Author Topic: 109 trivia II (Read 361 times)

Jimdandy · « **on:** February 01, 2001, 12:51:00 PM »

What engine was the original prototype 109 designed to have installed in it. It was actually rated lower in horse power than the Rolls-Royce Kestrel that was first installed. The Kestrel was rated at 695hp. It was installed in the next prototype.

[This message has been edited by Jimdandy (edited 02-01-2001).]

ra · « **Reply #1 on:** February 01, 2001, 03:34:00 PM »

Junkers Jumo 210.

RAM · « **Reply #2 on:** February 01, 2001, 03:56:00 PM »

Junkers Ju210A

LJK Raubvogel · « **Reply #3 on:** February 01, 2001, 04:23:00 PM »

Geo Metro 1.8L inline 4 rated at 45hp.

StSanta · « **Reply #4 on:** February 01, 2001, 08:29:00 PM »

LOL vogel!

Like yer handle, too. Bird of prey

------------------
Baron Claus "StSanta" Von Ribbentroppen
9./JG 54 "Grünherz"

"I don't necessarily agree with everything I think." - A. Eldritch

Suave1 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 01, 2001, 09:38:00 PM »

Geo metro had an inline 3 cylinder

. I had a Geo pet once .

chunder' · « **Reply #6 on:** February 01, 2001, 11:58:00 PM »

The Metro engine was also only 1.3L

J_A_B · « **Reply #7 on:** February 02, 2001, 12:10:00 AM »

My aunt's Geo has a 1.0 liter 3-cyl in it.

Complete POS, that "car" is.

J_A_B

Jimdandy · « **Reply #8 on:** February 02, 2001, 06:19:00 AM »

Yep it was the Ju210. The Metro engine didn't appear until later in the war in the long range models.

Author Topic: 109 trivia II (Read 361 times)

LJK Raubvogel