Author Topic: Macchi 202 and MGs  (Read 263 times)

saetta

  • Guest
Macchi 202 and MGs
« on: May 09, 2000, 06:06:00 AM »
I was wondering some time ago if
the C.202 is faster and more agile
in AH, without the 7,7mm wing guns,
only with 2 x 12,7mm guns.
Pyro, could you help?

thx

Offline Jochen

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 188
      • http://www.jannousiainen.net
Macchi 202 and MGs
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2000, 06:53:00 AM »
Well, if you take weight away from plane I bet it will quite propably be faster. Different thing is how much faster and how much agile. Since they are relatively light MG's, and there are not too many of them, I think it would not make big difference.

------------------
jochen

Geschwaderkommodore (on leave) Jagdgeschwader 2 'Richthofen' (Warbirds)

Jagdflieger JG 2 'Richthofen' (Aces High)

Thanks for the Fw 190A-5 HTC!

Ladysmith wants you forthwith to come to her relief
Burn your briefs you leave for France tonight
Carefully cut the straps of the booby-traps and set the captives free
But don't shoot 'til you see her big blue eyes
jochen Gefechtsverband Kowalewski

Units: I. and II./KG 51, II. and III./KG 76, NSGr 1, NSGr 2, NSGr 20.
Planes: Do 17Z, Ju 87D, Ju 88A, He 111H, Ar 234A, Me 410A, Me 262A, Fw 190A, Fw 190F, Fw 190G.

Sieg oder bolsevismus!

Offline Westy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
Macchi 202 and MGs
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2000, 07:41:00 AM »

 Different engines too between the 202 and the 205, no?

-Westy

Offline Kieren

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Macchi 202 and MGs
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2000, 08:23:00 AM »
Westy-

I think he means he wants to be able to drop the useless 7.9's, especially if it ups the speed and climb. I would agree.  

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Macchi 202 and MGs
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2000, 08:36:00 AM »

Yep, from Series VII (if I remember well) all C.202s had 2x12,7mm in the nose and 2x7,7mm added in the wings.

The interesting thing is that almost all pilots removed them. Consider that they fought against P40, Hurricanes and Spitfire MkV (Trop), not exactly paper planes.

FYI, 2x7,7mm + ammo had a total weight of about 80-85Kg.

The 1.02p3 C.202 is faster and climbs better than the 1.02 one. IMHO is still not enuff, but you know, I'm never happy with it  
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Macchi 202 and MGs
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2000, 08:37:00 AM »

Saetta, plz take a look at our private Forum, theres something to decide ...  
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

saetta

  • Guest
Macchi 202 and MGs
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2000, 08:51:00 AM »
cc, I tried it now offline
and it seems a little better without
the 7,7mm. However still too light
to shot down fighters , figure out
a b-17...!

p.s. Gatt, non so ne indirizzo ne password
     del newsgroup!

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Macchi 202 and MGs
« Reply #7 on: May 09, 2000, 09:12:00 AM »

Last time I checked there was no big difference between the light and "heavy" (LOL  ) C.202.
I understand that 80-85Kg are not so much ... perhaps the roll-rate should be a lil' better.

Saetta, check your e-mail box. Dismissed!  
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown