It would have to be perked.
I was thinking of the same.
Why would it need to be perked? ack-ack
Because i said so.
Seriously? The D-11 has an advantage to the D-25 in all categories of manuevering: climb, speed, turn, and roll is basically the same. The only thing the D-25 has is better visibility. There is no warrant for it to be perked. Even with the ord capability.
I love jugs!!!! but i am in agreement, we need other stuff now!M-18 yak-3Well those two and then a new jug!! lol
An extra pair of jugs would be great. But if you can get me a recliner, Slim Jim and a beer to go along with them life would be complete.
I think a P-47D-22-RE or D-23-RA with malcolm hood is better.Malcolm hood P-47http://www.ww2incolor.com/us-air-force/p-47+5th+eme.htmlhttp://img641.imageshack.us/i/3p47scaleaviationmodell.jpg/http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/4599/p47d23.jpghttp://img225.imageshack.us/i/p47d15.jpg/http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/4575/german1945.jpghttp://img163.imageshack.us/img163/9582/forcelanding.jpghttp://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1451/yankeeclipper.jpghttp://img341.imageshack.us/img341/8131/snowforcelanding.jpghttp://aeroscale.kitmaker.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=SquawkBox&file=index&req=viewtopic&topic_id=106545&page=10http://p47.kitmaker.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=SquawkBox&file=index&req=viewtopic&topic_id=144622&page=1B-24 bubble modification:http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/4885/p47d21.jpghttp://img685.imageshack.us/img685/9018/b24mod.jpghttp://photos.kitmaker.net/data/20616/cowling3.jpgP47D-22&D-23The D-22-RE saw the two factories begin to use different propellers. At Farmingdale the D-22 used a Hamilton Standard Hydramatic 244E50-65 propeller, which had wider, longer propeller blades than the Curtis Electric propeller used on earlier aircraft. The new propeller improved the performance of the aircraft by making better use of the high level of power provided by the engine. The D-23 saw Evansville also change propellers, but to the Curtis Electric C542S propeller. This was similar is size and concept to the Hamilton model used on the D-22.http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_P-47D.html--------- The 3.71 meter (12 foot 2 inch) Curtiss propeller was replaced by new and bigger propellers, the Long Island plant moving to a Hamilton Standard propeller with a diameter of 4.01 meters (13 feet 1-7/8 inches), and the Evansville plant moving to a new Curtiss propeller with a diameter of 3.96 meters (13 feet). The new propeller further boosted the climb rate, and Luftwaffe pilots now found they couldn't get away from the P-47 by climbing. http://www.vectorsite.net/avp47.html#m5---------Many of the Fighter Groups flying the P-47 in June of '44 were still flying some of the older "razor back" models with the framed canopy. These included the ultimate "razor back", the P-47D-23-RA. This Evansville built fighter was equipped with the latest Curtiss Electric paddle blade propeller. Of all the D models, this one was the fastest and best climbing.http://www.cradleofaviation.org/history/aircraft/p-47/7.htmlP-47 propellershttp://www.hfmodeling.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=SquawkBox&file=index&req=viewtopic&topic_id=128328&page=1
So, lets trash the D-25 and give us the D-30
They are basically the same plane. Being a PTO Jug fanboi myself, I'd love to see a P-47D-23 ingame. But, it will be a long time coming, if ever. And, without a Malcolm hood.
Here is a question that i was thinking about. why do we have the D-11, 25 and 40 when there where a wide range of the "D" class? What about the "G" class? how do they stand up to the "D" class?
P47G models were only D identicals but built by Curtis iirc