Author Topic: ME-262 pilots  (Read 7591 times)

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #30 on: January 23, 2010, 10:16:40 AM »
From my 234.

A fix is needed than as the cannons in the 234 were only capable of firing to the dead 6. Besides, why is there cannons as the canons were only fitted to test a/c, so should be deleted.

Offline TwinTail

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 508
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #31 on: January 23, 2010, 12:04:21 PM »
He wa shooting straight back, its called using your rudder fyi
d-40 and d-11 easily out turn a spixteen
==*Top Gun*==
TwinTail

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #32 on: January 23, 2010, 05:34:25 PM »
He wa shooting straight back, its called using your rudder fyi
Word. So, milo, how many lessons can I put you down for at Spikes' Top Gun Arado Academy?
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #33 on: January 23, 2010, 06:57:30 PM »
A fix is needed than as the cannons in the 234 were only capable of firing to the dead 6. Besides, why is there cannons as the canons were only fitted to test a/c, so should be deleted.
No they weren't. Guess we should take out the P51 too or something in the MA since they didn't shoot at eachother in real war.

I flipped my rudder to the left while firing...if you don't believe I'll be glad to show you. :)
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Estes

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3647
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2010, 07:05:12 PM »
Jet bomber dweeb. :) I fly the 262 like a man. Ram the crap outta people.

Offline warphoenix

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2010, 08:48:23 PM »
Jet bomber dweeb. :) I fly the 262 like a man. Ram the crap outta people.
did you ram one of my friends in the MALB on 11/29/2009 right in front of a B24? because that might have been me in the B24
P-39 FREAK

B-26 Marauder driver

Offline Estes

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3647
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2010, 09:19:22 PM »
Ill hafta consult with my little black book, simply called "Kjetils Rams" but its a definite possibility.

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #37 on: January 24, 2010, 01:36:11 AM »
TRY TO STAY ON TOPIC BUT DONT!!!

GEEEEZ CANT YOU GUYS FOLLOW DERECTIENZ!?!?!
.........No :lol

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #38 on: January 24, 2010, 09:05:16 AM »
Word. So, milo, how many lessons can I put you down for at Spikes' Top Gun Arado Academy?

Not from you, be sure. :) If rudder was used, then the fuselage would turn and the guns would STILL be firing dead astern. :devil

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #39 on: January 24, 2010, 09:10:14 AM »
No they weren't. Guess we should take out the P51 too or something in the MA since they didn't shoot at eachother in real war.

I flipped my rudder to the left while firing...if you don't believe I'll be glad to show you. :)

If you put in left rudder, the a/c would have turned left pointing the tail to the right. :O Hard to hit an a/c that is at the 7 o'clock position. :x

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #40 on: January 24, 2010, 11:56:01 AM »
By ruddering left I meant swinging the plane left while looking backwards, which is normally the way im looking anyway. So technically you are turning right.
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #41 on: January 24, 2010, 12:59:45 PM »
First time I upped a 262 and got off the gound with it, I got shot down by an arado. I was dumb and came it dead 6 on it. That was really embarassing when people found out. Squadies started blabbing.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6732
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #42 on: January 24, 2010, 03:55:25 PM »
I only fly the 262 on the deck, looking for unweary pilots gone to the kitchen to get a snack.
:aok A rare display of honesty among 262 sticks!
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15549
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #43 on: February 03, 2010, 02:38:55 AM »
For the Me 262 experten, there is the upcoming scenario "The Final Battle".  You can come teach late-war allied planes a lesson -- if you've got the teaching ability. :)

http://ahevents.org/pacific-theatre/current-or-next-scenario.html

Offline PanosGR

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 534
Re: ME-262 pilots
« Reply #44 on: February 03, 2010, 05:03:56 AM »
only thing that bothers me in AH 262 is the total carefree engine management. You can increase or reduce your throttle practically numerous times in a sec and your engine keep working like nothing happent. In RL that was not the case. The engine management required almost all off the pilot dedication plus he had to be real gentle when he touched the throttle otherwise the engine would suffer by overheats or even totally failure. I'm afraid that 262 engine management in AH is not realistic.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2010, 05:06:57 AM by PanosGR »