Author Topic: Spitty Mk XVI E  (Read 1049 times)

Offline GUNS06

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Spitty Mk XVI E
« on: May 24, 2010, 06:03:14 PM »
why not a Mk XVI E bubbletop?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2010, 08:24:20 PM »
It was VERY late to the game.  The vast majority of Spitfire XVIs (or XIVs) that fought were high back Spitfires.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2010, 07:00:28 AM »
why not a Mk XVI E bubbletop?
So your not satisfied with the amount of spits we have now :)
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2010, 08:07:15 AM »
So your not satisfied with the amount of spits we have now :)

What you are saying is an impossibility.  It is impossible to ever have enough Spits, until we get each and every variant.  :aok
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2010, 09:20:58 AM »
What you are saying is an impossibility.  It is impossible to ever have enough Spits, until we get each and every variant.  :aok

...and enough R4Ms to shoot down every one...
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2010, 09:27:37 AM »
What you are saying is an impossibility.  It is impossible to ever have enough Spits, until we get each and every variant.  :aok
You can have every Spit version after the P-80 is put in the game.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline whipster22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 458
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2010, 01:44:37 PM »
Ki-102 before P-80 the Ki-102 at least saw service in wwii but i would be happy with the Ki-45 :angel:
just dewbing up the bbs
baby seal

Offline Tinribs

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2010, 02:16:31 PM »
the HA and LA variants would be nice
I carnt relax cos I havent done a thing and I carnt do a thing cos I carnt relax.

Offline Kev367th

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5290
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2010, 04:12:28 PM »
It was VERY late to the game.  The vast majority of Spitfire XVIs (or XIVs) that fought were high back Spitfires.

True, but it would have been nice to have a low back XIV (not XVI) instead of the high back, just for something different.

GUNS06 - no such animal as a XVI E - They were all 'e' wing so were just known as XVI's.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
Asus M3N-HT mobo
2 x 2Gb Corsair 1066 DDR2 memory

Offline Infidelz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 449
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2010, 05:33:32 PM »
I was curious about the number of spits produced with bubble canopies. All I could find easily was 'many' with bubble canopies were produced. I also found they produced 1054 XVI's. It appears that the Mk XVIe had the bubble canopy. See TD 248 photo @ DUXFORD:
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Supermarine_Spitfire_(late_Merlin_powered_variants)?t=3.#4.



'The Mk XVI was the same as the Mk IX in nearly all respects except for the engine, a Merlin 266. The Merlin 266 was the Merlin 66 and was built under licence in the USA by the Packard Motor Company. The "2" was added as a suffix in order to avoid confusion with the engines, as they required different tooling. All Mk XVI aircraft produced were of the Low-Altitude Fighter (LF) variety. This was not determined by the length of the wings (clipped wings were fitted to most LF Spitifres), but by the engine, which had been optimised for low-altitude operation. All production Mk XVIs had clipped wings for low altitude work and were fitted with the rear fuselage fuel tanks with a combined capacity of 75 gal [32] . Many XVIs featured cut-down rear fuselages with "bubble" canopies. On these aircraft the rear fuselage tank capacity was limited to 66 gal [32] .'

If you wanted to you could count the number of XVIe'S that were built. http://www.spitfires.ukf.net/p110.htm I would guess that the war ended when Japan surrendered? So anything before than would have been built before the end of the war. ( the initial announcement of Japan's surrender was made in the afternoon of August 15, 1945 in Japan). My assumption is XVIe means with bubble canopy.

Not sure the criteria used in selecting aircraft. We have Sea Fire Mk II while the superior Mk III was produced in higher numbers.

I just thing the bubble canopy would be cool looking.

Infidelz



Offline Kev367th

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5290
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #10 on: May 25, 2010, 06:03:31 PM »
a,b,c,e only referred to wing types and had nothing to do with low/high backs.

Same confusion arises over the often misquoted IXC.
IX's were originally all c winged, so were only referred to as FIX, HFIX and LFX.

a,b,c were only used up to and including the V's. After that there was only ever an e suffix.

There were also a small number of low back LF.IXe's.

The 2 prefix on the Merlin applied to all Merlins manufactured outside the UK and was used long before the Merlin 266.

The tooling issue was resolved by designating Spit IX's with a Merlin 266 as Spit XVI's. Not by the 2 prefix on the engine.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
Asus M3N-HT mobo
2 x 2Gb Corsair 1066 DDR2 memory

Offline stodd

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #11 on: May 25, 2010, 06:29:39 PM »
-1. We have enough.
Stodd/ CandyMan
I don't get why you even typed that, you know it's stupid.


Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2010, 07:52:22 PM »
-1. We have enough.
Your signature says your the candy man....can I have some candy?    :noid
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #13 on: May 25, 2010, 10:38:14 PM »
I was curious about the number of spits produced with bubble canopies. All I could find easily was 'many' with bubble canopies were produced. I also found they produced 1054 XVI's. It appears that the Mk XVIe had the bubble canopy. See TD 248 photo @ DUXFORD:
http://wapedia.mobi/en/Supermarine_Spitfire_(late_Merlin_powered_variants)?t=3.#4.



'The Mk XVI was the same as the Mk IX in nearly all respects except for the engine, a Merlin 266. The Merlin 266 was the Merlin 66 and was built under licence in the USA by the Packard Motor Company. The "2" was added as a suffix in order to avoid confusion with the engines, as they required different tooling. All Mk XVI aircraft produced were of the Low-Altitude Fighter (LF) variety. This was not determined by the length of the wings (clipped wings were fitted to most LF Spitifres), but by the engine, which had been optimised for low-altitude operation. All production Mk XVIs had clipped wings for low altitude work and were fitted with the rear fuselage fuel tanks with a combined capacity of 75 gal [32] . Many XVIs featured cut-down rear fuselages with "bubble" canopies. On these aircraft the rear fuselage tank capacity was limited to 66 gal [32] .'

If you wanted to you could count the number of XVIe'S that were built. http://www.spitfires.ukf.net/p110.htm I would guess that the war ended when Japan surrendered? So anything before than would have been built before the end of the war. ( the initial announcement of Japan's surrender was made in the afternoon of August 15, 1945 in Japan). My assumption is XVIe means with bubble canopy.

Not sure the criteria used in selecting aircraft. We have Sea Fire Mk II while the superior Mk III was produced in higher numbers.

I just thing the bubble canopy would be cool looking.

Infidelz




Bubble canopy Spits only got into the game in late March-April 45 as the war was ending.  While it might be a nice novelty to have in the MAs, I'd prefer HTC spends the time on other birds first as performance isn't going to change on the Spits due to the bubble canopy.  I love Spits and will always hope for the Spit XII and for Kev to get his Seafire III, but they're way down the list with so many other birds needing to be done first.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: Spitty Mk XVI E
« Reply #14 on: May 25, 2010, 10:42:26 PM »
Bubble canopy Spits only got into the game in late March-April 45 as the war was ending.  While it might be a nice novelty to have in the MAs, I'd prefer HTC spends the time on other birds first as performance isn't going to change on the Spits due to the bubble canopy.  I love Spits and will always hope for the Spit XII and for Kev to get his Seafire III, but they're way down the list with so many other birds needing to be done first.
When you say other planes you mean the Beaufighter right :)
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek