Author Topic: F4F-3 HTC PUHLEEZE!!!!!!!!! (Read 563 times)

AKSWulfe · « **on:** July 17, 2001, 03:33:00 PM »

http://www.csd.uwo.ca/~pettypi/elevon/baugher_other/f4f.html

You really can't say no now HTC.

-SW

[ 07-17-2001: Message edited by: SWulfe ]

Steven · « **Reply #1 on:** July 17, 2001, 04:23:00 PM »

SWulfe,

As I said in another thread, I'd be remiss if I did not vote my desires.

Yes, please add the F4F and other early-war aircraft.

-Puke
332nd Flying Mongrels

brady · « **Reply #2 on:** July 17, 2001, 07:39:00 PM »

I respect other peoples desires for their favorate planes to be added after all, since I obviously feal the same as they do,....

BUT FOR THE LOVE OF GOD NO MORE US STUFF FOR A WHILE....

please

prety plane though...their is one at a museum near me in perfect condition a beautiful thing it is.

I think Wotan ( my squad mate) said it best though:"man I hate flying them blue planes"

[ 07-17-2001: Message edited by: brady ]

AKSWulfe · « **Reply #3 on:** July 17, 2001, 07:56:00 PM »

Look at it this way: You guys got your Fw-190D9 (you guys as in JV44)...

All I want is a measly stubby grey with yellow wings fighter that the 190D9 could fly circles around all day long.

It's not like it's really a threat anyway.

All I want <sniff> is a <sniff> stubby <sniff> little Wildkitten.. <sniff>

-SW

AKSWulfe · « **Reply #4 on:** July 17, 2001, 08:38:00 PM »

I know this has to help HTC with the F4F-3 as well...

I mean, it is from the Navy archives.
http://www.history.navy.mil/branches/hist-ac/f4f-4.pdf

1MB
-SW

brady · « **Reply #5 on:** July 17, 2001, 10:08:00 PM »

Ok ok it's good to want

AG Sach · « **Reply #6 on:** July 17, 2001, 10:10:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SWulfe:
Look at it this way: You guys got your Fw-190D9 (you guys as in JV44)...

All I want is a measly stubby grey with yellow wings fighter that the 190D9 could fly circles around all day long.

It's not like it's really a threat anyway.

All I want <sniff> is a <sniff> stubby <sniff> little Wildkitten.. <sniff>
-SW

If they gave you that they would have to unperk the Ta-152. And of course add the ME-410, on second thought add the 410 and 219 an you can have all the US "who thought up there damn nicknames anyway?" planes.

LLv34_Camouflage · « **Reply #7 on:** July 19, 2001, 08:15:00 PM »

Why F4F-3, when we could have the Brewster Model 239 Buffalo?

Camo

juzz · « **Reply #8 on:** July 23, 2001, 11:29:00 PM »

FM-2 would probably be more appropriate to the latewar planeset.

LLv34_Camouflage · « **Reply #9 on:** July 24, 2001, 05:16:00 AM »

The Brewster is better.

Camo

AKSWulfe · « **Reply #10 on:** July 24, 2001, 08:24:00 AM »

I'd still rather have an F4F-3, but I'll settle for a FM-2.... for now...
-SW

Vermillion · « **Reply #11 on:** July 27, 2001, 09:07:00 AM »

I'm with Juzz, lets get the FM-2 first

It would allow for some very nice events.

DamnedATC · « **Reply #12 on:** July 31, 2001, 03:21:00 PM »

The F4F, if modeled correctly, would not appeal to everyday play. It is not fast, does not climb well and not to agile. However, for doing events, simulating early war years, it would benefit our selection. From the early war years, I think the kate and val would be a fine addition. These aircraft would be of more use(for everyday play) than the F4F IMHO.

ATC

Seeker · « **Reply #13 on:** July 31, 2001, 05:43:00 PM »

I used to do alright in the Wildcat in AW, ATC....

Mathman · « **Reply #14 on:** August 02, 2001, 11:09:00 AM »

I would hope that we get all the planes in this photo at some point (I would even take the F3F out for a spin or two). We already have 2 of them.
http://www.geocities.com/asstpix/catflt.jpg

Nothing like the Grumman Cats!

Edit: Fargin Geocities... cut and paste the URL I guess

[ 08-02-2001: Message edited by: Mathman ]