IN designator

[Boxboy]

I think we should have just a few guys be appointed as the "IN" designators, that way skuzzy can just review their posts and lock all those threads that these guys dislike

[cobia38]

 qualifications should be as follows
  1:  no less then 2 years of ankle humping experiance
  2:  able to hump multible ankles at one time
  3:  able to hump said ankles without drawing to much attention

[infowars]

oh oh oh...  Im IN

[JimmyC]

This is an INfomercial.....

[IrishOne]

how could I have got myself INvolved in a thread like this.....

[BaldEagl]

Nothing to see here, move along

[LLogann]

Why don't you just go ask them to be a non-paid intern Box?


Same thing.

[Mar]

Did you forget about the "Report to moderator" button?

[kingcobradude]

what do you mean by in?

[Bronk]

what do you mean by in?

"IN"  In the thread before it is locked.

[minke]

INdeed

[Masherbrum]

IN!

[captain1ma]

qualifications should be as follows
  1:  no less then 2 years of ankle humping experiance
  2:  able to hump multible ankles at one time
  3:  able to hump said ankles without drawing to much attention

you forgot bad spellINg 2

[TinmanX]

Wouldn't that go against Rule #5? Have I just broken Rule #5 by asking if the OP's idea would violate Rule #5? Shoot, I just broke Rule #5! Arrrgh, I broke it again by pointing out that I broke it! I'm stuck in a Rule #5 Paradox!

[LLogann]

YES.......   

See rule #5