fix the loadout shell numbers.

[Nemisis]

I've noticed that there is a discrepancy between what the loadout says, and the actuall number (and possibly ratio) of shells carried. The T-34/76 says it has 25 HVAP rounds, 50 HE rounds, and 50 AP rounds, when the actuall number of HE rounds carried is 25.

The problem also exists with the M4A3's, although I'm unsure of the load out, and numbers of shells listed as being carried.

[AWwrgwy]

Bug?

Like the 1 Calliope rocket on the new M4whateveritis?


wrongway

[LLogann]

It is a bug I've noticed also.....

[oakranger]

Just get some bug spray and kill all the bugs. That will fix it.

[Nemisis]

No WrongWay. What I mean is it says, for example, 62AP and 35HE, when in fact you only have 52 AP rounds on board your tank.

This isn't a major issue, but it seems fairly simple to fix, and it screwed me over the first time I used one of the incorectly labled loadouts (it was planing on camping a field. Took out VH and ack, only to discover that I didn't have enough HE rounds for the ordinance).

[gyrene81]

Sounds like it stopped you just short of being a complete dweeb... 

[Nemisis]

Personally i have no issues with camping the NE/SW runway of a large airfield to distract uppers. There are 4 other runways and a hanger spawn to use. I was delaying for my buddies to take out the town, wich they did, but I died before we got troops to the map room.

[gyrene81]

I thought you were talking about an undefended base. 

[Ack-Ack]

Personally i have no issues with camping the NE/SW runway of a large airfield to distract uppers. There are 4 other runways and a hanger spawn to use. I was delaying for my buddies to take out the town, wich they did, but I died before we got troops to the map room.

Didn't you post an extremely whiny thread about the evils of spawn camping?  Ever hear of the word "hypocrite"?

ack-ack

[Nemisis]

yes I did, but I didn't camp the VH or any spawn. I would have hightailed it out of there had the VH stopped smoking, because I would have been required by my conscience to slug it out face to face, and the M4A3(75) isn't much of a heavy hitter.

As I said, my purpose in attacking the base was to keep attention on me so the town could be destroyed, and troops brought to the map room. And as I said, I was offering them a fair chance to kill me with guns, seeing as there were 4 operable runways.

And Ack-Ack, I have been meaning to ask you: are you the AkAk that has been suiciding into osti's guns for the purpose of turreting them? Or is it some knock-off?

[Ack-Ack]

yes I did, but I didn't camp the VH or any spawn. I would have hightailed it out of there had the VH stopped smoking, because I would have been required by my conscience to slug it out face to face, and the M4A3(75) isn't much of a heavy hitter.

As I said, my purpose in attacking the base was to keep attention on me so the town could be destroyed, and troops brought to the map room. And as I said, I was offering them a fair chance to kill me with guns, seeing as there were 4 operable runways.

And Ack-Ack, I have been meaning to ask you: are you the AkAk that has been suiciding into osti's guns for the purpose of turreting them? Or is it some knock-off?

Basically, you're just a hypocrite.  It's okay for you to spawn camp if it serves your purpose but you cry like a tool when it's done to you.  What makes it even sadder is all the excuses you try to dredge up to explain your lameness and hypocrisy.  Think I'm gonna call you kettle from now on.

Do you have a problem with me upping a B-25H and going after GVs?  You must because you kept spamming with me with PMs in the MA until I finally told you to knock it off.  


ack-ack

[Nemisis]

Ack Ack, I have no problems with a GV camping an airfield since its hard as hell to do. What I have a problem with are those that camp a spawn because they want to build up some perks, or those that camp in an M8 so they can land their kills and look good. And Ack-Ack, a field can't really be called "camped" if I allow them to up. If you consider camping being anywhere you could possibly kill uppers, then ever damn person on or over an enemy field is camping or vulching.

I have no problem with B-25's and IL2's as they actually went after tanks. I'm fine with your 38, and I'm fine with the hoard of A20's I have a problem with people upping lancasters and carpet bombing, or dive bombing the spawns.

And all I asked was if you were Ack-Ack, or if you were someone else. BTW, you never did answer that, in the MA, nor here on the boards.

But you seem far more intent on attempting to pick my ideas of what is acceptable than of fixing a real problem in the game, so if you wish to continue hashing things out, please do it in a PM. As for now, I'm returning to the subject of the OP:

Does anyone have the exact numbers of what is listed in the loadout and what is actually carried?

[Bronk]

Spin.... spin.... spin

You are going to make yourself dizzy.

[Nemisis]

Personaly, I see a rather big difference between rolling onto a field to kill all uppers, and doing it to distract uppers. In fact, I only killed the il2's, b-25's and the planes I saw were carrying ord. Past that i let them be. I honestly don't get what's so hard to understand that there is a HUGE difference between killing all uppers, and killing those that up with the main goal of killing you and your M3.

But seeing as all you want to do is flame me and spam the boards with anti-Nemisis sentiment, I ask you to start your own "nemisis is a hipocrite because doesn't like spawn campers, yet he has no moral problems with distracting uppers, yet letting the vast majority live" thread. I said "camp a field" because it was the best discription I could think of.

[JunkyII]

Didn't you post an extremely whiny thread about the evils of spawn camping?  Ever hear of the word "hypocrite"?

ack-ack

Dont even talk about hypocrites.........