« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Down

Author Topic: Allied jets.  (Read 4334 times)

Offline JHerne

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 659
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #60 on: February 24, 2010, 08:50:22 AM »
Aw come on, we all know if its posted on the Inter-web, its gotta be fact!

V2 is up there with nuke-capable B-29s, in-air repairs, windscreen cleaner, and 100LL on V-bases so you can refuel your Pony.

That's 5 minutes of my life that I'm not getting back...
Logged
Skunkworks AvA Researcher and
Primary Cause of Angst

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #61 on: February 24, 2010, 04:28:47 PM »
How do you really feel about it?
Quote from: JHerne on February 24, 2010, 08:50:22 AM

That's 5 minutes of my life that I'm not getting back...
Logged
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline 1carbine

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #62 on: February 24, 2010, 08:45:14 PM »
Quote from: Westy on February 24, 2010, 08:38:24 AM
"Got that from wikipedia"

lol. Might as well make up anythign you wish and post it if you're
going to quote wikipedia as the basis for your facts. 
yeah really again my bad. wasn't in WWII didn't fly the meteor so I just have to go on what historical sights say.
Logged
Obama is the Energizer bunny of fail.

_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline ariansworld

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 756
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #63 on: February 25, 2010, 08:36:47 PM »
Quote from: warphoenix on February 20, 2010, 09:33:58 AM
I'm not trying to destroy good dogfights, I mean it would be nice to have jet v jet combat, but it never happened in WW2, so why give a possability of it in a WW2 game like AH

We already have rocket VS jet.....
Logged

Offline 1carbine

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #64 on: February 25, 2010, 09:20:34 PM »
Sure would be nice if we had them would make the final battle more realistic. :bolt:
Logged
Obama is the Energizer bunny of fail.

_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #65 on: February 26, 2010, 04:31:50 PM »
Quote from: LLogann on February 20, 2010, 10:40:53 AM
Lord knows we all need that 38H all the SAPPER's keep telling us about.  Same ole' things.

Lighten up Francis, the P-38H thing is a joke and not a serious request at all by anyone in SAPP though we would not turn a blind eye if HiTech decided to add it.


ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline 1carbine

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #66 on: February 26, 2010, 06:55:25 PM »
There's no supply without demand if you want it let them hear it  :D +1
Logged
Obama is the Energizer bunny of fail.

_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #67 on: February 26, 2010, 07:11:52 PM »
 i am for it, the arguments against it don't apply since we have aircraft fighting against aircraft that never fought against each other for real.
 but i would not put it ahead of anything on my list as follows
YAK-3
M-18 hellcat
some other plane
 mk-II
Logged
Flying since tour 71.

Offline 1carbine

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #68 on: February 28, 2010, 12:56:32 AM »
Yes i think some planes should come before it like the SM-79 and the A-26 but i definitely think it should come before other planes.
Logged
Obama is the Energizer bunny of fail.

_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline 1carbine

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #69 on: March 03, 2010, 01:01:00 PM »
Is there a website where I can find reliable information on aircraft other than Wiki any help would be appreciated  :salute
Logged
Obama is the Energizer bunny of fail.

_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #70 on: March 03, 2010, 01:56:35 PM »
Quote from: 1carbine on March 03, 2010, 01:01:00 PM
Is there a website where I can find reliable information on aircraft other than Wiki any help would be appreciated  :salute

Books come to mind.  Anyway, you start with wiki and investigate the sources they use.  Further, google what you are looking for and compare the information.


wrongway
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline 33Vortex

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4754
      • Dirac's equation (non truncated)
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #71 on: March 03, 2010, 02:02:39 PM »
So if the brits get the MkIII, can we get the Ta152C?  :devil
Logged

GameID: Turner
Truth has no agenda.

Offline 1carbine

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #72 on: March 03, 2010, 09:08:54 PM »
Quote from: 33Vortex on March 03, 2010, 02:02:39 PM
So if the brits get the MkIII, can we get the Ta152C?  :devil

You'll probably get yours first lol
Logged
Obama is the Energizer bunny of fail.

_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #73 on: March 03, 2010, 10:00:55 PM »
Quote from: 33Vortex on March 03, 2010, 02:02:39 PM
So if the brits get the MkIII, can we get the Ta152C?  :devil
Did the Ta152C see combat and squadron level service on production airframes?
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Wingnutt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1665
Re: Allied jets.
« Reply #74 on: March 03, 2010, 11:35:03 PM »
Quote from: Westy on February 24, 2010, 08:38:24 AM
"Got that from wikipedia"

lol. Might as well make up anythign you wish and post it if you're
going to quote wikipedia as the basis for your facts. 

Generally speaking Wikipedia is pretty accurate about historical stuff, not too often does incorrect info stay one there for very long.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7   Go Up
« previous next »