Messed up by N1H1 vaccine?

[CAP1]

I was referring to the tetanus shot they give you if your last one wasn't within the last 5 years of the injury.  As far as the Pox vaccine is concerned, I wonder if you can pay a doctor to get it for you?

i don't recall them giving me any shots, except to numb my forearm for the stitches.

it was pretty disgusting/amazing to watch the doc. sew my arm closed, and not feel a dam thing. 

[allaire]

Course can't be any worse than basic in 2000.  All we were told was roll up you sleeves and wipe your arms with these alcohol soaked cotton balls.  I still don't have a clue to what the vaccines were.  Knew what the skin pop was for and what the arse shot was.

[CAP1]

Course can't be any worse than basic in 2000.  All we were told was roll up you sleeves and wipe your arms with these alcohol soaked cotton balls.  I still don't have a clue to what the vaccines were.  Knew what the skin pop was for and what the arse shot was.

i should clarify.....i'm not against people going for these vaccinations....nor am i against them being offered, or recommended.

 i just don't feel the need or desire for me personally to do it.,


 that said........what you typed above.......that's a little scary. if for no other reason, than my stupid bellybutton being afraid of needles. 

  would be me. 

[allaire]

They only one you would have tried to pull a for would have been the bicillin in the cheek.  Friggin hurt like hell getting the injection and for 3 days after it.  Damn guys that were allergic to pennicillin thought it was funny to see people rubbing their buttcheek and limping.

[Meatwad]

I havent had it and will never take one no matter what

[Stalwart]

Course can't be any worse than basic in 2000.  All we were told was roll up you sleeves and wipe your arms with these alcohol soaked cotton balls.  I still don't have a clue to what the vaccines were.  Knew what the skin pop was for and what the arse shot was.

Ditto  1990  What the heck did they just shoot in me?   

[CAP1]

Ditto  1990  What the heck did they just shoot in me?   

little rfd chips. they know what you're thinking right now. 

[Stalwart]

oh s!@#$  I'm f!@#$....   

[CavPuke]

Course can't be any worse than basic in 2000.  All we were told was roll up you sleeves and wipe your arms with these alcohol soaked cotton balls.  I still don't have a clue to what the vaccines were.  Knew what the skin pop was for and what the arse shot was.

You throw away the little yellow book (the U.S. Department of Public Health International Certificate of Vaccinations) you were issued ?

[Fishu]

http://www.rokotusinfo.fi/

more populistic and hysterical BS. Statistics are populistic and hysterical too considering that many vaccinations expose you to a higher risk than what they're supposed to cure.

lol, you really do believe that site, don't you? The site was founded on an agenda for christ sake! You should make a background check on the people behind the organization and where from they amend their so called truth - mostly from other sources with a similar agenda. That's really reliable information you got there. All in the name of self-determination.

Not much of a self-determination there when you're being lead to a certain conclusion by having fuel provided for your fears.

While you've acted critically towards the information provided by the officials you haven't acted critically towards this organization.

[OOZ662]

On the other hand, it's psychologically obvious that when you stubbornly decide that the top of the problem is a myth or overblown (the flu), you then bias everything that's trying to prove you wrong. Just sayin'.

[MrRiplEy[H]]

lol, you really do believe that site, don't you? The site was founded on an agenda for christ sake! You should make a background check on the people behind the organization and where from they amend their so called truth - mostly from other sources with a similar agenda. That's really reliable information you got there. All in the name of self-determination.

Not much of a self-determination there when you're being lead to a certain conclusion by having fuel provided for your fears.

While you've acted critically towards the information provided by the officials you haven't acted critically towards this organization.

Can you prove any of that information to be false? I didn't think so.

[batch]

On the other hand, it's psychologically obvious that when you stubbornly decide that the top of the problem is a myth or overblown (the flu), you then bias everything that's trying to prove you wrong. Just sayin'.

or vise-versa

[Fishu]

Can you prove any of that information to be false? I didn't think so.

Let's not forget that you're the one trying to spread information from the site as a truth, I'm not. How about you do that, prove that all the information indeed is genuine and not affected by bias to any degree.

Regardless, I already told you to do a background check. But since you haven't, let me assist you a bit:

"1. Keitä Rokotusinfo ry:ssä toimii, miksi ja millä asiantuntemuksella?"
"-- Lääkärin koulutusta tai muuten lääketieteellistä tutkintoa ei ole kenelläkään hallituksessa --"

In english:

"1. Who work at Rokotusinfo organization, why and with what expertise?"
" -- Nobody in the board has a doctor's education or other kind of medical degree --"


Originally I intented to say that they're no different from people in the forums, which is nearly the truth. People in their discussion forum are told to contribute to alot of the organization's information.

"9. Oletteko tarkistaneet, että kaikki sivuillanne esittämänne lainaukset ja linkit perustuvat tieteellisiin tosiasioihin?"
"Meillä ei ole mahdollisuuksia arvioida kaikkea mihin viittaamme ja mitä lainaamme, emmekä myöskään pyri esittämään kantaa, onko joku väite totta vai ei, vaan kirjaston tavoin pyrimme tarjoamaan työkaluja ja viitteitä joilla ihmiset voivat itse kriittisesti arvioida lukemaansa"

"9. Have you verified that all the quotes and links on your website are based on scientific facts?"
"We have no capability to evaluate everything we refer to and quote, neither are we trying to present an opinion whether an argument is true or not, but to offer tools and references like a library so people can self critically evaluate what they have read".


Have you practiced criticism with the information of the library, like they've told you to do?

[OOZ662]

or vise-versa

Also true.