Author Topic: Subsidized housing paradox.  (Read 914 times)

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
Subsidized housing paradox.
« on: December 03, 2009, 09:33:17 PM »
I guess its a paradox of sorts..

First off this has nothing to do with politics...


Ive worked in the communications industry for 9 years now, much of it doing field work, working on pieces of equipment all over town in various areas, so Ive seen areas progress through the years for nearly a decade..

One thing I keep seeing occurs in subsidized housing, which is they all start out as decent places, and within a few years are pretty nasty.

So They (state I guess, whoever)  want to be able to give people who do not or cannot make much money, a chance to live somewhere other than in a run down shack in a squalid ghetto.  So they build relatively nice homes, and offer them at either a drastically lower cost than they would normally be priced at, OR price them based on a % of the occupants income..

Within a few years, these houses are in severe disrepair, the neighborhood is generally crime ridden, and the basic ambiance of the entire area is pretty nasty.

So now these people have converted their home and neighborhood, into the ghetto they were supposed to be avoiding by living in the subsidized housing.


My theory on this phenomenon is basically that people never appreciate or take care of something they are given, because they didn't earn it...

any other theories?




Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2009, 09:49:29 PM »
I guess its a paradox of sorts..

First off this has nothing to do with politics...


Ive worked in the communications industry for 9 years now, much of it doing field work, working on pieces of equipment all over town in various areas, so Ive seen areas progress through the years for nearly a decade..

One thing I keep seeing occurs in subsidized housing, which is they all start out as decent places, and within a few years are pretty nasty.

So They (state I guess, whoever)  want to be able to give people who do not or cannot make much money, a chance to live somewhere other than in a run down shack in a squalid ghetto.  So they build relatively nice homes, and offer them at either a drastically lower cost than they would normally be priced at, OR price them based on a % of the occupants income..

Within a few years, these houses are in severe disrepair, the neighborhood is generally crime ridden, and the basic ambiance of the entire area is pretty nasty.

So now these people have converted their home and neighborhood, into the ghetto they were supposed to be avoiding by living in the subsidized housing.


My theory on this phenomenon is basically that people never appreciate or take care of something they are given, because they didn't earn it...

any other theories?


None needed, you pretty much nailed it.

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2009, 09:50:57 PM »
We have seen a similar occurance here in Australia, where outback comunities are created because some of the indigineous people of the area were still living in huts and shacks, and wandering the desert like they have been for the last 40,000 years. The nice new houses end up decrepit in a mater of a few years, there is a complete lack of trade qualified people in the area to do anything about it and most of the people disappear back into the desert leaving the "undesireable elements " behind. It clearly shows that anything like this requires long term supervision and maintenance by the body that implemented it. Or just go back to where you started or worse.
aud$0.02
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Dragon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • AH JUGS
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #3 on: December 04, 2009, 10:45:05 AM »
I moved into my house 17 years ago with none of "those" houses on our street and everything looked nice, not perfect, but nice.  Now I know of 7 of them (there could be more) and the large clans of people hanging out on front porches or in the streets smoking weed and drinking are starting to really piss me off.  The properties where they live are beginning to show signs of neglect as well as the vacant houses where they also tend to hang out.

I was hoping to get out of our house in just a few years when the kids finally move out, but now we have to think if we will be able to get any $ for the house if things keep going like they are.


 :furious :furious
SWchef  Lieutenant Colonel  Squadron Training Officer  125th Spartan Warriors

Offline ink

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11274
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2009, 11:12:49 AM »
I just don't give a crap what others do to there, life, house, or property :aok
 now if they were to bring ANY of that "stuff" to MY life, house, property, then is when I would have a say!

and I get really offended when someone tries to dictate how I can live my life!

I recently lived in a smaller town and the neighbors called the Town because me and the wife were sleeping on a enclosed porch,"that was supposed to be used for storage..."  as he said. :mad:

lets say I was a little pissed off when some schmo from the town comes to my appt and tries to dictate where I can sleep,

and I never moved my bed.

Offline CAP1

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22287
      • The Axis Vs Allies Arena
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2009, 11:35:18 AM »
I just don't give a crap what others do to there, life, house, or property :aok
 now if they were to bring ANY of that "stuff" to MY life, house, property, then is when I would have a say!

and I get really offended when someone tries to dictate how I can live my life!

I recently lived in a smaller town and the neighbors called the Town because me and the wife were sleeping on a enclosed porch,"that was supposed to be used for storage..."  as he said. :mad:

lets say I was a little pissed off when some schmo from the town comes to my appt and tries to dictate where I can sleep,

and I never moved my bed.
had neighbors move in a few years back. they never even introduced themselves to me or others in the neighborhood. they did, however have issues with me working on cars in my garage(i used to do side work) and with me working on my race car(which stayed outside sometimes), and even the fact that i kept it outside.
 they never said word one to me......never even called the police on me. they went straight to a friend of theirs what was on the town council. i got letters reminding me that the curfew was 11pm. i always had the door closed when i was using air tools, no later than 9pm. the letter also reminded me that i could not keep an unregistered vehicle on my own property, as it is an attractive nuisance. so i started leaving it on the trailer, as that was ok according to the ordinances. they changed the ordinances.
 at that point in time, the mayor was a friend of mine, so i had a few conversations with him to find out who(i already knew, but wanted to be sure) was complaining. he reinforced my suspicions.
 so for a time, i started keeping the race car inside....even went and bought one of those instant garages to put it in.

 then i took the same stuff i killed the poison ivy in my yard with(it killed everything), and went into their yard in the little hours. within a week, their yard was brown. nothing would grow.  :devil

 they moved eventually.
ingame 1LTCAP
80th FS "Headhunters"
S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning in a Bottle)

Offline Dragon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • AH JUGS
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2009, 11:59:59 AM »
 then i took the same stuff i killed the poison ivy in my yard with(it killed everything), and went into their yard in the little hours. within a week, their yard was brown. nothing would grow.  devil


A buddy of mine took something like that to his own yard to irritate his neighbor - an old retired man that had all the time he needed to keep his yard in perfect condition - that would call council and have letters sent as soon as his grass got above 2 1/2 inches tall.  It took 3 years for grass to be able to grow again and there was nothing that anyone could do about a "strange natural occurrence"   :rofl
SWchef  Lieutenant Colonel  Squadron Training Officer  125th Spartan Warriors

Offline ink

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11274
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2009, 01:44:28 PM »
had neighbors move in a few years back. they never even introduced themselves to me or others in the neighborhood. they did, however have issues with me working on cars in my garage(i used to do side work) and with me working on my race car(which stayed outside sometimes), and even the fact that i kept it outside.
 they never said word one to me......never even called the police on me. they went straight to a friend of theirs what was on the town council. i got letters reminding me that the curfew was 11pm. i always had the door closed when i was using air tools, no later than 9pm. the letter also reminded me that i could not keep an unregistered vehicle on my own property, as it is an attractive nuisance. so i started leaving it on the trailer, as that was ok according to the ordinances. they changed the ordinances.
 at that point in time, the mayor was a friend of mine, so i had a few conversations with him to find out who(i already knew, but wanted to be sure) was complaining. he reinforced my suspicions.
 so for a time, i started keeping the race car inside....even went and bought one of those instant garages to put it in.

 then i took the same stuff i killed the poison ivy in my yard with(it killed everything), and went into their yard in the little hours. within a week, their yard was brown. nothing would grow.  :devil

 they moved eventually.

thats awesome :rofl :rofl

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2009, 05:31:18 PM »
I guess its a paradox of sorts..

First off this has nothing to do with politics...


Ive worked in the communications industry for 9 years now, much of it doing field work, working on pieces of equipment all over town in various areas, so Ive seen areas progress through the years for nearly a decade..

One thing I keep seeing occurs in subsidized housing, which is they all start out as decent places, and within a few years are pretty nasty.

So They (state I guess, whoever)  want to be able to give people who do not or cannot make much money, a chance to live somewhere other than in a run down shack in a squalid ghetto.  So they build relatively nice homes, and offer them at either a drastically lower cost than they would normally be priced at, OR price them based on a % of the occupants income..

Within a few years, these houses are in severe disrepair, the neighborhood is generally crime ridden, and the basic ambiance of the entire area is pretty nasty.

So now these people have converted their home and neighborhood, into the ghetto they were supposed to be avoiding by living in the subsidized housing.


My theory on this phenomenon is basically that people never appreciate or take care of something they are given, because they didn't earn it...

any other theories?







I once did a HUD renovation on a low income apartment complex. The complex got everything new, windows ,doors heating and AC, new appliances, bathrooms, carpet and everything I didn't mention that would make it brand new. Even the outside was completely redone with private patios with nice landscaping. The tenants would periodically stop by and glow with excitement about how nice it was going to be to live in a clean nice place. Another good thing was the rent was not increasing because of the renovations being done. Even the garages were redone inside and had new garage doors with automatic openers.

It was about a month later that I got a call for a few repairs. Upon arriving at the location I was shocked to see just how much the place had gone down hill. All the landscaping was dead or dying. Windows were broken along with doors off the hinges. I met the manager who gave me the list of repairs. The thing was a mile long. When I entered the first few apartments to get a idea what I was looking at . Entering some of these apartments was about as discusting as it gets, dirty diapers just piled up in the corner, dishes piled up in the sink and every inch of counter covered with half eaten food. trash over flowing out of the waste can. I can go on and on but I think by now your getting the picture. After seeing what I was up against I left the last apartment I dared to look through walked over to the manager and said that I would not be back unless the apartments were sanitary to enter. Later that evening i arrived back to the office with a rather nasty voice mail from the property owner telling me I better fix the repairs. I was so pissed that this A-Hole was assuming that these repairs had anything to do with any work done by us that I called him back immediately. I got his voice mail and decided to just leave a message. I told him that he needed to keep a better handle on his property because it was now ready for the wreaking ball. I then told him my next calls were to the head of the city's HUD department, the health department and since the local newspaper did a story on the apartment and since my company was doing the work I was the person interviewed. I said I was also contacting the paper to let them know how bad the place had deterred in only a month and how programs like this just don't work.

 I never heard back form the property owner and I never went back to fix anything. So I can truly relate to your story. That is one reason I feel giving anything for free to people who have no capacity for responsibility is a recipe for disaster.

Offline warhed

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 901
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2009, 05:45:21 PM »
Give an animal food long enough, and the animal stops hunting for it.  I don't see why humans would be any different.  How much money has been given and invested into Africa?  Are they better off with it, or were they hurt by it?
warhed
=Wings of Terror=

"Give me sheep, or give me death!"

Offline CAP1

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22287
      • The Axis Vs Allies Arena
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2009, 05:58:24 PM »
ONe thing i  can add about this. i live in lindenwold nj. small town, used to be really nice, although never a rich town.
 i'm in the "garden lake" section. that is about the last holdout in the town. the rest went to hell. why? thanks to apartments. some of them are subsidized, some aren't. either way, they're what's drug this town through the years.

 now here's the kicker. i pay $5300(ballpark) a year in property taxes. my house is over 100 years old. looks like it was built by drunken monkeys on crack. it's 2 bedroom, 1 bath, small living room, small kitchen. no dining room, no tv room or anything like that.
 property's 120' across the front, and 140' front to back. i added a 2 car garage, seperate from the house about 13 or so years ago.

 neighboring cherry hill(where my shop is), the average house is less then 50 years old. usually 3-4 bedrooms, kitchen dining room, tv room. some are 2 story, some split level. most have finished basements.
 propertys are a little smaller though. usually only around 100x100. most of them have attached 2 car garages.

 they average $6500 or so a year in property taxes. newer homes, better school system, better police and fire depts, better roads, and for all intents and purposes, the same tax rates.
 what kind of bs is that?

 i did have a lawyer friend tell me that in towns with a lot of apts. the property tax goes up for homeowners.....but still...........
ingame 1LTCAP
80th FS "Headhunters"
S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning in a Bottle)

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2009, 06:19:43 PM »
Hey!! I live in an apartment!! what you trying to say :furious



 :D

I agree that low rent apartments are a drag..   but nicer complexes are pretty cool.  My apartments are in the north side of town and in a nice neighborhood, and full of retired people and young professionals.  I had to wait 2 years to get in.   But thats the exception, not the rule these days.  alot of apartments are full of people seemingly trying to hit bottom.

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12881
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2009, 06:29:30 PM »
then i took the same stuff i killed the poison ivy in my yard with(it killed everything), and went into their yard in the little hours. within a week, their yard was brown. nothing would grow.  devil


A buddy of mine took something like that to his own yard to irritate his neighbor - an old retired man that had all the time he needed to keep his yard in perfect condition - that would call council and have letters sent as soon as his grass got above 2 1/2 inches tall.  It took 3 years for grass to be able to grow again and there was nothing that anyone could do about a "strange natural occurrence"   :rofl

2-4-D is a "great natural occurence"  :D
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline Dragon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • AH JUGS
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2009, 06:30:47 PM »

 now here's the kicker. i pay $5300(ballpark) a year in property taxes. my house is over 100 years old. looks like it was built by drunken monkeys on crack. it's 2 bedroom, 1 bath, small living room, small kitchen. no dining room, no tv room or anything like that.
 property's 120' across the front, and 140' front to back. i added a 2 car garage, seperate from the house about 13 or so years ago.


Holy crap, Cap.  I live within Cleveland city limits and have a 3 bedroom, 1 bath, decent LR, no dining room - but a 14 x 10 room off the kitchen on back of house that could be used as one if I didn't have 2 computer desks in it - full basement, half finished in cedar (by me) 1200 square ft house built in 1947 and a 1.5 car detached garage and only pay $1620 per year.  I assume my house it worth quit a bit less than yours though on the retail market.  Mine might sell for 80,000 since I added a huge deck, A/C, new windows, and vinyl siding.  
SWchef  Lieutenant Colonel  Squadron Training Officer  125th Spartan Warriors

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12881
Re: Subsidized housing paradox.
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2009, 06:34:07 PM »
You can get a house like that here for probabally in the $50-60's. Thats mainly because 90% of the factories are gone and there are no jobs here except minimum wage
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women