Author Topic: Swordfish  (Read 2993 times)

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #60 on: May 11, 2010, 06:51:38 PM »
My desire to fly a Swordfish in AH is still overwhelming, so - time for another BUMP.

 :cool:
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline whipster22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 458
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #61 on: May 11, 2010, 07:07:54 PM »
mocking clap  :old:

swordfish would be cool
« Last Edit: May 11, 2010, 07:12:31 PM by whipster22 »
just dewbing up the bbs
baby seal

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #62 on: May 11, 2010, 07:17:27 PM »
Because THEY SUCK! lol :rofl

Only pilots suck, airplanes just fly....

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #63 on: May 11, 2010, 09:51:25 PM »
I have posted biplanes that AH should bring in.  IMP, i think they can do it after having WWI AC.

Japan D1A "SUSIE" dive bomber
British Swordfish Mk II
British Fairey Albacore
Italian CR.42 (Served in Belgium AF and was in the Battle of Britain)
British Gladiator Mk I (Served in Finland AF on Axis side, Norway AF, and Portugla AF)
Germany Hs 123A-1 dive bomber
Russian Polikarpov I-15/I-153
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #64 on: May 12, 2010, 10:33:47 AM »
I detect a serious need arising from a very small number of toon pile-it dweebs who have a strong desire for something to make them whine endlessly about the lack of performance in their new "cool plane"...just to have what will inevitably become a hangar queen faster than it took for the WWI "cool factor" to wear off.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #65 on: May 12, 2010, 04:20:40 PM »
Me thinks you miss the point entirely...

While the "subset" that has a fascination with "less then stellar" aircraft is certainly somewhat small its far from being "pile-it dweebs".  For some of us a lot of fun involves figuring out how to be competitive in an airframe viewed as substandard by most of the player base.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2010, 04:24:51 PM by humble »

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: Swordfish
« Reply #66 on: May 12, 2010, 05:46:50 PM »
My desire to fly a Swordfish in AH is still overwhelming, so - time for another BUMP.

 :cool:


You bump the thread, i bump my reply

Wasn't important in any carrier attacks. important in the sinking of Bismark, and in blowing the French out of the water, but in AH a 130mph biplane attacking the ridiculous very late war type ack over carriers would be suicidal
 
 
To add, in your defence, and in retaliation at ridiculous fleet ack, when the stringbag first attacked the Bismark, 52 AA guns fired on 16 stringbags with 0 kills
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright