Author Topic: C-46  (Read 2036 times)

Offline JonDoe999

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
      • YouTube - EpicAces's Channel
C-46
« on: November 30, 2009, 10:44:25 AM »
They Should Put On Another Plane That Drops Troops Like The C-46, Or One That Has Machine Guns Or Turrents.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2009, 12:40:36 PM by JonDoe999 »
I ate so much sugar Hallowen night, I gave myself diabetes and gave everyone related to me second- hand diabetes.

:-)

Offline Gabriel

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 207
Re: C-46
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2009, 10:47:07 AM »

Offline ZZee

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
      • POTW
Re: C-46
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2009, 01:00:32 PM »
thinks it been covered before, but.............+1  :aok
POTW 2nd wing

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: C-46
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2009, 03:05:16 PM »
The Urban Dictionary:  Turrent

Quote
1.  turrent  
A common misspelling of the word "turret," usually made by people with a fourth-grade education.



wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline JonDoe999

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
      • YouTube - EpicAces's Channel
Re: C-46
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2009, 05:05:22 PM »
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY WRONWAY??? :confused: :headscratch:
I ate so much sugar Hallowen night, I gave myself diabetes and gave everyone related to me second- hand diabetes.

:-)

Offline Becinhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
Re: C-46
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2009, 07:06:50 PM »
The C-46
I was not aware that we had this plane. How many perks does it cost?
412th Braunco Mustangs OG
412th FNVG FSO
80th FS "Headhunters" MA

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: C-46
« Reply #6 on: November 30, 2009, 08:10:23 PM »
Quote
The C-46
I was not aware that we had this plane. How many perks does it cost?

I think he means C-47  ;)
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: C-46
« Reply #7 on: November 30, 2009, 08:24:00 PM »
I was not aware that we had this plane. How many perks does it cost?


I think he means C-47  ;)
I think he is asking for an alternative to the C-47, such as the C-46, or alternately an (unspecified) transport with defensive armament.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: C-46
« Reply #8 on: November 30, 2009, 10:05:25 PM »
I think he is asking for an alternative to the C-47, such as the C-46, or alternately an (unspecified) transport with defensive armament.

perhaps  :headscratch:
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: C-46
« Reply #9 on: November 30, 2009, 10:10:21 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

Would be a total hangar queen in the Mains. Its armament is negligible (about equivalent to the Kate) and it's even SLOWER than the C-47. And its utility in Special Events is limited.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Clone155

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 918
Re: C-46
« Reply #10 on: November 30, 2009, 10:19:36 PM »
Would be a total hangar queen in the Mains. Its armament is negligible (about equivalent to the Kate) and it's even SLOWER than the C-47. And its utility in Special Events is limited.

Maybe because it would be so slow, give it the historical amount of troops instead of 10 to make up for speed?

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: C-46
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2009, 12:12:25 AM »
Its top speed was about 30-40mph higher than its takeoff speed.....

And making the Ju52 have anything higher than 10 troops would only penalize the C47 pilots, since HT said "I can make it carry any number I want, but it'll still take a full plane to capture a field" [paraphrased].


Meaning, Ju52 carries 20 troops, maprooms now take 20 troops, and C47 pilots get shafted.


10 is chosen for gameplay consideration. It's not a historical number. Ju52 or any other major troop plane in this game would carry 10 as well, just because that's the way the game is played.

Offline Warspawn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 647
Re: C-46
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2009, 12:37:34 AM »



Wouldn't you love to have that at some point?


The Me-323 Gigant would be interesting; could even load up a tank or two to deliver by air.  It had 5 x 13mm MG's for defense....

*edit* doh!:  Waffentraeger (Weapons Carrier)
11 20mm MG 151 cannon
and
4 13mm MG 131 Machine Guns





Interesting.  This plane actually meets requirements to be included at some point...

213 Me 323's were built before production ceased in April 1944. There were several production versions, beginning with the D-1. Later D- and E- versions differed in the choice of power plant and in defensive armament, with improvements in structural strength, total cargo load and fuel capacity also being implemented
« Last Edit: December 01, 2009, 12:45:29 AM by Warspawn »
Purple haze all in my brain
Lately things just don't seem the same
Actin' funny, but I don't know why

'Scuse me while I kiss the sky                 
                                                 --J. Hendrix

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: C-46
« Reply #13 on: December 01, 2009, 01:00:37 AM »
Warspawn: field mod!

Bzzzt! Flag on the play!  :O


But, even if we had it, it wouldn't stop you from being lunchmeat.

It's not as if you're suddenly uber-protected like bombers with 10+ 50cals slaved to one target. It's a single 7mm (13mm??). Like the tailgun on the IL2, you'll maybe get 1 kill in a year with it  :banana:

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: C-46
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2009, 01:07:04 AM »
On a B5N....