Author Topic: Smoke Effects Idea  (Read 937 times)

Offline blyind420

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Smoke Effects Idea
« on: February 06, 2010, 05:01:37 PM »
ok i know im not the only one who gets thier FPS destroyed by the smoke that comes off hangers, could there
please be an option to turn the smoke down to perhaps what the damaged vehicle smoke looks like, and/or make an option in the advanced tab to just turn it off.
because as it stands right now i get 60fps constantly until i fly over a destroyed field with all the smoking hangers, then it gets choppy and i get around 30 fps.
i dont have a great gfx card but i do meet the requirements...ati radeon 3650 HD 512mb card.
i think this is a good idea and i dont see how it could hurt the game play at all. :rock

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2010, 06:25:52 PM »
I use the fire and smoke from the hangars to kill lots of vulchers  with my spit8. reduce the smoke, will lower my d/k ration  :cry.  also lots of gv's like to hide in the fire/smoke to be harder to spot, not perfect but it works sometime.  I would say no, sorry about that. 

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2010, 06:32:33 PM »
Could give you a distinct advantage.

I know people who would love to have 30fps!  :noid
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline 715

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2010, 09:09:10 PM »
I think the smoke would be less of a fps killer if it were more realistic.  Currently it spreads out way too much horizontally: real fire smoke goes mostly vertical due to buoyancy.  Making thinner vertical plumes would reduce the number of "puffs" and reduce polygon count.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2010, 02:44:39 AM »
I think the smoke would be less of a fps killer if it were more realistic.  Currently it spreads out way too much horizontally: real fire smoke goes mostly vertical due to buoyancy. 
You mean if the wind isn't blowing more than 2 mph...right?

jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline 715

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2010, 01:22:33 PM »
If the wind is blowing the smoke spreads into the direction of the wind, but it still doesn't disperse radially nearly as much as the current implementation. 

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2010, 02:33:30 PM »
If the wind is blowing the smoke spreads into the direction of the wind, but it still doesn't disperse radially nearly as much as the current implementation. 
Yeah I forgot about the heat from a fire causing a vertical "funnel" of air rising until the temperature variance changes to the point where the wind takes over movement. I don't have any problems with the smoke or fog...but a combination of many moving objects, fire sprites and smoke does drop my fps if I fly too close.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline pervert

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2010, 06:07:47 PM »
I know people who would love to have 30fps!  :noid

+ 1  :lol

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10470
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2010, 08:19:12 PM »
 420,

  You realize that you can adjust the ground detail range and this should help with framerate.

 Also,I'd check to see how many processes you have running,streamlining this may help.

   :salute

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2010, 10:26:02 PM »
there's a setting to disable smoke effects. not sure what it does

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline CountD90

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2010, 02:47:27 AM »
Stop toolshedding, raise your FPS  :D


because as it stands right now i get 60fps constantly until i fly over a destroyed field with all the smoking hangers, then it gets choppy and i get around 30 fps.
GameID:Count
The Misfit Toys
Quote from: Wreked
If you are feeling a little useless, offended, or depressed, just remember that you were once the fastest and most victorious little sperm out of millions.

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: Smoke Effects Idea
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2010, 07:37:30 PM »
+1 YES YES YES!! frame rate from 58-59 to 15 flying into smoke. A small trickle of flame & smoke. is plenty, we get the idea. Not CV's though, we want to see it a LONG WAY AWAY.   :neener: :banana:
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,