Author Topic: More water troop carriers???  (Read 977 times)

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: More water troop carriers???
« Reply #16 on: October 21, 2009, 10:25:10 AM »
Thanks stoney :aok.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline SDGhalo

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 109
Re: More water troop carriers???
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2009, 10:53:56 AM »
instead of water troop carriers they should add the sherman DD tank

Modifications to the Sherman included sealing of the lower hull, the addition of the propeller drive and the addition of Straussler's flotation screen around the hull, together with its inflation system. The base of the canvas floatation screen was attached to a horizontal metal frame welded to the tank's hull. The screen was supported by horizontal metal hoops and by 36 vertical rubber tubes. A system of compressed air bottles and pipes inflated the rubber tubes to give the curtain rigidity. The screen could be erected in 15 minutes and quickly collapsed once the tank reached the shore. In combat, the flotation system was considered expendable and it was assumed the tank crew would remove and discard it as soon as conditions allowed [2] although, in practice, some units kept the floatation equipment and their tanks were used in several amphibious operations.

A pair of propellers at the rear provided propulsion. One problem presented by the Sherman was that the configuration of the transmission made it impossible to take a drive-shaft directly from the gearbox to the propellers. The solution to this was to have sprocket wheels at the rear of the tank so power was delivered to the propellers by the tank's tracks. DD Tanks could swim at up to 4 knots (4.6 mph; 7.4 km/h)[2]. Both the commander and the driver could steer in the water, although with different methods. A hydraulic system under the control of the driver could swivel the propellers; the commander stood on a platform on the turret, where he could see over the skirt, and steered the tank with a large tiller.

Experience from D-Day lead to an improved, Mark II version of the DD Sherman. The screen was extended and strengthened, a new type of bilge pump fitted and a second set of hydraulic steering controls was fitted at the commander's station, although his tiller was retained. An air compressor replaced the air cylinders that provided the pressurized air to erect the screen.



Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: More water troop carriers???
« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2009, 10:57:50 AM »
How many of those improved Sherman DD tanks were used after D-Day?
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline SDGhalo

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 109
Re: More water troop carriers???
« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2009, 11:19:41 AM »
How many of those improved Sherman DD tanks were used after D-Day?

After D day the tanks were used in other operations but i dont know how many maybe this would hep

Operation Dragoon
The Operation Dragoon landings took place on 15 August 1944. The invasion took place between Toulon and Cannes.

A total of 36 DD-tanks were used by three American tank battalions - the 191st, the 753rd and the 756th.[2] The 756th battalion had eight tanks that were launched 2,500 yards (2,286 m) from the beaches; one was swamped by the bow-wave of a landing craft and one sank after striking an underwater obstacle. The twelve tanks of the 191st battalion were all landed on or close to the beach. The 753rd battalion had 16 tanks, of which eight were launched at sea and successfully reached the shore and eight were landed directly on the beach later in the day.

[edit] North West Europe
 
Sherman DD tanks crossing the Rhine, 24 March 1945The Staffordshire Yeomanry were converted to DD tanks after D-Day and trained with them in Belgium. On the 26th of October 1944, they undertook a 7-mile (11 km) swim across the Western Scheldt to attack South Beveland, during the Battle of the Scheldt. The DD Tanks' longest operational water crossing took place without casualties, but the tanks had great difficulty in landing - 14 became bogged down in mud and only four were available for action.[13]

Operation Plunder, the crossed the Rhine, began on the night of the 23rd of March, 1945. As well as the Staffordshire Yeomanry, DD tanks equipped the American 736th and 738th Tank Battalions and the British 44th Royal Tank Regiment. Some tanks were lost in the river, but the crossings were considered a success. The tanks were launched from points upstream from their objectives, to take account of the Rhine's strong current, and mats at the objective points (carried across beforehand by LVTs) allowed the DDs to climb the steep, muddy banks of the river[13].

The DD's last combat, swimming operation was the Staffordshire Yeomanry's crossing of the River Elbe at Artlenburg on the 29th of April 1945[13].

[edit] Italian Campaign
By February 1945, the 7th Queen's Own Hussars in Italy had been trained an equipped with DD tanks, both DD Shermans and DD Valentines. DD Shermans were successfully used in the crossing of the Po River on the 24th of April. On the 28th of April, those tanks still able to swim were used in an assault across the River Adige. During this operation, Valentine DDs were used to transport fuel (their only know use on active service). The tanks continued to be used in combat in the advance towards Venice. There were no further swimming operations, but it was found that the folded flotation screen offered a large seating area, that made the tanks useful troop transports

Offline GreenEagle43

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 310
      • http://www.dickweedhbg.com
Re: More water troop carriers???
« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2009, 07:24:03 PM »
i don't think the duck was armored ether.so a few canon rounds would put you out of business.and as far as armaments i think they relied on the troops in the duck,witch would mean your all a bunch of sitting ducks.lol  :eek:
Recruiting Officer GrnEagle  DHBG
Dedicated to Bish Country. 16 YEARS of BOMBER SERVICE

AN Aces High BOMBER SQUADRON. www.dickweedhbg.com

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: More water troop carriers???
« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2009, 07:48:39 PM »
Can someone get me a pic of the Hadahtsu landing craft??? I'm not very familiar with Japanese vehicles.

I think he might have been referring to the Daihatsu Class IJN landing craft used in WW2.  The Japanese didn't use a landing craft called Hadahtsu.




ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: More water troop carriers???
« Reply #22 on: November 02, 2009, 08:33:30 PM »
I think he might have been referring to the Daihatsu Class IJN landing craft used in WW2.  The Japanese didn't use a landing craft called Hadahtsu.

(Image removed from quote.)


ack-ack


Lol can't beleive I didn't notice that GIANT typo till now. Sorry bout any confusion people.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th