Author Topic: US evaluation of T34-76 in 1942  (Read 3737 times)

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: US evaluation of T34-76 in 1942
« Reply #75 on: May 31, 2010, 08:52:21 AM »
Nice slab sides on the M1 Abrams and Leopard 2.

No modern tank that I know of uses coil springs in its suspension.
Side skirt armore is not slab sides. Abrams and Leopard II have a very low profile and sloped composite armor.
http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/Abrams_Pics/M1A1-Abrams-USMC-01.jpg
http://homepage.eircom.net/~steven/images/leopard2tank-14.jpg


If you're talking about the christie suspension system it's a little more complex than "springs" but you are right, modern tanks don't use it...because the christie suspension is too fragile for a 45ton to 67ton tank that can travel ~40mph off road. 



Nice try though.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: US evaluation of T34-76 in 1942
« Reply #76 on: May 31, 2010, 10:52:20 AM »
Where is the sloped side armour?

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: US evaluation of T34-76 in 1942
« Reply #77 on: May 31, 2010, 04:37:43 PM »
Where is the sloped side armour?
Low profile hull, large turret...guess where the sloped side armor is. High tech composite armor is also used, all over the tank. Weakest spot is on top of the turret.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett