Author Topic: We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster  (Read 1356 times)

Aladar

  • Guest
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« on: September 13, 2000, 09:34:00 PM »
We need a Ju87G2, Tankbuster version. It's almost impossible to kill those tanks!!

------------------
KOMET, ADMIT IT, YOU WANT ONE!!!!!!!!

Offline Wingnut_0

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 183
      • http://www.Luftjagerkorps.com
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2000, 09:56:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Aladar:
We need a Ju87G2, Tankbuster version. It's almost impossible to kill those tanks!!


I'd love an 87G..but with only 12 rnds of 37mm I'd have to have someone distract them while I came in from behind.

They'd start picking me off way before I could get close enough to accurately hit them.  

Wingnut


Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2000, 10:23:00 PM »
You wanna bust tanks? You need the BEAST

Offline leonid

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 239
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2000, 10:23:00 PM »
ahem.

May I suggest a better designed assault aircraft?

Il-2m3.

Good Day.

 

------------------
leonid, Kompol
5 GIAP VVS-KA, Knights

"Our cause is just.  The enemy will be crushed.  Victory will be ours."
ingame: Raz

funked

  • Guest
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2000, 11:30:00 PM »
Yep Il-2 or Il-10, planes that killed a LOT of tanks.  

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2000, 03:49:00 AM »
What about this beautiful kite, never ever modeled in any sim (CK beta apart):

 

"We took off from Schweidnitz to attack a Russian tank column which was advancing between Streigau and Jauer. Flying with me in an Hs 129 B-3 as Number 2 in my Schwarm was a young pilot with fewer than ten operational missions to his credit. On our third approach against a T-34, his shot hit the side of the tank, just below its turret. The 75 mm round blew a hole about one metre (3 ft) in diameter in the left hand side of the hull and the tank immediately caught fire. During the following operation that day, while we were operating against tanks in the city of Streigau, a tank exploded after the first shot. The impact of the 75 mm cannon was extraordinary."
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Jerry B

  • Guest
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2000, 04:53:00 AM »
Lol gatt - it would be even better if it carried the downwards-firing array of 75mm recoiless guns. They were set off whenever the aircraft passed over a large metal object - which would make hitting those tanks a bit easier  

Jerry B

  • Guest
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #7 on: September 14, 2000, 05:21:00 AM »
Gatt -

Where is that quote from?

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2000, 05:30:00 AM »
Jerry,
check at:

 http://www.classic-books.co.uk/books/tophs129.html

one of the best books I have ever red.
Regards,
GATT
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #9 on: September 14, 2000, 08:11:00 AM »
You have 2 very excellent tank busters in the game, the Typhoon and F4U-1C.

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #10 on: September 14, 2000, 08:30:00 AM »
Rip, but for us historical German squads, we sorely miss something that can kill armour with cannons only.

We don't even have air to ground rockets.

Our birds can carry only one egg.

Our 30mm and 20mm are useless against anything with a little armour.

I'd be happy if the A8 had some of the bomb loadouts discussed in other threads, but a tank buster would make me jubilant  



------------------
StSanta
JG54 "Grünherz"
"If you died a stones throw from your wingie; you did no wrong". - Hangtime

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #11 on: September 14, 2000, 08:31:00 AM »

Did the Typhoons really knock out Panzer IV only with 20mm cannons? I mean from any angle.
I suspect that the high number of tank kills in AH by the Tiffies and the C-Hogs depend on uber-Hispanos. But I can be wrong.

Dedicated tank-busters can also be used in scenarios. We need also a self-propelled gun.

Fighters, medium bombers, tank busters, tanks, self-propelled guns ... voilà we can run the Kursk scenario.

Ok, ok, after the Dora, ok  
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

funked

  • Guest
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #12 on: September 14, 2000, 09:05:00 AM »
Knocking out panzers with 20 mm is baloney.  I'm sure it could happen theoretically, but in practice, both Axis and Allies were forced to put larger and larger cannons in planes or develop anti-tank rockets.

Planes like the Il-2, Il-10, Ju 87G, and Hs 129 were far more effective against panzers in RL than the stuff we use here.

[This message has been edited by funked (edited 09-14-2000).]

Offline flakbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
      • http://www.worldaccessnet.com/~delta6
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #13 on: September 14, 2000, 09:54:00 AM »
Hs-129 or Il-2 Type 3. Either would be fine for anti-tank/building/hangar work. The Hs-192 would just blast everything to rubble, while the Il-2 T3 could hit low-alt BUFFs in addition to nailing tanks.

VYa 23mm cannon on that Il-2 could punch through an inch of armor-plate steel at 400 meters. That's AP ammo of course. HE shells would just blow things to bits, kinda like a high-velocity 30mm Mk 103.

The Hs-129 I never heard of before a few people started mentioning it here. A single 75mm cannon from above would kill even a Tiger I E tank.

Either one I'm all for.


Flakbait
Delta 6's Flight School

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
We are in SERIOUS need of a tankbuster
« Reply #14 on: September 14, 2000, 10:14:00 AM »
Yes, Panzer IVHs were vulnerable to Hispano cannons.

Even Panther Vs were destroyed by Tiffie cannon, just VERY rarely.  Panzer IVs would be quite vulnerable.

Sisu
-Karnak
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-