Author Topic: Razorback P-47D 23  (Read 4418 times)

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #45 on: September 11, 2010, 06:48:35 PM »
I would not mind too.  Then they can have the D23 in the Mid War Arena. 
+1   :D
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #46 on: September 12, 2010, 12:38:14 AM »
I would not mind too.  Then they can have the D23 in the Mid War Arena. 

D-23 was a mid-to-late 1944 bird, and therefore wouldn't fit into the mid-war time line.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #47 on: September 12, 2010, 08:50:51 AM »
D-23 was a mid-to-late 1944 bird, and therefore wouldn't fit into the mid-war time line.
BUZZ Killer! :furious
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Seadog36

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 666
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #48 on: September 12, 2010, 02:34:28 PM »
Stoney you are such a difficult Jughead, nothing gets by you :old: :aok. How about another Kearby ride; D-15? First model factory with wing pylons, can't find the exact deployment dates, but that should squeak into the MW time line, not that it won't fall on deaf ears! anyway

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #49 on: September 12, 2010, 04:59:40 PM »
Stoney you are such a difficult Jughead, nothing gets by you :old: :aok. How about another Kearby ride; D-15? First model factory with wing pylons, can't find the exact deployment dates, but that should squeak into the MW time line, not that it won't fall on deaf ears! anyway

Well, I think the D-23 is the model they should add, as the 22/23 series was the second most prolific model after the 25/30 series.  That doesn't help us out in the MW arena though.  Honestly, the P-47's first combat in ETO was spring of '43 (C models) and fall '43 in PTO.  It was pretty much a late arrival into the war really.  The last of the major U.S. fighters in fact.  So, the D-11 would really be the only model that would fit the MW arena criteria. 

On the other hand, the F6F-5 is in the MW arena, and it shouldn't be.  The F6F-3 would be the proper Hellcat for the MW arena.  I'm not sure how that got added, so perhaps there's a chance a late-war razorback could be included.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline CPW

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 52
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #50 on: September 13, 2010, 07:25:56 AM »
Horsepower rating was different: D-25 rated at 2200hp vs. 2600hp for the D-40.  The D-30, is identical to the D-25, except for the dorsal fin.  That's it.  That's why I thought it was goofy that we had D-30 skins on the D-40, but meh...

I wish we had a D-23, but the D-25 was the most numerous model made, and thus, in my opinion, worthy of being represented in-game.  Realistically, the D-40 really came along pretty late in the ball-game, only beating the M by a few months.

By my links, I think most pre D-25/26s rated at 2300hp, then raised to 2430 from D-27, finally got 2600hp in late period. But it may retrofitted to earlier model, therefore a 2300/2430/2600hp boosted D-22/23 could be the fastest of D series (match the red line in my last reply).

Besides, the most numerous model was D-30 actually, about 2,600 built.
« Last Edit: September 13, 2010, 07:33:59 AM by CPW »

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #51 on: September 13, 2010, 08:50:23 AM »
By my links, I think most pre D-25/26s rated at 2300hp, then raised to 2430 from D-27, finally got 2600hp in late period. But it may retrofitted to earlier model, therefore a 2300/2430/2600hp boosted D-22/23 could be the fastest of D series (match the red line in my last reply).

Besides, the most numerous model was D-30 actually, about 2,600 built.

You're right about the 2300 for the D-25.  I should have looked that one up first.  Dean in America's Hundred Thousand lists the D-25/28 with the most production copies, followed by the D-30, then the D-21/23.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Seadog36

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 666
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #52 on: September 13, 2010, 04:34:07 PM »
Enough of the semantics, how do we forward the agenda Stoney. Who should hear this squeaky wheel? How does this wishlist go down the chain of command? I've emailed skuzzy and he says he has nothing to do with it. :lol

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Razorback P-47D 23
« Reply #53 on: September 13, 2010, 05:03:37 PM »
Enough of the semantics, how do we forward the agenda Stoney. Who should hear this squeaky wheel? How does this wishlist go down the chain of command? I've emailed skuzzy and he says he has nothing to do with it. :lol

Don't know buddy...We made a case for the P-47M saying that it would be an easy addition, at least from a modeling standpoint, as the D-25 or D-40 model would work for the M.  I suppose the same argument could be made for the D-23 with respect to the existing D-11 model, although since it has drop tanks and bigger fuel tanks in addition to the power changes, it may be a tougher thing to do.

The D-23 would open up a lot of capability for special events as well.  But, there's a large portion of the player base who feel like there are enough/too many Jug models already, so be prepared for some push-back.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech