Author Topic: battleships  (Read 3590 times)

Offline Eric122

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
Re: battleships
« Reply #45 on: March 21, 2010, 03:42:04 PM »
The NC class would be great! I live about 2hrs away from the Showboat and it is sweet! Would love to fire the 16inchers at an airfield or another cv group. She also made it on the TOP 10 Naval Ships at like #4 or something. Also, during her first engagement alongside the Enterprise, the Enterprise's captain was worried she was on fire because of all the smoke she was puttin out due to her tremendous firepower!  :devil

+1


i noticed every time i go the rear 16 in gun is aimed at either the coast guard or one of the many buildings across the river

Offline Eric122

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
Re: battleships
« Reply #46 on: March 30, 2010, 04:54:01 PM »
North Carolina class NO
Iowa Class YES

the N.C. class was ranked #6 in the top 10 fighting ships list

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: battleships
« Reply #47 on: March 31, 2010, 06:33:55 AM »
"the HMS Hood"

Groan, another one who doesn't know how to properly name a ship of the Royal Navy. It's Hood, the Hood or H.M.S. Hood, NOT 'the H.M.S. Hood'.

 :cool:  
since when has HMS Hood been called a BB anyways? :lol Battle Cruiser man
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: battleships
« Reply #48 on: April 01, 2010, 06:32:30 PM »
Spot-on, H.M.S. Hood was a battle-cruiser: the biggest and best in the world when she was built but, like all battle-cruisers, inadequately armoured when it came to fighting true battleships.

 :cool:
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline USRanger

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10325
      • BoP Home
Re: battleships
« Reply #49 on: April 01, 2010, 06:51:15 PM »
HMS Hood & a few other ship in-port:


Axis vs Allies Staff Member
☩ JG11 Sonderstaffel ☩
Flying 'Black[Death] 10' ☩JG11☩

Only the Proud, Only the Strong Ne Desit Virtus

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: battleships
« Reply #50 on: April 01, 2010, 07:00:31 PM »
HMS Hood & a few other ship in-port:



Where'd u get this pic? Looks nice
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5566
Re: battleships
« Reply #51 on: April 01, 2010, 07:23:50 PM »
Iowa class.



-Spektor
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline USRanger

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10325
      • BoP Home
Re: battleships
« Reply #52 on: April 01, 2010, 07:28:37 PM »
Axis vs Allies Staff Member
☩ JG11 Sonderstaffel ☩
Flying 'Black[Death] 10' ☩JG11☩

Only the Proud, Only the Strong Ne Desit Virtus

Offline RipChord929

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: battleships
« Reply #53 on: April 02, 2010, 07:07:26 AM »
North Carolina?  fightingest ship? Hmmmmm?

If you judge fightin by, how many engagements the ship participated in, it would be a cruiser for sure, not ANY BB!
USS San Francisco, would be an excellent candidate!

Among BB afficionado's, there are two separate groups of BB's.  Those that 'Did', and those that 'Never Did'...
Those that actually Did, are a very small group indeed!   Did or Didn't what, right, lol? A real BB lover would know the diff!

been gone for awhile...
 :salute RC 
"Well Cmdr Eddington, looks like we have ourselves a war..."
"Yeah, a gut bustin, mother lovin, NAVY war!!!"

Offline SuBWaYCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: battleships
« Reply #54 on: April 02, 2010, 11:59:29 AM »
KMS Scharnhorst and its sistership Gneisenau.
Axis C.O. for Battle of the Dnieper, Winter '43

Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, on land, and in the air. - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder

364th Chawks

Offline mbailey

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5677
Re: battleships
« Reply #55 on: April 02, 2010, 01:58:45 PM »
KMS Scharnhorst and its sistership Gneisenau.


Yes Please +1
Mbailey
80th FS "Headhunters"

Ichi Go Ichi E
Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

When the game is over, the Kings and Pawns all go into the same box.

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: battleships
« Reply #56 on: April 03, 2010, 03:01:24 PM »
     I think in terms of AH, there would be little difference between a North Carolina class and
an Iowa class BB.  The speed differential and the number of AAA mounts wouldn't be all that
big a deal.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline SDGhalo

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 109
Re: battleships
« Reply #57 on: April 03, 2010, 05:05:43 PM »
other then a battle ship how about maybe putting in destroyer and i think the tribal class would do awesome in AH


 Type: Destroyer
Displacement: 1,850 tons (standard),
2,520 tons (full)
Length: 377 ft (115 m) Length overall
Beam: 36.5 ft (11.1 m)
Draught: 9 ft (2.7 m)
Propulsion: 3 x Admiralty 3-drum boilers, 2 Parsons steam turbines on 2 shafts, 44,000 shp
Speed: 36 knots (67 km/h)
Range: 524 tons oil, 5,700 nautical miles (10,600 km) at 15 knots (28 km/h)
Complement: 190 (219 as leader)
Armament: As designed:
8 x 4.7 inch QF Mark XII (L/45) , twin mount CP Mk. XIX
4 x QF 2 pdr, quad mount Mk. VII
8 x Vickers .50 machine gun, quad mount Mk. II
4 x tubes for 21 inch torpedo Mk.IX
1 x rack, 2 x throwers for depth charges
War modifications:

6 x 4.7 inch L/45 QF Mk. XII, 3 x twin mounting CP Mk. XIX
1 x twin QF 4-inch (101.6 mm) Mk. XVI, mounting HA Mk. XIX
4 x QF 2 pdr, quad mount Mk. VII
up to 4 x single and twin 20 mm Oerlikon
1 quad launcher with Mk. IX torpedoes (4 x 21-inch torpedo tubes)
1 x rack, 2 x throwers for DCs
Cayuga, Athabaskan as built:

8 x QF 4-inch (101.6 mm) Mk. XVI, twin mount HA/LA Mk. XIX
6 x QF 40 mm Bofors
1 x twin mount Mk. V
4 x single mount Mk. III
1 quad launcher with Mk. IX torpedoes (4 x 21-inch torpedo tubes)
1 x rack, 2 x throwers for DCs
Canadian DDE modernization:

2 x 4"/45 Mk XVI twin guns
1 x 3"/50 Mk.33 twin guns
4 x 40mm/56 Bofors guns
1 quad launcher with Mk. IX torpedoes (4 x 21" torpedo tubes)
2 x Squid anti-submarine mortars
 

Offline RipChord929

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: battleships
« Reply #58 on: April 04, 2010, 05:45:53 AM »
Yes, adding a player spawnable DD would be a great add to the game!
But that topic has been beaten to death by many on this forum..
I don't really feel like doing it all over again, But I'd vote a BIG YES on that, (if there WAS a vote, lol)

RC
"Well Cmdr Eddington, looks like we have ourselves a war..."
"Yeah, a gut bustin, mother lovin, NAVY war!!!"

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: battleships
« Reply #59 on: April 04, 2010, 02:20:57 PM »
I'll reiterate my opinion that having a US task group it would be nice for  a BB task group to be based on non-US equipment.  I'd argue that Japanese equipment makes the most sense as the Pacific war, with the US and Japan being the major participants, was the more major naval aspect of WWII.  Thus a Japanese BB group formed around a Yamato or Nagato class BB with a couple Takao class CAs and a screen of Akizuki class DDs would add a nice dash of variety to AH.  Not everything has to be based on US equipment.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-