSU. Dam BSC system
  Arizona lost to Iowa and Washington. They do have (arguably) the best defensive secondary in the country. At the time Iowa played them their running back was the second leading rusher in the country. Enough for a 22 ranking?

  If a team can be ranked in the top five playing teams like Cal-Davis, Louisanna Tech, Bowling Green why not have Arizona in the top 25.

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2009, 12:03:20 PM »
  Arizona lost to Iowa and Washington. They do have (arguably) the best defensive secondary in the country. At the time Iowa played them their running back was the second leading rusher in the country. Enough for a 22 ranking?

  If a team can be ranked in the top five playing teams like Cal-Davis, Louisanna Tech, Bowling Green why not have Arizona in the top 25.

You made a good point.  I did not realized that UoA defensive is that good.  By next week, i am sure Iowa will past BSU and Cin to the #3 spot.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline avionix

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1088
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2009, 12:04:02 PM »
GO IOWA!!!
 :rock
treekilr in game.   
"Please. This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker and argue over who killed who..."

Offline shppr01

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2289
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #12 on: October 19, 2009, 03:13:52 PM »
YAAAA !!!! BOISE STATE
Ingame : Shipper

Never put your gun down to hug a grizzly.

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #13 on: October 19, 2009, 03:31:27 PM »
GO IOWA!!!
 :rock

Not a Gator or hurr fan? 

Yes, i am a buckeye fan.  Time they do something with Jim T.  Will not be surprise PSU and Iowa beating them.

I am enjoying BSU statues. Still a strong program. 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline alskahawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
Re: First BCS of 2009
« Reply #14 on: October 19, 2009, 04:38:45 PM »
 GO IOWA!!!
  
 Season long way from being over. Sensible Hawkeye fans are more concerned about Michigan State than any national implications.

  :salute Oakranger for admitting he's a OSU fan when they are down.