Author Topic: Tools Landing Damage  (Read 5075 times)

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #60 on: December 05, 2009, 01:40:53 AM »
I dont think there is a way to word the bomber message that will fit on a single line.

A couple things that have come to light about these types of missions.

1. The 262 really sucks as a fighter... a true fighter anyway.
2. Furballers make terrible anti-bomber interceptors... just terrible.



 :rofl  Maybe there should be an arena halt so that a pagelong story could be spread across the screen telling the story of the last successfully landing bomber mission from start to finish.

as far as #2 most furballers don't bother climbing to 20-25 k to intercept strat bombers.

.squelch 6 is the answer to the bomber damage/kill 2 line messages.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #61 on: December 05, 2009, 01:52:32 AM »
just another pathetic emo whiner thread  :O
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #62 on: December 05, 2009, 02:34:13 AM »
as far as #2 most furballers don't bother climbing to 20-25 k to intercept strat bombers.

Yes and its their loss.  :D
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #63 on: December 05, 2009, 02:38:05 AM »
Yes and its their loss.  :D

Well then why do you assume they make terrible bomber interceptors?

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27311
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #64 on: December 05, 2009, 10:02:41 AM »
I've thought extensively about it....

I think it's great

They need to add what the ord loadout was so we can judge if they dropped well.

They need to add how many rounds from each machinegun were expended.

They need to add how much fuel they took and used.

They need to add a notation if they took a single or drones.

They need to add how many actually returned if there was three that took off.

They need to add a notation if the pilot was wounded and what position he was in when wounded.

They need to add the distance the flight covered with maximum and minimum alts the mission covered.

They need to add what exactly was destroyed.... ships, guns, armor, buildings.


This could be a great TOOL.
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #65 on: December 05, 2009, 10:07:32 AM »
 :lol
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6646
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #66 on: December 05, 2009, 10:08:36 AM »
They need to add what exactly was destroyed.... ships, guns, armor, buildings.

I was expecting this when they stated bomber damage messages.
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #67 on: December 05, 2009, 01:49:12 PM »
Well then why do you assume they make terrible bomber interceptors?

Because of how easily they die trying to 'pick the prize' off.  :D
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: Tools Landing Damage
« Reply #68 on: December 05, 2009, 01:52:25 PM »
Because of how easily they die trying to 'pick the prize' off.  :D

 :banana: