Author Topic: 20 mm in action  (Read 3579 times)

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Re: 20 mm in action
« Reply #45 on: January 21, 2010, 01:49:38 PM »
I read a great write up on how Japanese over claiming might well have really impacted the battle of Guadalcanal. All counties over claimed of course. But the Japanese penny packeted the attacks at cactus, because it was so far, and because they thought they had repeatedly wiped it out.
We can presume that a P36 is in the same range as a P40 for robustness. Its now F4F-4 but obviosly a pretty hardy plane. I do not know if that one would have made it home if it wasnt almost over its base and fighting Zeros that were almost all ammo expended already.
Have you read "The first team" series Karnak? If you haven't you must. Fantastic books.
http://www.amazon.ca/First-Team-Pacific-Combat-Harbor/dp/159114471X/ref=pd_sim_b_1
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 03:16:00 PM by Pongo »

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: 20 mm in action
« Reply #46 on: January 21, 2010, 02:14:54 PM »
Nope, I haven't.  I'll have to look into that.

Interestingly, in that article, the P-36 you showed photos of was not claimed as a kill by the Zero pilots who hit it.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: 20 mm in action
« Reply #47 on: January 21, 2010, 02:23:10 PM »
We can presume that a P36 is in the same range as a P40 for robustness.

Yeh, the airframe is basically as in the P-40B with minor differencies. P-36 was stressed for 12Gs (!!!) at 2500kg weight. While the weight is rather low compared to P-40B's normal take off weight for example, and it doesn't directly apply to enduring battle damage, it still tells us something about the airframe's robustness IMO.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 02:31:32 PM by Wmaker »
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: 20 mm in action
« Reply #48 on: January 21, 2010, 11:54:00 PM »
Yeh, the airframe is basically as in the P-40B with minor differencies. P-36 was stressed for 12Gs (!!!) at 2500kg weight. While the weight is rather low compared to P-40B's normal take off weight for example, and it doesn't directly apply to enduring battle damage, it still tells us something about the airframe's robustness IMO.

sounds like a good candidate for AH hangers.   :salute
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Re: 20 mm in action
« Reply #49 on: January 22, 2010, 01:43:51 AM »
Nope, I haven't.  I'll have to look into that.

Interestingly, in that article, the P-36 you showed photos of was not claimed as a kill by the Zero pilots who hit it.

to me it looks like it must have been a pretty steep deflection shot.

Offline Demetrious

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: 20 mm in action
« Reply #50 on: January 25, 2010, 08:47:04 PM »
sounds like a good candidate for AH hangers.   :salute

It would be, actually. If the Brewster could make it, the P-36 would do fine too (which was also used by the Finns in the Winter War to good effect.) It's already in WWII Online and holds it's own against early FW-190s and Emils.

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: 20 mm in action
« Reply #51 on: January 26, 2010, 09:07:37 AM »
to me it looks like it must have been a pretty steep deflection shot.

+1