Author Topic: C-46  (Read 2041 times)

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: C-46
« Reply #30 on: December 02, 2009, 11:08:00 AM »
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY WRONWAY??? :confused: :headscratch:

     He means your spelling is awful.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: C-46
« Reply #31 on: December 07, 2009, 12:02:48 AM »
As a matter of fact, many many many times. Getting a few hits doesn't stop them from blowing you away. Just puts nice holes in their wings, and they fly away and land your scalps, while you're in the hangar choosing your next plane.

Then it looks like you just aren't very good with it. Iv killed countless planes with the IL2's tail gun without even giving the enemy a chance. Just because you think its worthless doesn't mean it is.
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline JonDoe999

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
      • YouTube - EpicAces's Channel
Re: C-46
« Reply #32 on: December 07, 2009, 03:04:01 PM »
Okay, now I will tell as much as I can about the C-46

From "Airplanes Of The World 1490-1962 By Rolfe

Curtiss C-46 "Commando" Twin-engine U.S. military transport widely used during the war, particularly in flying the "Hump" in China. As a war-surplus, it was still in use as late as 1953.
I ate so much sugar Hallowen night, I gave myself diabetes and gave everyone related to me second- hand diabetes.

:-)

Offline 2ADoc

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 523
Re: C-46
« Reply #33 on: December 08, 2009, 06:22:08 PM »
Do some research on the plane, it was exceptional.  It would haul a load and was a good short field aircraft for its size.  It was huge inside and the cockpit was intimidating.
Takeoffs are optional, landings aren't
Vini Vedi Velcro
See Rule 4, 13, 14.

Offline jay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 889
Re: C-46
« Reply #34 on: December 10, 2009, 01:44:24 AM »
They Should Just Get An Airplane That Carries Troops And Can Protect Itself. :noid

still to early for a C47 with 3 gatlin guns on the side :(
 
"He who makes a beast of himself Gets rid of the pain of being a man." Dr.Johnson


Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: C-46
« Reply #35 on: December 10, 2009, 06:49:41 PM »
I want this



with 10 SEAL's onboard for capturing CV's.
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"

Offline JonDoe999

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
      • YouTube - EpicAces's Channel
Re: C-46
« Reply #36 on: December 10, 2009, 07:05:51 PM »
What is it?  :huh :O :confused: :uhoh :headscratch:
I ate so much sugar Hallowen night, I gave myself diabetes and gave everyone related to me second- hand diabetes.

:-)

Offline Cthulhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2463
Re: C-46
« Reply #37 on: December 10, 2009, 07:36:50 PM »
What is it?  :huh :O :confused: :uhoh :headscratch:

Kids  :rolleyes:

That, is the only aircraft (not flown by puppets) able to both ingress and egress the ocean's surface at great speed, with absolutely no damage, on a weekly basis. :D

(BTW, I only saw it do it in Black & White, your results may vary  ;))
"Think of Tetris as a metaphor for life:  You spend all your time trying to find a place for your long thin piece, then when you finally do, everything you've built disappears"

Offline JonDoe999

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
      • YouTube - EpicAces's Channel
Re: C-46
« Reply #38 on: December 11, 2009, 03:49:10 PM »
Okay.






This topic has so far, did not have any "Add One" though. :(
I ate so much sugar Hallowen night, I gave myself diabetes and gave everyone related to me second- hand diabetes.

:-)

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: C-46
« Reply #39 on: December 11, 2009, 04:52:29 PM »
Kids  :rolleyes:

That, is the only aircraft (not flown by puppets) able to both ingress and egress the ocean's surface at great speed, with absolutely no damage, on a weekly basis. :D

(BTW, I only saw it do it in Black & White, your results may vary  ;))

You're forgetting about this one:



:D
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline warphoenix

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
Re: C-46
« Reply #40 on: December 14, 2009, 01:02:22 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)


Wouldn't you love to have that at some point?


The Me-323 Gigant would be interesting; could even load up a tank or two to deliver by air.  It had 5 x 13mm MG's for defense....

*edit* doh!:  Waffentraeger (Weapons Carrier)
11 20mm MG 151 cannon
and
4 13mm MG 131 Machine Guns

(Image removed from quote.)



Interesting.  This plane actually meets requirements to be included at some point...

213 Me 323's were built before production ceased in April 1944. There were several production versions, beginning with the D-1. Later D- and E- versions differed in the choice of power plant and in defensive armament, with improvements in structural strength, total cargo load and fuel capacity also being implemented
they wouldn't get off the ground in real life(hardley) and the ones that were lucky and did get off the ground etier crashed or were shot down
P-39 FREAK

B-26 Marauder driver

Offline dstrip2

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 57
Re: C-46
« Reply #41 on: December 21, 2009, 03:11:51 AM »
honestly, flying a dang ju52 in WB was tough! it didnt have the power to do NOE really because even the slightest hill was a big deal for it. it was really underpowered. besides, ive landed 3 kills in a c47 before those things are dangerous!  :noid  but i do agree that a different troop carrier would be nice. i still think one that could operate from the CV would add an interesting aspect to the game, such as the good ol dumbo.

Offline Templar

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 189
Re: C-46
« Reply #42 on: December 21, 2009, 03:32:05 PM »
I believe this thread needs to be moved into the Wishlist forum. One defensive MG is better than no defensive MG. +1 for any armed transport plane especially if its an Axis aircraft.
Muhahahahhaa

Offline jollyFE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 593
Re: C-46
« Reply #43 on: December 30, 2009, 06:40:02 AM »
What is it?  :huh :O :confused: :uhoh :headscratch:
Oh man the good old flying sub from the tv show voyage to the bottom of the sea.  Man the seaview ruled way before seaquest DSV.
Every time a Nit vulches,  an angel get it's wings.

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: C-46
« Reply #44 on: December 31, 2009, 10:03:50 AM »
C-46 had a longer range than the C47 or JU-52, It could go faster than both, carry a heavier payload, and I think it had a .50 cal on the back of it.

But, I'd like the JU-52 better myself.