That line doesn't make grammatical sense to me... 
The WW1 part of this game may bring in some new players, but that's doubtful. Most WW1 games have small followings. More than likely already existing customers will fly it (little "new" revenue). May be fun, sure, but it's no reason for his original post.
I think folks may be over-reacting to the WW1 arena, but the entire way SB made his original post is just wrong in my opinion.
Heres my opinion on SB's post and why I think he's got a great point you would have to read other posts to know what I was talking about on the other.
It's amazing how many whines are from players about changes. So many whines about filling out the WWII plane set.
People are genetic whinners most of the time because they've always got everything in life they've wanted and just like to complain reguardless of the topic. Most of the whinners are divorced and are un social people who need Church and Jesus in there LifeIf you compare the number of kills in the LW arena for September the most successful aircraft was the P-51D, the least the P-40B. The P-40B had less that 1/2 of 1% the success of the P-51D. Yes I know the reason that it is not as successful so that dog won't hunt. I question the reasoning of the people that demand (and they do demand) filling out the plane set of every plane that flew in WWII before HTC moves on to anything else. Did these guys whine about adding vehicles too?
Not only do they demand they think people actually care you they delete their account. The percentage between the top plane and the least plane is .005 percent success from SB's post and people still complain about this is not right that's not right. Everyone has to fly in the same conditions so if they're complaining maybe they need to be in the training arena more. We've had an real WWII Ace slandered in these forums without any documented proof during the arguements about adding WWI aircraft, folks crying about having vox in WWI planes and various and sundry things.
This is so pitiful that you have to slander a hero of our nation over a game. Childish get a life and to be frank go to hell! How many of these people really took the time to think about what is good for the continued growth of this game and how many are just saying I want what I want and I want it now? It doesn't add to gameplay, it doesn't bring in customers, but it makes me happy and pffffffft to the rest of you. Same ones that say I don't care that it costs the same to add an aircraft that won't get flown outside of scenarios as it does to do one that may bring in more people and keep this game growing?
It's called business sense. Can we bring in 50 new customers through this marketing compain or doing this or that. How much money is that going to cost us. Is it worth it to us as a Company? Should we create this new plane or that new plane. Your always looking for continued growth and modeling a plane for a scenario only doesn't make sense if you can spend that valued time modeling a plane that pushes the game forward, makes the game more fun for the customers you already have and at the same time have incentives or something no other WWII simulation company has to promote AHII to your new customer base.
It's hard for this post not to make sense, it does to me.
