Author Topic: New cities-new bomber  (Read 1351 times)

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
New cities-new bomber
« on: December 06, 2009, 01:35:13 PM »
B-29. You guessed it. No place for it is no longer a viable reason for rejection. The new cities are perfect for the B-29, and maybe an increase in town size to keep it from wiping out towns in a single pass.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3882
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2009, 01:40:34 PM »
Nemisis=Wishlist warrior
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5937
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2009, 01:49:27 PM »
B-29. You guessed it. No place for it is no longer a viable reason for rejection. The new cities are perfect for the B-29, and maybe an increase in town size to keep it from wiping out towns in a single pass.

No thanks.  Given all of the other unrealistic facets of bombers in AH, it would simply become a totally unbalancing Stuka-Deathstar-Acrobat.

All of the above is IMHO, of course.  :salute


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2009, 01:52:01 PM »
yeah, lancstukas would be 10 times worse. Does anyone know when it started or who started it? Or is it something thats just always been around?
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2009, 01:52:45 PM »
B-29. You guessed it. No place for it is no longer a viable reason for rejection. The new cities are perfect for the B-29, and maybe an increase in town size to keep it from wiping out towns in a single pass.
There are far more planes to be added before the B-29, mainly to flesh out the painfully sparse Russian and Japanese planesets. Think with your dipstick Jimmy!
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline stodd

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2009, 02:06:04 PM »
Nemisis=Wishlist warrior
:rofl :aok
yeah, lancstukas would be 10 times worse. Does anyone know when it started or who started it? Or is it something thats just always been around?
:rofl :huh Me?
Stodd/ CandyMan
I don't get why you even typed that, you know it's stupid.


Offline Skulls22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 693
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2009, 03:19:48 PM »
Where are you gonna take off? runways to small. sooooo.......




























Nope!
(In game Sparty)
R.I.P. SASFRAS, may you return some day soon
<S>

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15644
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2009, 05:32:39 PM »
NO.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Clone155

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 918
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2009, 06:28:33 PM »
+1

P.S. I count as 10 people so all your no votes don't count now  :D

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2009, 06:28:51 PM »
 We need someone to attach a "Face Palm" or "Epic Fail" pic to this thread, as a warning to newcomers.

 

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2009, 06:32:02 PM »
Could just as easily, of not more so, argue that the new cities mean we need the He111.

B-29 was not remotely close to the only bomber that indiscriminately bombed cities.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline stodd

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2009, 06:32:19 PM »
We need someone to attach a "Face Palm" or "Epic Fail" pic to this thread, as a warning to newcomers.

 
:D
Stodd/ CandyMan
I don't get why you even typed that, you know it's stupid.


Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7357
      • FullTilt
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2009, 06:40:19 PM »
Mossie B MkXVI
1 x 4000lb cookie
Formation enabled...........

35K and moderately fast
Ludere Vincere

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2009, 06:54:54 PM »
Think with your dipstick Jimmy!

i love saying this lol
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17717
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: New cities-new bomber
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2009, 08:38:55 PM »
Think with your dipstick Jimmy!


i love saying this lol


I just love whacking people with the dipstick  :devil


oh and no frickin way for the B29, and as a side suggestion, I think all who request the B29 be suspended from the game for a month.   :neener:
« Last Edit: December 06, 2009, 08:40:44 PM by The Fugitive »