Author Topic: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????  (Read 10959 times)

Offline GearJrk

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #285 on: May 07, 2010, 07:16:20 PM »
I've been in the MA when Mjsmoke up there WAS controling 5 CV's, and kepping them stashed in the corner, by jumping from CV to CV to keep the corrald.

You guys keep saying your squad doesnt do it, yet again and again i've you guys doing the same thing on the large maps.
Stop saying it ain't so..., because I know damn well that it is.

Really? Every time you log in?  :huh :headscratch:
Gear
Claim Jumpers

Offline COndor06

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 380
      • http://www.CondorAerial.com
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #286 on: May 07, 2010, 07:37:44 PM »
My response to CJs having control of the CVs is this:  You are asserting that a CJ has control of each CV for 24/7.  That is simply not true.  The current system allows each player the right to control a CV based upon rank.  We do not and never will have "exclusive control" or dictate who gets to run the

First off I would like to say Thank you Gear. Thanks for taking your time to respond in civil and thought out manor.  :salute

This didn't need to be a 20 page forum if more CJs had the class or maturity to respond respectfully as you took the time too.

I do disgree with the above quote. This is the point. As you stated, the system allows each player the right to control (A) CV based upon rank. This was not the case. IT was 24/7 and CJs were turning EVERY EFFORT made by any Rook to use ANY CV the CJs took into their control. And it's not a one time deal either. THis happens a lot.

Hence the multitudes of responses to this thread.
« Last Edit: May 07, 2010, 07:41:18 PM by COndor06 »
Be careful what you shoot at. Most things
in here don't react too well to bullets.
Captain Marko Ramius:

http://www.CondorAerial.com

Offline COndor06

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 380
      • http://www.CondorAerial.com
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #287 on: May 07, 2010, 07:45:07 PM »
Geez...STOP YOUR CRYING..Sounding like little girls in here..Its an effective tactic in the game..DEAL WITH IT....

KAM

Wow, Really got us in your pocket with that one.
Be careful what you shoot at. Most things
in here don't react too well to bullets.
Captain Marko Ramius:

http://www.CondorAerial.com

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #288 on: May 07, 2010, 08:40:37 PM »
I logged on the other night and saw all those CV's stashed. Not the first time I have seen this either. It really is a pointless thing to do, even drawing a picture of your willy with its course has more point.
(Image removed from quote.)

Wow. That's a really cool idea. I can't wait to draw a pic of my schlong with a carrier course.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #289 on: May 08, 2010, 08:58:32 AM »

The following are responses to your numbered list:

1. We're talking about one event.  I wasn't there but as a general rule I don't condone the taking of CVs and stashing them.


Gear

This is NOT a "one-time occurrence".    This has been prevalent for well over a year.   This has LONG been a "CJ Party Line".   
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline GearJrk

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #290 on: May 08, 2010, 01:57:21 PM »
This is NOT a "one-time occurrence".    This has been prevalent for well over a year.   This has LONG been a "CJ Party Line".   

Actually it's not "CJ Party Line," and I ask you to prove your "well over a year" statement. 

Thanks.

 :salute

Gear
Gear
Claim Jumpers

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #291 on: May 08, 2010, 04:50:48 PM »
Actually it's not "CJ Party Line," and I ask you to prove your "well over a year" statement.  

Thanks.

 :salute

Gear

No "proof" needed.   This has been an on going issue with your ADHD Squadron who thinks "their Elite tactics" are superior to everyone elses.  

Shove the Salute for someone else, patronization is the sign of a shallow person.  

You're Welcome.
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline WMLute

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4512
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #292 on: May 08, 2010, 04:59:40 PM »
your ADHD Squadron who thinks "their Elite tactics" are superior to everyone elses.  

Attacking undefended bases or with 4 to 1 advantage if defended isn't "elite".
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
— George Patton

Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit

Offline RufusLeaking

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1056
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #293 on: May 08, 2010, 05:00:20 PM »
A desperation to feel a part of something, anything, and the belief that being a cartoon horde makes you somebody?
Good explanation.  Consortiums, societies, and squads less than 32 make you even more of a somebody.

Seriously, the obsession with size is really over done.
GameID: RufLeak
Claim Jumpers

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #294 on: May 08, 2010, 05:03:33 PM »
Good explanation.  Consortiums, societies, and squads less than 32 make you even more of a somebody.

Seriously, the obsession with size is really over done.

Actually, it does.   Because you know EVERYONE within.   Don't even try to tell us you know all 146 members' real names. 
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline RufusLeaking

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1056
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #295 on: May 08, 2010, 05:05:29 PM »
Attacking undefended bases or with 4 to 1 advantage if defended isn't "elite".
Attacking an undefended base would mean dividing by zero ... 
GameID: RufLeak
Claim Jumpers

Offline whipster22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 458
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #296 on: May 08, 2010, 05:14:38 PM »
solution people have go the a trainer get certified to pilot a CV and CVs don't count to score. :eek:
just dewbing up the bbs
baby seal

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #297 on: May 08, 2010, 05:20:27 PM »
solution people have go the a trainer get certified to pilot a CV and CVs don't count to score. :eek:
A CV license  :banana:
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #298 on: May 08, 2010, 06:07:28 PM »
Good explanation.  Consortiums, societies, and squads less than 32 make you even more of a somebody.

Seriously, the obsession with size is really over done.

LOL you prove the point.  Why so obsessed with size?

Since the game limits squad size to 32 or less, why not live within those limits?  You can't tell me those are 146 of your closest friends can you?
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline crazyivan

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3920
Re: Taking Carriers Out Of The Game??????
« Reply #299 on: May 08, 2010, 08:19:51 PM »
.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2010, 08:26:30 PM by crazyivan »
POTW
"Atleast I have chicken!"- Leroy Jenkins