« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Auto rear gunners  (Read 1254 times)

Offline haggerty

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 879
      • Facebook
Auto rear gunners
« on: December 23, 2009, 09:58:56 PM »
I dont think it would be a bad addition if rear gunners on planes such as the IL2, 110, SBD, TBM, etc... be made to auto fire like the ack on airbases.  Not as accurate as a human controlled gunner could fire, but atleast something that has a chance of hitting if the bogey hangs around long enough.
There is really no purpose to gun for someone score wise, and its not really feasable to ask for a gunner every time you take off.  Human manpower is limited.  I dont believe you should need 2 human players to take full use of an airplane.  Strategic level bombers I can understand having to gun yourself...but single or dual engined attack planes I think should have this option.
Logged
-Ninja250, -Spectre, -UBerHAGS, -FieroGT, -Haggerty, -Hellcat -Misawa, -Gloom -Nobunaga -Cobrakai

Offline donna43

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 233
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2009, 10:02:50 PM »
Sounds good to me.  :joystick:
Logged
DrPhloxx

Age is strictly a case of mind over matter.
If you don't mind, it doesn't matter.

Offline Clone155

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2009, 10:04:29 PM »
Not on the IL2, that thing is border line 20mm
Logged

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2009, 10:29:04 PM »
No otto weenies please
Logged
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Templar

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 189
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #4 on: December 23, 2009, 10:40:14 PM »
+1  :airplane:  :airplane:
Logged
Muhahahahhaa

Offline fudgums

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3933
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #5 on: December 23, 2009, 10:52:47 PM »
-1
Logged
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline saantana

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 763
      • Dywizjon 308
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #6 on: December 23, 2009, 11:03:47 PM »
Quote from: haggerty on December 23, 2009, 09:58:56 PM
I dont think it would be a bad addition if rear gunners on planes such as the IL2, 110, SBD, TBM, etc... be made to auto fire like the ack on airbases.  Not as accurate as a human controlled gunner could fire, but atleast something that has a chance of hitting if the bogey hangs around long enough.
There is really no purpose to gun for someone score wise, and its not really feasable to ask for a gunner every time you take off.  Human manpower is limited.  I dont believe you should need 2 human players to take full use of an airplane.  Strategic level bombers I can understand having to gun yourself...but single or dual engined attack planes I think should have this option.

No.

-1
Logged
Saantana
308 Polish Squadron RAF
http://dywizjon308.servegame.org

"I have fought a good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept my faith"

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #7 on: December 23, 2009, 11:13:39 PM »
Quote from: haggerty on December 23, 2009, 09:58:56 PM
I dont think it would be a bad addition if rear gunners on planes such as the IL2, 110, SBD, TBM, etc... be made to auto fire like the ack on airbases.  Not as accurate as a human controlled gunner could fire, but atleast something that has a chance of hitting if the bogey hangs around long enough.
There is really no purpose to gun for someone score wise, and its not really feasable to ask for a gunner every time you take off.  Human manpower is limited.  I dont believe you should need 2 human players to take full use of an airplane.  Strategic level bombers I can understand having to gun yourself...but single or dual engined attack planes I think should have this option.

all these planes except for the il2 (used mainly as tank killers ) are used as fighters and some are really good at killing.  having auto gun would make them more effective figher hunters.  I would say no. and actually all the level buffs are the one's that need auto gunners.  but then again, i think 999 already has them.  he just dont wanna share the code  :uhoh J/k.

semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2009, 12:28:16 AM »
Yes. There is already a virtual man sitting in the back seat, what is he doing? Sleeping? I'd like to think not. Let's have him fire his damn gun so I don't have to climb back and forth from my pilot's seat trying to bomb/strafe takes while trying to pop a bandit on my six.

Here's a compromise for those that don't want it. Give them an option to turn it off.
Logged
Quote from: DA98 on March 25, 2011, 09:05:45 AM
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4032
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2009, 12:31:11 AM »
No. I don't care if it's a pea-shooter, or 50cal. No auto rear gunnery. Too much "what can make the game easier for me?" stuff.
Logged
Former C.O. 91st Bombardment Group (Heavy)
"The Ragged Irregulars"

Offline Oleg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1000
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2009, 01:35:07 AM »
Speaking from WB experience, auto gunners can be either "useless" or "deadly", no intermediate states. I definitely dont want neither 1st in my plane nor 2nd in enemies.

Get a gunner.
Logged
"If you don't like something, change it. If you can't change it, change your attitude. Don't complain."
Maya Angelou

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2009, 03:17:13 AM »
+1  :aok
Nice idea for those planes with a feeble rear gunner.
Logged
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2009, 04:15:38 AM »
What, import Otto Der Meister-Gunner from Woebirds? No way. Na. No. Not ever. Unless we introduce the Boulton Paul Defiant turret-fighter, in which case yes please, then we Brits will retire our Spitfires and Hurricanes in favour of the Four-Gun Beast and become masters of the AH sky.

 :cool:

Logged
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline LCCajun

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2009, 07:46:41 AM »
-200
Logged
Ingame ID: Cajon

"SlapShot
There is no shame in putting up a good fight and dieing."
"You never know how strong you are til being strong is the only choice you have" Unknown author

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Re: Auto rear gunners
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2009, 08:14:07 AM »
Never!

Otto singlehandedly was the source of more gnashing of teeth, tearing out of hair, wailing and moaning to the "Gods" than almost any other single feature.

Hitech has built "Much" better this time.

You can get someone to join you in flight, can leave again in flight.
You can man the guns yourself while you have a gunner in a drone.

But we do NOT need or want Otto.

Otto is for the lazy and incompetent.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »