Author Topic: Very Tight  (Read 688 times)

Offline bcadoo

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 685
Very Tight
« on: November 07, 2009, 05:56:53 PM »
From the Wings Over Houston Airshow last weekend.

Blue Angels are always excellent, but they were exceptional this day.


Take note of the wingtips of #2 and #3.....




The fight is the fun........Don't run from the fun!
"Nothin' cuts the taste of clam juice like a big hunk o' chocolate" - Rosie O'Donnell

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2009, 06:20:58 PM »
 :O

where you there?
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline ebfd11

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4151
      • [b]POTW[/b]
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2009, 06:43:36 PM »
Take note when the Blue Angels start training the standard distancr from wing tip to wing tip is aprox 48 inches. As they progress and trust each other they get closer. I have personally seen them on a later show where the were aprox 18" from wingtip to wingtip. Now that's what you call trust in your fellow flier.   
PIGS ON THE WING 3RD WING

InGame id: LawnDart
RIP Skullman Potzie and BentNail

Offline skidoo33

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2009, 06:52:12 PM »
That's just amazing. :aok

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2009, 08:43:14 PM »
There not close enough!  :mad:
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline batch

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 640
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2009, 08:59:34 PM »
what if they lose calibration midflight like in AH?
"theres nothin like wakin up with a Dickens Cider" - Dickens Fruit Stand

Offline boomerlu

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2009, 09:10:19 PM »
what if they lose calibration midflight like in AH?
Better hope the USN doesn't purchase their joysticks from Saitek or Logitech.
boomerlu
JG11

Air Power rests at the apex of the first triad of victory, for it combines mobility, flexibility, and initiative.

Offline Kermit de frog

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3695
      • LGM Films
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2009, 09:11:18 PM »
what if they lose calibration midflight like in AH?

I hear their sticks have extra springs for added tension with less abrupt movements.  Also they do their performance without anti-G suits to avoid being distrubed by it causing them to have involuntary movements in their controls, which would be bad.   :O
Time's fun when you're having flies.

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2009, 10:01:12 PM »
When I read the thread title, I thought this was going to be another babe of the week sort of thread :(

As for the blue angels looking that close in the photo, they cheated of course.  The guy on the high wing has actually dropped down a couple of ft to make it look like the wingtips are almost touching.  The guy in the slot also isn't directly behind lead either, because if he was then the formation would look assymetrical.  They do that on a bunch of their photo passes, altering their positions just a tiny bit to make the formation look closer or more symmetrical.  It's pretty cool how they do that IMHO, but they still have "reasonable" wingtip clearance.

Reasonable for them is of course not terribly reasonable for most other pilots :)
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline bcadoo

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 685
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2009, 11:25:23 PM »
When I read the thread title, I thought this was going to be another babe of the week sort of thread :(

As for the blue angels looking that close in the photo, they cheated of course.  The guy on the high wing has actually dropped down a couple of ft to make it look like the wingtips are almost touching.  The guy in the slot also isn't directly behind lead either, because if he was then the formation would look assymetrical.  They do that on a bunch of their photo passes, altering their positions just a tiny bit to make the formation look closer or more symmetrical.  It's pretty cool how they do that IMHO, but they still have "reasonable" wingtip clearance.

Reasonable for them is of course not terribly reasonable for most other pilots :)


Possibly....here is a closer view


I did not attend this year, but got the photo from a buddy who did.

The fight is the fun........Don't run from the fun!
"Nothin' cuts the taste of clam juice like a big hunk o' chocolate" - Rosie O'Donnell

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2009, 11:32:04 PM »
From the audience perspective, it's almost impossible to tell that the high wing guy has dropped down.  I've seen the same formation photo pass, but from a completely different location, and from head-on you can tell very clearly that the high wing guy isn't symmetrical.  It makes it look a lot better for the airshow audience and if they were in the usual perfectly symmetrical positions, it would really look like someone was out of position.

Take a micrometer and measure the lengths of the wingtip rails...  In the photo it looks like they're almost touching so they should be pretty much the exact same length.  If you measure them however and the high wing guy's rail is shorter than the low wing one, then that means the high wing guy is actually farther away.  The only way to get the rails lined up but still be farther away, is to have the high wing guy drop "down" and "out" from his normal position.

I've seen this effect from inside the cockpit flying in all 4 of those positions, as flight lead and wingman in 4-ship formations.  It's all a matter of perspective, and some of the airshow formations rely on simple visual illusions to change the appearance of the formation.
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2009, 11:45:24 PM »
Saw them at Thunder Over Michigan this July.   They did the same.   Bottom line, you know if they're involved, you're getting a Top Notch Demonstration.   
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2009, 11:56:03 PM »
You ever listen to the flight lead talk....talk about verbal communication skill.

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2009, 01:01:48 AM »
but they still have "reasonable" wingtip clearance.

Reasonable clearance for the blue angels is still too close for me standing in line at the bank.
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline Buzzard7

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 601
Re: Very Tight
« Reply #14 on: November 08, 2009, 01:24:32 AM »
I have heard from a good source that 18 inches is good unless the day has some stiff wind. Eagl is also correct about adjusting for pretty pictures. The stick is heavy and so is the throttle.  Thunderbirds don't have the g-suit bumping the stick problem. They also use throttle friction to make it easier. I am not sure you can limit the side-stick in the Falcon seeing as it doesn't move much anyway.