Author Topic: Development screenshots of new city.  (Read 13331 times)

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #90 on: October 30, 2009, 07:55:19 AM »
Enker,

All polygons are triangles.  So every square or rectangle takes 2 polygons to make, thus the minimum for those buildings is 10.  Putting peaked roofs on them would raise that to 14.  Remember, the ends of the building need to be flush with the roof, so those walls need 3 polygons now.

Also, why would you put floors on the buildings? Not like you see inside them.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #91 on: October 30, 2009, 08:28:25 AM »
Very nice work.  It's nice to see buildings looking less cartoonish.
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline captain1ma

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14353
      • JG54 website
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #92 on: October 30, 2009, 08:33:39 AM »
It looks frigging awesome, however due to the size, I think we'll need to activate a large group of B29's to level it. Of course theres always the nuclear solution too  :D

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #93 on: October 30, 2009, 08:52:12 AM »
Looks fantastic but.
And maybe Im being nit picky but flat roofs were not the dominant architecture design during the WWII time period

Dresden
(Image removed from quote.)

Dresden was hardly a typical city - seat of the kings of saxony for over 500 years it was regarded by many as the most beautiful city in the world. until Feb 1945 that is ...
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Westy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #94 on: October 30, 2009, 08:58:55 AM »
Any chance you could make the churches, orphanages and hospitals stick out
from the other buildings a bit better?

Oh? And is napalm in the works??

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #95 on: October 30, 2009, 09:00:46 AM »
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline captain1ma

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14353
      • JG54 website
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #96 on: October 30, 2009, 09:00:52 AM »
Oh? And is napalm in the works??

yeah we could just firebomb it for 24 hours!  :airplane:


Offline Waffle

  • HTC Staff Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
      • HiTech Creations Inc. Aces High
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #97 on: October 30, 2009, 09:08:55 AM »
Rough estimate of the number of buildings is around 25,000 - 30,000.

Offline Wreked

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 329
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #98 on: October 30, 2009, 09:39:42 AM »
yeah we could just firebomb it for 24 hours!  :airplane:

Incendiary bomb loads for buffs would be great - then we could let the GV guys have a bright RED FIRETRUCK to play with too!

...cheers eh!
HO is a HO is a HO!!
You can lead a donkey to a FACT - you just can't make them think!

cheers eh!!

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #99 on: October 30, 2009, 09:41:03 AM »
Rough estimate of the number of buildings is around 25,000 - 30,000.

 :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O

And how many are destroyable?
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #100 on: October 30, 2009, 09:41:40 AM »
How much do you have to pay google earth for these images?

I agree with the "To many flat roofs" btw.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2009, 09:45:47 AM by Kazaa »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #101 on: October 30, 2009, 09:52:24 AM »
Rough estimate of the number of buildings is around 25,000 - 30,000.
Gimme the Lancaster with a 22,000lb Grand Slam! :x

Offline Kuhn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 925
      • Canvasman
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #102 on: October 30, 2009, 10:44:40 AM »
There goes the neighborhood.   :D
325th Checkertails

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12384
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #103 on: October 30, 2009, 11:14:01 AM »
Enker,

All polygons are triangles.  So every square or rectangle takes 2 polygons to make, thus the minimum for those buildings is 10.  Putting peaked roofs on them would raise that to 14.  Remember, the ends of the building need to be flush with the roof, so those walls need 3 polygons now.

Close Karnak, you forgot the 2 extra on the ends of the building that go from 4 verts to 5, so the increase would be 10 Triangles to 16 Triangles.

Offline JimmyC

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5196
Re: Development screenshots of new city.
« Reply #104 on: October 30, 2009, 11:56:41 AM »
I do think it looks great....
But ...........the flat roof issue and the grid (blocks) just seem so new and american.....sorry :uhoh
Old european citys developed over hundreds of years and so are very higgldypiggldy (sp)
2pence worth....just an observation
<S> Jimmy
CO 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy."