Author Topic: A-26  (Read 5786 times)

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
A-26
« on: November 07, 2009, 07:31:04 PM »
Is there any real reason we can't get the A-26? Its not like it hasn't been asked for. I'm just wondering if hitech decreed that we won't get it or if there is a reason past that.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: A-26
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2009, 07:37:09 PM »
No reason not to get it at all.  Quite frankly, it rocks.

YES TO THE A-26!!!!
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A-26
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2009, 07:42:49 PM »
WOOOT!!!!  :banana:

And the A-26 please.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline K-KEN

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 874
      • http://www.cutthroats.com
Re: A-26
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2009, 08:11:21 PM »
About a year or so ago, it came in 2nd place to the B25, as I recall. HTC actually surveyed all the pie-lets with a pop-up radio button to vote. I was for it then and would be now. It was one of my favorite rides in Air Warrior.

 :aok

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A-26
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2009, 09:24:24 PM »
Oh yeah, I remember that. I voted for it. Damnit, I voted for it so it should have won  :cry.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6635
Re: A-26
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2009, 09:26:49 PM »
About a year or so ago, it came in 2nd place to the B25, as I recall. HTC actually surveyed all the pie-lets with a pop-up radio button to vote. I was for it then and would be now. It was one of my favorite rides in Air Warrior.

 :aok

I thought the 39 came in second to the 25, and the 26 was third?  Hell, I can't remember that long ago anyway.
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A-26
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2009, 09:32:32 PM »
Hey,  just a quick question, why did they ordering go out of order? P-40 is EW right? Then how come the P-38 is MW?
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: A-26
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2009, 10:16:14 PM »
Hey,  just a quick question, why did they ordering go out of order? P-40 is EW right? Then how come the P-38 is MW?

Because the number designation has nothing to do with the year the plane was produced and operational.  The number designation was based on chronological order.  For example, the P-40 was the 40th basic pursuit aircraft to be ordered by the USAAF, the P-38 was the 38th basic pursuit aircraft ordered.

(prefix)(type)-(chron. num.)(variant)-(production block)-(factory)


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: A-26
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2009, 10:17:17 PM »
deleted due to triple post mess up


ack-ack
« Last Edit: November 07, 2009, 10:43:26 PM by Ack-Ack »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: A-26
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2009, 10:18:09 PM »
deleted due to triple post mess up


ack-ack
« Last Edit: November 07, 2009, 10:43:16 PM by Ack-Ack »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline B4Buster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4816
Re: A-26
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2009, 10:37:28 PM »
wtg akak, triple post.

 :banana:
"I was a door gunner on the space shuttle Columbia" - Scott12B

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: A-26
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2009, 10:42:24 PM »
wtg akak, triple post.

 :banana:

Stupid browser, got an error each time I clicked on Post so I figured it didn't go through.  LOL!


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: A-26
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2009, 10:58:35 PM »
Also keep in mind that the time a plane BEGINS development, is not the time a plane enters service. Many planes had long and complicated development cycles... So while the P-47 saw service before the P-51, the P-38 saw service after the P-40.

Consider the P-39 earned an order for a prototype in October of 1937, and had the prototype flying by April 1938.

The XP-39E was an up-engined version designed to get more out of the plane. They were tested in Feb 1942, and re-designated P-76. 4,000 were to be built, but production was cancelled 3 months later in favor of a redesigned air frame to go WITH the more powerful engine.

So the P-63 was born. First flights Dec 1942 and Feb 1943.

Goes from P-39 to P-73 to P-63, chronologically speaking.

I just liked that example because it's a good illustration that the number didn't really imply order of inclusion.

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: A-26
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2009, 01:12:43 AM »
Shades of 'Always', I reckon an A-26 fire-bomber would be handy for extinguishing flaming hangars. Put the guns back in for 'Bay of Pigs' Special Events, of course . . .

 ;)
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17417
Re: A-26
« Reply #14 on: November 08, 2009, 04:58:37 AM »
we need the a26 it had the biggest guns of any ww2 airplane  :x.  110's will be obsolete (j/k)

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.