Author Topic: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model  (Read 2627 times)

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« on: April 03, 2010, 11:11:53 PM »
Please check into the damage model on the Wirbelwind.  I have twice been killed by planes that are only equipped with .50 cals in strafing runs.  This should not be possible.  Thank you in advance HTC.
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2010, 11:33:43 PM »
Way, were you damaged prior to the 50's hitting you ? pretty thin, I know
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2010, 11:36:26 PM »
Weren't there tests done that showed the Browning M2 COULD actually penetrate steel plate armor?

However I've NEVER seen .50cal kill a Wirble or Ostwind. They can certainly knock out the turret (open top + several hundred flying bits of metal = hamburger) and I've occasionally seen hits to the right area kill an M8, but never anything more heavily armored than that.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2010, 11:41:57 PM »
Sax, I've seen  50cal take the turret out but flat killing it..not sure on that....SNAILMAN, where are you  ?
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2010, 11:42:23 PM »
Way, were you damaged prior to the 50's hitting you ? pretty thin, I know

Negative.  I have driven the WW enough since it's inception to know something has changed.  In fact, both kills were from P40E's no bombs.
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Ruler2

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 923
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2010, 11:45:38 PM »
Please check into the damage model on the Wirbelwind.  I have twice been killed by planes that are only equipped with .50 cals in strafing runs.  This should not be possible.  Thank you in advance HTC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uytYDVfnyGc   Maybe he got a good rear burst on you.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2010, 11:47:50 PM »
SNAILMAN, where are you  ?

I'm here, but I don't know what I am required for in this thread ;)

But I have a suggestion: We (and probably HTC too) need .ahf films showing this.

So my advice would be: Take a friend, go to MW and try to recreate this incident. Select a remote location, spawn a wirble to enemy base where the friend is waiting in a P-40 or similar plane. Then test a few times it with recorder running.

When there still was a LAN option, I used to do such tests by myself, but that ain't possible anymore :(
« Last Edit: April 03, 2010, 11:49:41 PM by Lusche »
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline TonyJoey

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1953
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2010, 11:51:52 PM »
Blew up a flak today with a few passes in a Hellcat. I like being able to kill them with .50's :devil

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2010, 12:32:24 AM »
I must have +50 kills on WW just by taking out their turret with my .50 cal p-47.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2010, 01:20:14 AM »
I am not talking about bailing from it when I have lost my turret.  I will take Lusches advice and try to recreate & film.
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2010, 05:59:38 AM »
Seeing that its an OPEN turret. Don't you think .50 coming in at a steep angle would get inside the hull and puree the occupants?
See Rule #4

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23888
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2010, 06:45:28 AM »
Seeing that its an OPEN turret. Don't you think .50 coming in at a steep angle would get inside the hull and puree the occupants?


I do. But then, it never worked that way in AH, and I don't remember any mentioning of changes in the GV damage model in the release notes.
So so there are some questions open on that matter. ;)

First step: Find out if something is really different.
Second step, if yes, find out why :)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2010, 09:32:42 AM »
I do. But then, it never worked that way in AH, and I don't remember any mentioning of changes in the GV damage model in the release notes.
So so there are some questions open on that matter. ;)

First step: Find out if something is really different.
Second step, if yes, find out why :)
Well if it's now the case... then it has been fixed IMO. :aok
See Rule #4

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2010, 09:39:11 AM »
Well if it's now the case... then it has been fixed IMO. :aok

Now if only they'd do something about the lack of recoil and unrealistic volume or rate of fire....
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: 50 cal vs. Wirbelwind Damage Model
« Reply #14 on: April 04, 2010, 09:41:55 AM »
Now if only they'd do something about the lack of recoil and unrealistic volume or rate of fire....
Remember when recoil was 1st added? The whine was incredible.
See Rule #4