Author Topic: Yak-3  (Read 2216 times)

Offline sandwich

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 590
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #30 on: December 18, 2009, 06:47:57 PM »
The 3P model was produced very late war.  Started production in April 1945.  It's borderline on whether it meets HTC's inclusion criteria.  Don't get me wrong, I would love to have it!

so add it with a perk value.  :D


Offline wgmount

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #31 on: December 19, 2009, 04:06:25 PM »
The 3P model was produced very late war.  Started production in April 1945.  It's borderline on whether it meets HTC's inclusion criteria.  Don't get me wrong, I would love to have it!

So what's HTC's inclusion criteria? They added the Tempest and I have not seen one v1 buzz bomb for it to shoot down. That plane has no use except for ho's. Try to use it against gv's which was its primary function and see how much grumbling goes on. Add the Yak3 great fighter plane. Faster and more maneuverable than the supermarine spitfire.
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands,
hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."- H.L. Mencken

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #32 on: December 19, 2009, 06:08:43 PM »
He's talking about, specifically, the Yak 3P model, not the Yak 3 itself.

Quote
They added the Tempest and I have not seen one v1 buzz bomb for it to shoot down. That plane has no use except for ho's.
That plane is one of the better overall fighters in the game and probably the best boom and zoomer....

Quote
Try to use it against gv's which was its primary function and see how much grumbling goes on.
Why would you care? GV's are there to bomb. So bomb them.

Quote
Add the Yak3 great fighter plane. Faster and more maneuverable than the supermarine spitfire.
I can't imagine it was faster or significantly more maneuverable than the Spitfire MK XIV... that said it would likely be a better fighter.


That said... Yak 3 :aok
Also... Yak 1, 1b :aok
and Yak 7 :aok

Offline wgmount

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #33 on: December 20, 2009, 03:17:59 AM »
I can't imagine it was faster or significantly more maneuverable than the Spitfire MK XIV... that said it would likely be a better fighter.

Yak 3

 Performance:
            Maximum Speed: 407 mph
            Ceiling: 35,105 ft.
            Range: 559 miles

Spitfire MK VA

  Performance:
            Maximum Speed: 369 mph
            Ceiling: 36,500 ft.
            Range: 1,135 miles

YAK 1 was a YAK 3 that didn't run well. YAK 7 was a yak 3 that carried bombs.
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands,
hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."- H.L. Mencken

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7357
      • FullTilt
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #34 on: December 20, 2009, 05:44:29 AM »


YAK 1 was a YAK 3 that didn't run well. YAK 7 was a yak 3 that carried bombs.

Yak 3 was a design derivation of the Yak 1M ( a Yak1 with latest power plant, shorter wing and lighter construction)
Yak7  (series..there were several of them) was a design based upon a trainer developed to train pilots for the Yak1
Yak9  (series) was a design derivation of the Yak7D (Di) ( a Yak 7 with slightly shorter wings and latest power plant)
Yak9T had a longer nose (cockpit moved back)for the bigger cannon which was retained on the Yak9M ( It was a Yak9D in a Yak9T body) and the Yak9U (to house the bigger V107 engine)
Ludere Vincere

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #35 on: December 20, 2009, 08:29:48 AM »
Yak 3

 Performance:
            Maximum Speed: 407 mph
            Ceiling: 35,105 ft.
            Range: 559 miles

Spitfire MK VA

  Performance:
            Maximum Speed: 369 mph
            Ceiling: 36,500 ft.
            Range: 1,135 miles


Bravo.. now why don't you compare it to the MK XIV. :rolleyes:
See Rule #4

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #36 on: December 20, 2009, 12:06:44 PM »
Yak 3

 Performance:
            Maximum Speed: 407 mph
            Ceiling: 35,105 ft.
            Range: 559 miles

Spitfire MK VA

  Performance:
            Maximum Speed: 369 mph
            Ceiling: 36,500 ft.
            Range: 1,135 miles

YAK 1 was a YAK 3 that didn't run well. YAK 7 was a yak 3 that carried bombs.
Awesome you compared a 1941/2 version of the Spitfire to a 1944/45 version of the Yak :aok
The Yak 1 was the best fighter in the VVS at the opening of Operation Barbarossa, and the Yak 7 was developed from a trainer version as Tilt said... eventually evolved into the Yak 9.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2009, 12:12:13 PM by Motherland »

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10079
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #37 on: March 16, 2010, 02:03:51 PM »
Ooops.  My finger hit the enter button.  *BUMP*
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #38 on: March 16, 2010, 03:10:07 PM »
bump diddy bump bump! :lol
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #39 on: March 16, 2010, 04:18:08 PM »
The 3P model was produced very late war.  Started production in April 1945.  It's borderline on whether it meets HTC's inclusion criteria.  Don't get me wrong, I would love to have it!

Quite a bit of information on the Yaks available; if you поймите русский язык

...and again...
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline jdbecks

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #40 on: March 16, 2010, 05:49:35 PM »
how did the yaks compare to migs? what did the pilots prefer to fly if they had flown both?
JG11

...Only the proud, only the strong...
www.JG11.org

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #41 on: March 16, 2010, 06:00:46 PM »
how did the yaks compare to migs? what did the pilots prefer to fly if they had flown both?
The Yak-1 was really the only really good fighter the Soviet Union had at the outbreak of the war. The MiG-3 pretty much sucked; it's often cited as the exception that makes the well repeated rule, 'if it looks right it is right'.

Offline Impakt

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 141
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #42 on: March 16, 2010, 11:19:00 PM »
It would be my main ride. Yak-9U is in my top three as it is. The plane is in the other game, and under 15,600 feet it is very dominant. Nothing can climb with it and I think the acceleration is tops at those lower alts. It gives 190s and 38s fits. I think it is really (in that game) most effective BnZ and just use the maneuverability as a defensive/ escape/ rtb asset---along with the acceleration. So---YES!!


+ FAFL ALSACE 341 +

In game handle = Impaktt

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #43 on: March 17, 2010, 06:04:26 AM »
It would be my main ride. Yak-9U is in my top three as it is. The plane is in the other game, and under 15,600 feet it is very dominant. Nothing can climb with it and I think the acceleration is tops at those lower alts. It gives 190s and 38s fits. I think it is really (in that game) most effective BnZ and just use the maneuverability as a defensive/ escape/ rtb asset---along with the acceleration. So---YES!!
IN THAT GAME...  :lol
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: Yak-3
« Reply #44 on: March 17, 2010, 08:49:07 AM »
Bring it on. I Love the Yaks. :aok

+1.  Very tough opponents if flown by someone who knows what they're doing.

Probably the only EAC I think twice about engaging depending on the situation.