Author Topic: A-26  (Read 5787 times)

Offline usvi

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 994
Re: A-26
« Reply #60 on: November 09, 2009, 01:24:24 PM »
100 perks would definitely be worth it.


FINALLY we would have something worthwhile and effective to spend our bomber perks on!!!
"Come with me and I will show you where the Iron Crosses grow." -Unteroffizer/Feldwebel Rolf Steiner

~POTW-Second Wing~
http://www.pigsonthewing.org/index.php

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10465
Re: A-26
« Reply #61 on: November 09, 2009, 03:10:14 PM »
So hitech, is there any real reason we can't get the A-26?


 Actually there "was" a reason but it has been corrected now!

 I believe the A26 should be included ingame but I'd like to see the planeset filled out first.

 Oh and I'd say 100 perks would be fair and worth the cost to fly this bird.

 If and when we get it I hope I dont run into Cobie flying it,unless he's in green..... :devil

   :salute

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: A-26
« Reply #62 on: November 09, 2009, 03:25:24 PM »
Reasons it will need to be perked fairly high?

Its capability. OK so thats number 1. It was a late war attack plane so good at what it did that it hung around for 30 years. For all I know its still being used. Imagine the A-20 with more guns, much faster, and far more maneuverable.

2, Gamewise it would be almost impossible to defend against once it was located. That is unless you have a very fast fighter already up with Altitude. And even then it will be difficult to catch before it drops ords.

3, It will be pure murder on CVs. As a level bomber or, especially, dive bombing and chucking out 36 500lb bombs from a formation. And its so fast it will be very hard to stop.

4, Just as effective for porking fields, VHs, other hangars...ect

5, Most players have so many zillions of bomber perks if the thing aint perked halfway high the A-26 bomb and bailers will screw up the game even more then they do in Lancs. The Invaders get to their target so fast, with so much ord, and if they were perked at 10 points these same clowns will chuck them away as fast as they do their Lancs.

6, Lastly they will have a huge impact on GV'ing. Most of all tanks. I might kill a lot of tanks but I do it with gunnery, from a very slow airplane. A good dive bomber, in such a fast maneuverable plane, with so many 500lb bombs, will impact the GV game a great deal. You can just plain upp them and get them to targets so quickly, with so much TnT..... The Invader really would have to be controlled with perk price or it would just ruin GV'ing. Even a single will hold 12 500lb bombs.

So a light perk price would be out of the question I would think. I believe the A-26 would impact the game even more then the B-29 would. It would be a pure killer no doubt.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: A-26
« Reply #63 on: November 09, 2009, 03:33:52 PM »
Reasons it will need to be perked fairly high?

Its capability. OK so thats number 1. It was a late war attack plane so good at what it did that it hung around for 30 years. For all I know its still being used. Imagine the A-20 with more guns, much faster, and far more maneuverable.

2, Gamewise it would be almost impossible to defend against once it was located. That is unless you have a very fast fighter already up with Altitude. And even then it will be difficult to catch before it drops ords.

3, It will be pure murder on CVs. As a level bomber or, especially, dive bombing and chucking out 36 500lb bombs from a formation. And its so fast it will be very hard to stop.

4, Just as effective for porking fields, VHs, other hangars...ect

5, Most players have so many zillions of bomber perks if the thing aint perked halfway high the A-26 bomb and bailers will screw up the game even more then they do in Lancs. The Invaders get to their target so fast, with so much ord, and if they were perked at 10 points these same clowns will chuck them away as fast as they do their Lancs.

6, Lastly they will have a huge impact on GV'ing. Most of all tanks. I might kill a lot of tanks but I do it with gunnery, from a very slow airplane. A good dive bomber, in such a fast maneuverable plane, with so many 500lb bombs, will impact the GV game a great deal. You can just plain upp them and get them to targets so quickly, with so much TnT..... The Invader really would have to be controlled with perk price or it would just ruin GV'ing. Even a single will hold 12 500lb bombs.

So a light perk price would be out of the question I would think. I believe the A-26 would impact the game even more then the B-29 would. It would be a pure killer no doubt.

I agree with you except for saying that the A-26 would have formations. Bombsite or not if the A-26 gets formations then the A-20 should get fromations too. And didnt the A-20 have a bombsite nose too?

50 seems a little more reasonable. 75 at most.

Wish we could have the 37mm + 75mm nose. Then we could perk it like a 262.  :O

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: A-26
« Reply #64 on: November 09, 2009, 03:40:09 PM »
The A-20 does have formations. Called the Boston by the Brits.

My guess is it would work the same way in the game. Formations for the glass nose. Singles for the attacker.

Like the B-25 also.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: A-26
« Reply #65 on: November 09, 2009, 03:45:40 PM »
The A-20 does have formations. Called the Boston by the Brits.

My guess is it would work the same way in the game. Formations for the glass nose. Singles for the attacker.

Like the B-25 also.

Touche sir, Touche.

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A-26
« Reply #66 on: November 09, 2009, 06:03:07 PM »
Really? It will be 50 to 70 mph faster then the B-26 and carry an additional 2,000 lbs of ords. Here, take a look at its maneuverability and zoom http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iayVNS20rc

So Mossie speed, with near P-38 maneuverability, and a 6,000lb bombload, and B-26 level defensive gunnery?

Perk it at 10 and you might as we;; call the game A-26 High.

Past its fixed guns, it has 4 .50's, 2 dorsal, and 2 ventral. Where as the B-26 has 7, 2 tail, 2 top, 1 left ventral, 1 right ventral, and 1 nose.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: A-26
« Reply #67 on: November 09, 2009, 06:24:16 PM »
The A-20 does have formations. Called the Boston by the Brits.

My guess is it would work the same way in the game. Formations for the glass nose. Singles for the attacker.

Like the B-25 also.

  when bostons can carry 8 500 lbs bombs,grow some big boy guns and handle like a A-20 then you can call it an A-20
 


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A-26
« Reply #68 on: November 09, 2009, 07:16:10 PM »
OK, so it seems like this would be a really dangerous plane. How about free for the bomber version, but 20 perks for the 8 gun version, and 25 for the 8 gun version, along with the wing mounted .50's?
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: A-26
« Reply #69 on: November 09, 2009, 07:17:06 PM »
yes  :aok

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: A-26
« Reply #70 on: November 09, 2009, 08:25:26 PM »
Where was all the ammo for the extra nose guns carried? In the bomb-bay? If so, forget carrying many bombs (if any) if the gunship version's your choice.

<departs muttering 'usual over-gunned USAAF kites>

 ;)
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: A-26
« Reply #71 on: November 09, 2009, 09:10:18 PM »
Where was all the ammo for the extra nose guns carried? In the bomb-bay? If so, forget carrying many bombs (if any) if the gunship version's your choice.

<departs muttering 'usual over-gunned USAAF kites>

 ;)
Yea cuz quad hizzokas in the nose of a mossie is under gunned. :neener:
See Rule #4

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: A-26
« Reply #72 on: November 09, 2009, 09:48:08 PM »
Yes, compared to the A-26, the mossy looks like a pile of crap.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: A-26
« Reply #73 on: November 09, 2009, 09:48:46 PM »
I truly don't believe that the A-26 should be perked that high, if at all. I would rather have ord perked as I would want to fly the A-26 primarily as a fighter.

At the end of the day the A-26 is still liable of being chased down and raped by the much faster and more maneuverable fighters and I don't think it's gun domes would put up an effective enough defence, it would be solely on the bomber pilot to out fly the enemy in his fighter.

I would also love to see the A-26 have automated gun turrets just for the hell of it, can I get a +1?
« Last Edit: November 09, 2009, 10:14:26 PM by Kazaa »



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: A-26
« Reply #74 on: November 10, 2009, 04:21:55 AM »
Yes, compared to the A-26, the mossy looks like a pile of crap.

Well, you're young and sometimes make comments (like the above) that aren't so bright. 


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song