Well, to begin with, I am against having jet fighters in the game. Although I know they will come in if HTC deems it so, and the vast majority of players seem to support it, I think it is a bad idea, for a few reasons.
1. The conditions that prompted their existance do NOT exist in the MA. The german jet fighters were designed to attack large formations of bombers, moving in one direction, at high altitude. The largest formation I have ever seen, personally, in the MA, was about 12 B-17s with fighter escort. They were on the deck, in an attempt to make a NOE raid. The raid was shot to pieces (but it was hella fun, that was pretty cool). Nine times out of ten, bombers fly in "formations" of less than 3 bombers. Probably eight times out of ten, it is a solo bomber, with no escort. A jet fighter would be absolutely useless against a single bomber, its speed would literally work against it. The bomber would have no problem manuevering out of the line of attack, the jet would be merely a nuisance. The jet could slow down to 250 mph, but it would wallow like a pig, and it would be quite vulnerable to not only the buff, but to any enemy fighters that happened to wander by. Since the jet fighters would (more than likely) be very expensive perk-wise, I don't think anyone would take a chance and slow down to the point where they could manuever with the bomber.
2. Since the Germans would have jets, which of course everyone would think were "super leet" (even though they are in actuality quite useless), the Allies would press for more advanced planes with which to run the jets down with. These planes would be the 1945-1946 planes that never saw action (with the exception of the 47n [or M, can't remember]. So the customers that enjoy flying non-allied planes would be relegated to flying obsolete planes, much like "early-war" planes that are in the set right now. While it is quite likely that these new planes would be perked as well, they would not be as heavily perked as the jet fighters, even though they would still be quite useful in the MA. I think this would lead to more than a little frustration amoung us "limpwristed Luftwhiners", and possibly some others as well.
I'll have to add more numbers later, I can't think of any right now. Feel free to add your comments for or against jet fighters, or anything else.
On a totally unrelated note (well, not really, since it came to me while typing this out)- I want to ask a question. For all the gnashing of teeth over the number of planes per country, why does it really matter? The Japanese "plane-set" consists of 3 planes- only 1 of which sees a lot of regular use. I am sure I don't have to tell you which one. The Russian plane-set consists of 3 planes, only 1 of which sees any regular use (though the Yak is catching on, I've been flying it a little myself- nice plane). The British plane-set consists of .. hum. Help me out here- 6 planes? 7? Again, only one of which sees any regular use. Taken together, those 3 plane sets have 3 of the 6 most often used planes in the game, not to shabby as far as I am concerned. Anyways, to continue. The Germans have 9 planes (I think), only 2 of them see any regular use. The Americans have a bunch to (9 as well?), only one of which sees a lot of use- unless you count in the C-Hog, then it would be two. Actually, the D hog sees a fair amount of use as well, so maybe we can say 2 American planes, and 3 with the C-hog.
As far as "diversity" goes- that is a fat load of garbage as far as I am concerned. There will be no diversity in the MA - EVER. Actually, that is not *quite* true. You will always have individuals who enjoy flying a particular plane, because they happen to like the plane. I know that is why I fly the LW birds - not because they are the best at anything, but because for some odd reason I enjoy flying them. I am sure the same holds true for probably 1% of the MA population. The other 99% fly a plane because it is the "best" at something (and this is pure supposition, not grounded in scientific fact at all). I can divide the population of the MA into 3 groups-
1. The Spits- The "best" turners.
2. The P51D,G10, and D9 - the "best" runners.
3. The Niki crowd - the "best" mix, in other words, the "best" or "most superior" plane there is, in the plane set. The C-Hog crowd fits into this category as well, before the perking of the plane.
The 1% that I see as different I'm not even going to bother to classify, as I am not sure that I could. And before someone brings it up- yes, you can look at my stats. I DO have 20 kills in the Niki (I flew it for 2 days at the beginning of the tour, once I got tired of them shooting me down). I DO have about 20 kills in the 109G10. However, I don't RUN in the plane as is so common with G10,D9, and 51D pilots.
Furthermore, I DO have 30ish kills in the 190a8, which is hardly a common plane in the arena, and if you look at last tours stats, you'll see I flew the 190a5 and the 190a8 the vast majority of the time.
What I don't understand is why people think that adding different planes will add "diversity" to the MA- I don't think it will. Unless the new plane is faster than a G10,D9, or 51D; turns better than a spit, or can kill 80% of enemy planes 1v1 regardless of E state or pilot skill, it won't be used by 99% of the people in the MA.
Anyways, the time for my rambling has come to an end. I welcome all comments, and I <S> anyone that read through the whole thing. If you have something to say, whether you agree or disagree, let me know. Nothing makes me feel better than a long thread that I started (makes me feel important, hehe

) <S> all, g'night.