Author Topic: more realistic cargo for the C-47  (Read 904 times)

Offline fbEagle

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 584
more realistic cargo for the C-47
« on: November 27, 2009, 05:31:40 PM »
The real C-47's in WWII could carry 27 commandos in full combat gear. Why can our C-47 only hold 10? Sure it would be harder to kill all of them but think of all the benefits.  :airplane:
<Insert witty remark here>

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2009, 05:39:03 PM »
What benifits? If its perked at 100, then I can see it happening.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10470
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2009, 05:49:53 PM »
The reason it carries 10 troops is because thats all thats needed to capture a base,the other 17 would be redundant.

   :salute

Offline fbEagle

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 584
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2009, 05:55:41 PM »
not necesarily redundant as more backup... if 10 troops get killed then there are 17 more to take there place
<Insert witty remark here>

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2009, 05:58:45 PM »
IIRC HT said that if they used the realistic paratroop capacity for the C47, that they would make captures require 27 troops. It's more of a concession to the base takers than anyone else.

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2009, 06:00:59 PM »
Eagle, if what you want is an insurance policy, then have a buddy or two fly with you.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2009, 07:55:13 PM »
Eagle, if what you want is an insurance policy, then have a buddy or two fly with you.
Friends make the world go 'round.


If you don't have any friends, you could pay for two accounts and have a fbEagle2 as well.
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2009, 04:24:16 AM »
Yes, HT could raise the # of troops required to capture a base to 25 or more. And then yes the C-47 could carry its historic load. But then LVT's and M3's would no longer be able to capture a base. As they were not capable of carrying that many.

Its a minor nod to gameplay, and to those who capture with things other than the C-47.

Offline trigger2

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1342
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2009, 09:21:59 AM »
The reason it carries 10 troops is because that's all that's needed to capture a base,the other 17 would be redundant.

Repetitiously so. :D
Sometimes, we just need to remember what the rules of life really are: You only
need two tools: WD-40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the
WD-40. If it shouldn't move and does, use the duct tape.
*TAs Aerofighters Inc.*

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #9 on: November 28, 2009, 07:08:40 PM »
I love your avatar trigger, I'm stealing it.

But hell, if we get 27 troops in the C-47, and no raise in required troops then all you need is a C-47 and a jeep you can take 3 bases.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline 5PointOh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #10 on: November 28, 2009, 08:21:10 PM »
I'd really like to see the number of troops required for cature go up...just me though,
Coprhead
Wings of Terror
Mossie Student Driver

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #11 on: November 28, 2009, 09:03:40 PM »
I love your avatar trigger, I'm stealing it.

But hell, if we get 27 troops in the C-47, and no raise in required troops then all you need is a C-47 and a jeep you can take 3 bases.
OR 10 C-47s, and you get 27 bases.

durr, I math good. :rolleyes:
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #12 on: November 28, 2009, 09:17:16 PM »
Not if HTC changes it so that a single capture takes 27 troops.

No matter what a C47 in the game carries, it will take one full C-47 to capture the field. He's said it's a gameplay consideration.

Offline Clone155

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 919
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2009, 01:45:51 AM »
Perhaps change C47 troops to paratroopers, m3 and jeep to army, LVT to marines, and sdk-251 to German SS, making the para weaker needing all 27 to take a base, but everything else is regular?

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: more realistic cargo for the C-47
« Reply #14 on: November 29, 2009, 04:22:45 AM »
Perhaps change C47 troops to paratroopers, m3 and jeep to army, LVT to marines, and sdk-251 to German SS, making the para weaker needing all 27 to take a base, but everything else is regular?

Why?


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay