Originally posted by pdog_109:
Not saying bout il-2, you say il2 is gay, il2 is a flightsim.
I didn't say anything, in fact it's actually a game.
Originally posted by pdog_109:
IL-2 V AH - FACTS
This should be interesting...
Originally posted by pdog_109:
IL-2 gunnery - realistic, difficult
AH gunnery - easy - 12 year old
Ah, common misconception. Difficult does not translate to more realistic. BTW, the calculations have been done time and time again and the trajectory, flight path and duration of rounds plus hitting power at ranges have all been tested and verified to be accurate.... in Aces High. Seen no data what-so-ever for Il-2.
Originally posted by pdog_109:
IL-2 FM - based on physics engine, demo fm is incorrct
AH - table based old
Do you even know what you are talking about? Just because it's 'physics' (they are both physics models, maybe you didn't take physics in high school) does not mean it's better. Pyro and HT can, and have proven, that table based flight performance can simulate real world aircraft very well. I've tested it before with someone in the TA. He took a P47D-30 and I took a 190A5. 190A5 outclimbed P47D-30 initially, at 20K the P47D-30 climbed faster. The rate of climb matched real world tests. Eerie how you can achieve damn near accurate performance with "old" things.
Originally posted by pdog_109:
IL2 graphis - realistic, good looking
AH - bmp painted by 12 year olds.
Those are some pretty damn talented 12 year olds. You'll find out just how bad Il-2 will perform in a 200 person multiplayer environment... no wait, *IF* it ever can host 200 people.
Originally posted by pdog_109:
Still i fly AH a bit because the demo mp sucks in il2.
And I'm sure it's going to be a whole lot better in the full release. Tell ya what, when you get the full version, tell me how good it is then. Right now it's half-baked, and I wouldn't be surprised if both the FM and MP code are only baked just a teeny weeny bit more before release. Meaning, I bet it won't be a whole lot better.
-SW