Furballers VS Base Takers

[bj229r]

Whorders on the Border? ....the possibilities are endless

[BiPoLaR]

Whorders on the Border? ....the possibilities are endless

im not gonna start. I dont feel like getting that PNG 

[cattb]

god why do i have to agree?

first time for everything

 

[Delirium]

Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.

[JunkyII]

Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.

He isnt in PoTW and he understands

[RedTop]

Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.

Great point Del!!!

As CO of a squad I can agree completely with your points.

[grizz441]

Squads are built around their members, not their leadership. A good cohesive squad will instantly rally when a CO becomes unavailable and rebuild. It happened to the 80th once already and our old CO took the chance of returning to a completely different squad. Unfortunately for him, we are still a bunch of augering losers that don't take bases.

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild. You obviously have the experience to recreate a large independently functional squadron, use the experience to improve on your previous design.

You can make an argument for both sides.  I think it's a given that the members make a squad.  It isn't the squad name that is important but that the members enjoy flying with each other.  Twitchy created "Pigs on the Wing" though, the name is his creation.  I don't really know what the solution is tbh, but I see both sides of it.

[DrDea]

 Name it  "Pork.The other wing.   PTOW

[Plazus]

Here's my take on it...

An Early Translation:
Pigs travel in a HERD, they eat until not is left but mud and their excrement, and then they move on to eat again, their oinks eching on the text buffers beneath them. It is the only way a Pig can be, for he is a Pig and naught else seems right to him but the bloody bishrook mud he leaves behind and the other Pigs around him. If you're not flying with us, you are that mud.
-Emperor Twitchy
from the
Oink Dynasty 2000-2008

-Twitchy
Founder of the Mighty
Pigs on the Wing

I am honored to be your "mud" and "escrement"

 

[PFactorDave]

Suffice to say, the squad belongs to the members, not the man. More so when the man is vacant for a period of time. Twitchy, let the Pigs have the name and find new people to hang around with and rebuild.

I agree with this.  When my squad lost its founder to real life issues, we reformed as necessary under another senior member.  While our CO's departure was on good terms, if it hadn't been I think it would have been wholly appropriate to reform the squad under the name we had.

[Shuffler]

I agree with Del. POTW matured while twich was gone. He should simply start a new squad instead of trying to destroy another.

I agree with this.  When my squad lost its founder to real life issues, we reformed as necessary under another senior member.  While our CO's departure was on good terms, if it hadn't been I think it would have been wholly appropriate to reform the squad under the name we had.

The 80th reformed under a umm a junior member (he's 16 I think).  

He is excellent at augering and he knows how to flip over trees.... pretty much a born leader of our type.

[stodd]

Name it  "Pork.The other wing.   PTOW

[CAP1]

What would be a good name for the new squad ?    

fluffy bunnys?

  

[Shuffler]

fluffy bunnys?

  

Pissed
Off
Twitchy
Wing

[CAP1]

Pissed
Off
Twitchy
Wing

WINNAH!!!

maybe.........