Then why are you arguing with me? The proposed setup for next week is exclusionary. There are fighters that can't really be effective in ground attack and there are ground vehicles.
That setup both ignores the history in the ETO and excludes anyone who may desire to drop some bombs on a GV driven by a human or other ground target.
I'm trying to get you to look at it with something besides your ego. If you want to get really historical, the North Africa campaign was one of the very few times level bombers were used against large forces of armor with B-25s and Bostons, but then with all your research you probably knew that. In Western Europe fighter/bombers were used to attack tanks, level bombing was reserved for high altitude operations against strategic targets...and you probably already knew that. On the Eastern front, dive bombing was used since neither side had the equipment needed for the accuracy of level bombing tanks. I fly fighters almost exclusively...most only carry 1 bomb and there are plenty of things you can knock out with a single bomb, including a tank...with the icon settings in the AvA, it's just harder to do.
Looks to me like this is a setup aimed at a very specific group instead of one trying to appeal to a wider audience.
The Leaning into France setup that ran didn't appeal to a "wider audience". The Midway setup didn't appeal to a "wider audience". The Okinawa setup didn't appeal to "a wider audience". It happens all the time...some of us are trying to rectify that in different ways and there are disagreements as to what can or should be done.
