Author Topic: 262A-1 vs.262A-2  (Read 2212 times)

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
262A-1 vs.262A-2
« on: May 15, 2010, 11:43:39 PM »
Can someone give me any specs on A-1 vs. A-2 they are both almost the same but i believe that A-2 was faster and carried 12-55mm PB1 rockets.

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2010, 11:45:31 PM »
so you want an even higher perk rated 262? :headscratch:
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2010, 11:54:29 PM »
No..just asking for a comparison if i wanted a higher perked 262 this would be in the wishlist.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2010, 11:57:46 PM »
Why would it be faster?  Germany only had one jet engine in service.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2010, 11:58:51 PM »
Im not sure just thought of it being a higher horse engine.But the rockets i know were mounted on it.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2010, 12:00:40 AM »
Jets are not referred to in horsepower, but rather in lbs of thrust (or kgs of thrust).  Rocket hard points would make it draggier, thus slower.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Eagleclaw

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 298
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2010, 12:04:58 AM »
Draggier, a new word, add it, Websters!  :lol
The day no hoes would fly......

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2010, 12:07:17 AM »
Yes but that is the pilots choice if he wants them let him have them.

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2010, 01:11:13 AM »
Can someone give me any specs on A-1 vs. A-2 they are both almost the same but i believe that A-2 was faster and carried 12-55mm PB1 rockets.
Do you know how to do internet searches?

Anyways, the A-1 was a fighter while the A-2 was a fighter-bomber and only had 2 cannons.

Maximum speed:
    Me 262A-1a: 540mph (870km/h)
    Me 262A-2a: 470 mph (755km/h)

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #9 on: May 16, 2010, 01:46:05 AM »
AFAIK they made a few 262's with more "sweep" to the wings, thus increasing the compression speed. As to how many actually saw combat...?
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2010, 01:52:06 AM »
AFAIK they made a few 262's with more "sweep" to the wings, thus increasing the compression speed. As to how many actually saw combat...?
Never heard anything about that.  They were hard pressed as it was, I am skeptical that they would tinker with the production of something they needed so desperately.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2010, 03:19:46 AM »
AFAIK they made a few 262's with more "sweep" to the wings, thus increasing the compression speed. As to how many actually saw combat...?

I flew something like that once in Flightgear before, I'll try and dig it up.

EDIT: It was the Me-262 HG I, II, and III.  From what I've just read, only the HG I was ever built, and the HG III had a projected top speed of Mach 0.96.  Cite notes 31 and 32 of this Wikipedia article apparently talk about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Me_262

Also: http://up-ship.com/drawndoc/rd/rd.htm
« Last Edit: May 16, 2010, 03:34:43 AM by Yossarian »
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #12 on: May 16, 2010, 04:38:36 AM »
Draggier, a new word, add it, Websters!  :lol

Draggier, a co-efficient of draggage :confused:
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline Eagleclaw

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 298
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2010, 07:35:32 AM »
Draggier, a co-efficient of draggage :confused:

Well I'll be, Inflected form of Draggy, haha.
The day no hoes would fly......

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: 262A-1 vs.262A-2
« Reply #14 on: May 16, 2010, 08:11:32 AM »
Draggier, a co-efficient of draggage :confused:
Well I'll be, Inflected form of Draggy, haha.
:huh :O :uhoh :bolt:

 :rofl :rofl :rofl
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy