« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6   Go Down

Author Topic: Plane performance not right?  (Read 3052 times)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #15 on: March 21, 2010, 06:58:05 PM »
They had only been "too fast" since the previous patch, though. Steve's been flying ponies for years. I think he means compared to "before the WW1 patch"
Logged

Offline WMLute

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4512
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #16 on: March 21, 2010, 07:01:43 PM »
Me and Dedalos took up some ponyDs today.

Something is diff. from pre-patch/update for sure.

I would be curious if the "fix" was to revert it back or if they changed the new modeling and it is just a tad bit "off".
(betting on the latter)
Logged
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
— George Patton

Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #17 on: March 21, 2010, 07:03:56 PM »
Who'd'a thunk a WW1 inclusion would have changed so many other things?

I'm wondering what they had to do to the overall game physics to allow the WW1 planes to be added. You'd think they wouldn't touch any of the pre-existing aircraft speeds, damage models, trim tables, but it seems all of that and maybe more was affected by adding 4 bi/triplane.

Makes me curious what went on behind HTC's doors!
Logged

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #18 on: March 21, 2010, 07:17:05 PM »
Quote from: kamori on March 20, 2010, 12:52:16 PM
Its your sound card...post DxDiag and install newest drivers..if thats no it then call your ISP  its your connection...If thats not it its your powersupply...Are you running AMD?
 :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:

Kam

did you mean this amd?



see sigs.

Logged

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #19 on: March 21, 2010, 08:06:12 PM »
I havent noticed any difference with any of the planes I've flown till last night. When I was consistently cutting planes in half or making them go BOOM and only getting assists.

Had ta check to make sure I wasnt in a 109F LOL
Logged
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline grizz441

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7001
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #20 on: March 21, 2010, 08:11:35 PM »
I think the dive accelerations are off.
Logged

Offline Mar

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2204
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #21 on: March 21, 2010, 08:26:48 PM »
Think maybe HT should get back into his RV-8 for a little while? :joystick:
Logged
𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓈𝒽𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓌𝓈 𝑜𝒻 𝓌𝒶𝓇'𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓃 𝑜𝒻 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒶𝒾𝓇 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒

  "Onward to the land of kings—via the sky of aces!"
  Oh, and zack1234 rules. :old:

Offline Ruler2

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #22 on: March 21, 2010, 08:59:02 PM »
Quote from: skribetm on March 21, 2010, 07:17:05 PM
did you mean this amd?

(Image removed from quote.)

see sigs.



5.2 GHZ!!!!!!!  :x :x :x
Logged

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2010, 11:57:38 PM »
^ It won't download porn any quicker, but you should see the Space Invaders!
Logged
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #24 on: March 22, 2010, 12:10:53 AM »
Quote from: infowars on March 20, 2010, 06:04:55 PM
Yeah there's weird stuff going on.  The other night I watched Grizz TnB with multiple cons and win decisively.  I knew there was something fishy....  :noid
uhh....the pony can TnB quite nicely for a heavy ZnB AC
Logged
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #25 on: March 22, 2010, 01:24:36 AM »
The pony is not overly nimble, but the point is he was making a funny. He was getting in a dig at a pal.
Logged

Offline groundfeeder

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 324
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #26 on: March 22, 2010, 07:57:08 AM »
I think they still run away as fast as always :joystick:
Logged

Offline Sunka

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1774
      • http://www.327th.com/
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #27 on: March 22, 2010, 08:21:18 AM »
Quote from: groundfeeder on March 22, 2010, 07:57:08 AM
I think they still run away as fast as always :joystick:
Logged
Someday the mountain might getem but the law nvr will. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SP5EkvOGMCs

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #28 on: March 22, 2010, 08:41:36 AM »
Quote from: While it should have read...15392

Version 2.18 Patch 2
======================

Fixed an issue that caused WW2 planes to fly too fast... except the Fw-190A-5, which was too slow to begin with.  Thanks for pointing that out, guys.
Logged

Offline Warchief

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 210
      • http://
Re: Plane performance not right?
« Reply #29 on: March 22, 2010, 09:12:31 AM »
The heard various complaints mine is that the guns dont work as well. I have flown many aircraft and some days I am able to do same damage as before and others day no luck. Before says it is your connection. One night I fought a Spit 16 with a Hurr IIC took 3/4 of my ammo to kill him and switch to his friend a Spit 8 and unloaded with 80% of the rounds fired hitting there target no damage to him. The same night I up a Spit 8 and hit the guy ripping him in half with just the .303 of course a few seconds later his buddy decided to his my Spit 8 in his recreation of Swiss CHeese
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6   Go Up
« previous next »