Author Topic: Guess that ship!  (Read 4232 times)

Offline trotter

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 817
Re: Guess that ship!
« Reply #105 on: November 13, 2009, 05:03:53 AM »
Yep the Yamato.  Pic I found said it was a picture from it's sea trials.

Nice looking ship. Never realized the bridge was so high proportionally to the rest of the design. Also seems like a lot of spare bow space, but I guess it wouldn't be stable for any gun platforms.

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: Guess that ship!
« Reply #106 on: November 13, 2009, 11:38:44 AM »
"only ship I have ever been on.

then a few years later I did a pen and ink drawing of it that they(gift shop) sold prints of when I was 15."

U.S.S. Constitution?
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline ink

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11274
Re: Guess that ship!
« Reply #107 on: November 13, 2009, 03:09:55 PM »
"only ship I have ever been on.

then a few years later I did a pen and ink drawing of it that they(gift shop) sold prints of when I was 15."

U.S.S. Constitution?


I know too easy :aok

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Guess that ship!
« Reply #108 on: November 13, 2009, 04:23:41 PM »
A very good book



# Hardcover: 192 pages
# Publisher: Conway Maritime Press Ltd; 2nd edition (June 24, 2004)
# ISBN-10: 0851779409
# ISBN-13: 978-0851779409
# Product Dimensions: 10.3 x 9.7 x 0.9 inches

Only 32 pages of text and photos. The rest is scale line drawings.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Re: Guess that ship!
« Reply #109 on: November 14, 2009, 09:19:56 AM »
mind boggling ship the yamato,the armour speed and guns, simply amazing.

Then the ijn just let it die, travesty.

Indeed, the Yamatos were remarkable in many ways. Post war analysis does indicate that they were inferior in some critical areas to the Iowa class. They were slower, not as well designed for survivability and lacked the U.S. BBs supremely accurate fire control radars. The penetration of the 18.1" shells was barely equal to the American 16" shells at long range. The faster ship certainly determines engagement range. Halsey was chafing at the bit to turn his Iowas loose against the Yamatos. It wasn't meant to be.

Yamato fought but one surface engagement, which was at Samar in October of 1944. There, she spent much of her time dodging torpedoes from American destroyers, collected a bevy of 5" rounds from same (superficial damage), and then was strafed and bombed by American Naval aircraft. In general, she contributed little. At Samar, she was Kurita's flagship, and when the Japanese finally had a chance to do some serious damage to American jeep carriers, Kurita lost his nerve and retired from the fight.

Both Yamatos represented the pinnacle of pre-war battleship design. Their deck armor was and would remain the best ever built onto a ship. Their main belt armor was very heavy, but was constructed of softer steel than that of the Iowas. Both the Iowas and the South Dakota's had superior STS armor plate, which more than offset the Yamato's greater thickness. When the Iowas entered service in 1944, the Yamatos no longer lived alone at the top of the food chain.


My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline vatiAH

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 331
Re: Guess that ship!
« Reply #110 on: November 14, 2009, 04:08:28 PM »
Here is some interesting reading about the armor plate used on the Yamato class turrets.    
http://www.navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-040.htm


Vati
« Last Edit: November 14, 2009, 06:03:11 PM by vatiAH »
Ductus Exemplo:  Lead by Example