Author Topic: Hawker Tempest MK V  (Read 2008 times)

Offline Minotaur

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Hawker Tempest MK V
« on: November 07, 1999, 12:32:00 AM »
HTC;

I know this plane does not hit "The 20 most wished for planes this Christmas!".  Please take a closer look at it.

This plane defines "Rolling Thunder".
 http://www.accessweb.com/users/mconstab/tempest.htm

The Tempest has almost P-51 speed, matches FW-190 4x20mm cannon and altitude performance, and is the only plane to sport a 5 bladed propeller.  This one is a brute, call it "Big Mo".  Or should it be "Big Mah"?  

I am sure this next one will get done right after Christmas, I can't wait!
 http://www.compass.dircon.co.uk/Hayate.htm

And, of course this one also...
 http://www.inn.nl/~menace/images/gallery4/image21.htm

Mino


Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 1999, 07:10:00 AM »
Huh? The Griffon-engined Spitfires usually had 5 blade props, and some 6 blade contra-rotating props, but the Tempest only had 4.

I think the Tempest V would be a good alternative to the Spitfire XIV. Less climb and lower ceiling, but with better guns and high-speed handling. Can carry 8 rockets too.  

Offline Minotaur

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 130
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 1999, 07:36:00 AM »
Juzz;

Oops, thanks.

I guess the Tempest MK V had only 4 blades.  I was looking at the Tempest Sea Fury and got confused.  
 http://search.totavia.com/gallery/markm/markm06.htm

DUH!  

Mino

[This message has been edited by Minotaur (edited 11-07-1999).]

funked

  • Guest
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 1999, 10:00:00 AM »
Only 400 Tempest V were in service during WW2.

Offline Curly

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 1999, 11:03:00 AM »

 and how many TA152's and DO335's ????

Curly


Werewolf

  • Guest
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 1999, 12:05:00 PM »
Even if i am a LW preferring guy the tempest seems to be interesting. (Don't forget the Ta 152 if it happens to see virtual service)
Counting numbers the Typhoon seems to be more interesting though.

werewo

funked

  • Guest
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 1999, 12:20:00 PM »
There were maybe 150 Ta 152's built.  Probably only a dozen or so made it into combat.

As far as I know the Do 335 was not issued to a combat unit.

Offline fats

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 210
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 1999, 12:54:00 PM »
How many planes did LW have serviceable at the time when Ta 152 was in service. How many planes did the Brits have serviceable when the Tempest was in service?

Guess which one, Ta 152 or Tempest, made up a bigger chunk of the operational air force?

//fats


-kier-

  • Guest
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 1999, 01:50:00 PM »
I don't think production of a/c was Germany's main problem; lack of oil, fuel, and trained pilots was.

funked

  • Guest
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 1999, 02:25:00 PM »
Yeah that's true.  I have a Luftwaffe "Order of Battle" from April 1945 that lists strength of each unit.  I'll look at the exact totals tonight, but the proportion of Ta 152's was still bloody low.

Nath-BDP

  • Guest
Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 1999, 12:11:00 AM »
The first Tempest Mk V's first saw service in April 1944, first two units to be equiped with the Mk V were Nos 3 and 486 Squadrons.
The first 600 a/c were ordered in 2/42 the first of these a/c flew in 6/43.

The Mk V was actually very successfull against the V-1's shooting down 638 of 1,771 of them between middle of June and early 9/44.  However, one of the major problems of the Mk V was overspeeding of the propeller resulting in a failure of the engine lubrication system, this problem was quickly resolved by the indroduction of modified propellers.  

In terms of performance the Mk V was comparable to the D-9 in which it was 9 mph faster and had a considerable lower wing loading per sq/ft, 38 compared to the D-9's 48 (woah), just imagine a Ta-152! The Hawker had a superior climb at 4,700 ft/min, D-9, 4,200ft/min.  However the Hawker's main forte was at low to medium altitudes while leaving high alt fighting to the spit XIV which was superior to the FW 190A and 109G.

805 Mk V's were built.

------------------
"Then I played the trump. The Spitfire was clawing wildly through the air, trying to follow me in a roll, when I dropped the nose. The Thunderbolt howled and ran for earth. Barely had the Spitfire started to follow--and I was a long way ahead of him by now--when I jerked back on the stick and threw the Jug into a zoom climb. In a straight or turning climn, the British ship had the advantage. But coming out of a dive, there's not a British or a German fighter that can come close to a Thunderbolt rushing upward in a zoom. Before the Spit pilot knew what had happened, I was high above him, the Thunderbolt hammering around. And that was it--for in the next few moments the Spitfire flier was amazed to see a less maneuverable, slow-climbing Thunderbolt rushing straight at him, eight guns pointed ominously at his cockpit."

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #11 on: June 03, 2013, 09:57:33 PM »
The increase in performance between the early series Tempest V with low-boost Sabre IIA..
..through to post-war Tempest F6  with high-boost ADI-equipped Sabres is significant..

From ~376mph @ S-L, & 426mph @ ~18,000ft for early MkV..
..to ..~390mph @ S-L, &  435mph @ ~18,000 -for later [but still wartime] Mk V..
..to ..~418mph @ S-L, &  455mph @ ~18,000ft for F6 Tempest..

Are these performance increases available/relflected in the game?

I'll post ref's on req'..
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #12 on: June 03, 2013, 10:07:20 PM »
JAW, you just replied to a thread from 1999.  Yes, fourteen years ago.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline bacon8tr

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 735
Re: Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #13 on: June 03, 2013, 10:08:27 PM »
  :noid  :bolt: waiting for the assorted necro bump pics.

Offline RedBull1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: Hawker Tempest MK V
« Reply #14 on: June 03, 2013, 10:38:29 PM »
Dude...I was three years old last time this thread was on the front page  :rofl
"There is absolutely no point discussing anything on the BBS, it's mostly populated by people who are right about everything, no one listens and everyone is just talking. People will argue over the shape of an egg." -Anonymous