Author Topic: Yet another WWI planeset question-  (Read 1027 times)

Offline HHBurn

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2009, 01:13:14 PM »
No idea why your wasting space on this subject.  Surely your not getting your hopes up..do none of you remember the CT or campaign thingy?
The only constant around here is smoke and mirrors and incomplete ideas.
We are seeing the very early stages of what might turn out to be the next great "two weeks" joke.
If you want to post on anything..post requests for realistic time frames and weekly/bi-monthly updates on progress.
That way we don't have to see 300 posts about where is the WWI arena?

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2009, 01:17:11 PM »
The only constant around here is smoke and mirrors and incomplete ideas.
We are seeing the very early stages of what might turn out to be the next great "two weeks" joke.
lol who pee'd in your wheaties this morning  :aok
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5707
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #17 on: November 17, 2009, 04:26:56 PM »
It would have to be a RPS for ww1.
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #18 on: November 17, 2009, 05:25:08 PM »
Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline Gabriel

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 207
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #19 on: November 17, 2009, 06:13:30 PM »
It's moot now I'm sure but I would have preferred a 1916 starter set  :uhoh

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #20 on: November 18, 2009, 10:16:05 AM »
I rather fancy a nice il'l Bristol Scout, like this'un, but with a forward-firing Vickers instead of Lanoe Hawker's early Lewis bolt-on.



Historically correct for No.6 Squadron RFC, y'see - the great Hawker was a Flight Commander and won his VC in 1611, 25th July 1915.

 :cool:

Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline HHBurn

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #21 on: November 18, 2009, 12:44:00 PM »
lol who pee'd in your wheaties this morning  :aok

Noone I've just competed in this rodeo before..anyone who was looking forward to CT or any of the other "great creations" has seen this dance before...the "new" cityscape has been released at least twice that i've seen and toted as evidence of progress...
Its all well and fine to become excited about a new shiny but, if we do not learn from the history of events we are doomed to see them repeated.
Ask for updates and timeframes, these are useful pieces of information..dont spam the forums full of pictures of balsa wood aircraft that you know you will never get.

Offline Boxboy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #22 on: November 18, 2009, 02:18:00 PM »
Noone I've just competed in this rodeo before..anyone who was looking forward to CT or any of the other "great creations" has seen this dance before...the "new" cityscape has been released at least twice that i've seen and toted as evidence of progress...
Its all well and fine to become excited about a new shiny but, if we do not learn from the history of events we are doomed to see them repeated.
Ask for updates and timeframes, these are useful pieces of information..dont spam the forums full of pictures of balsa wood aircraft that you know you will never get.

I thought they were quite specific "for a game producer", not this next patch but before the end of the year.  I just don't think your going to get any better than that.

Let me say that the team has done WWI "before" so this is not experimental like CT was, and futher more it is unlikely that HTC would follow a fail like CT with another one what would be the point??
Sub Lt BigJim
801 Sqn FAA
Pilot

Offline SPKmes

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3271
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #23 on: November 18, 2009, 02:39:03 PM »
There has been only 1 time ENY has interfered with my usual ride and I used the p40b    any at the time was 39 :O

Offline Boxboy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #24 on: November 18, 2009, 03:44:12 PM »
There has been only 1 time ENY has interfered with my usual ride and I used the p40b    any at the time was 39 :O

 :headscratch: :headscratch: :headscratch: :headscratch: :O
Sub Lt BigJim
801 Sqn FAA
Pilot

Offline Treize69

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5597
      • http://grupul7vanatoare.homestead.com/Startpage.html
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #25 on: November 18, 2009, 07:07:51 PM »
There has been only 1 time ENY has interfered with my usual ride and I used the p40b    any at the time was 39 :O

Treize (pronounced 'trays')- because 'Treisprezece' is too long and even harder to pronounce.

Moartea bolșevicilor.

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Yet another WWI planeset question-
« Reply #26 on: November 19, 2009, 08:54:32 PM »
can I have a toke tongs
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.