Author Topic: General Stanley McChrystal  (Read 1372 times)

Offline Delirium

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7276
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2010, 11:00:20 AM »
The President can remove any General at any time, for any reason.

At times it can be a difficult and politically unsuccessful choice (see Truman/MacArthur), but you cannot have a General undermining the CiC in any fashion.

Real warriors and politicians are at totally opposite ends of the spectrum.  Always have been, always will be.

Unfortunately, that is true.
Delirium
80th "Headhunters"
Retired AH Trainer (but still teach the P38 selectively)

I found an air leak in my inflatable sheep and plugged the hole! Honest!

Offline fbWldcat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #16 on: June 23, 2010, 11:31:56 AM »
:lol you've never been in the military huh?  The good general will be lucky if he's not brought up on charges. Military Code of Conduct apply to service personal not the Bill Of Rights.

I know enough about the military.  :lol

Yeah, sadly.
Landing is overrated.
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I: I took the one less traveled by." - Robert Frost
"Uncommon valor was a common virtue." <S>

Offline soda72

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5201
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #17 on: June 23, 2010, 01:22:51 PM »

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #18 on: June 23, 2010, 01:30:45 PM »
The replacement was a foregone conclusion. The capper on the situation was announcing that he had already had his resignation ready for submission. It remains to be seen whether this was a calculated move on the part of the General or a simple lapse of judgement. Given that Rolling Stone confirmed remarks made by the General by asking for him to corroborate them prior to publishing I am not leaning in the lapse of judgement camp. He may have a significant job already lined up and took this method to get out of an untenable situation, working for the clueless on behalf of the hostile (afghans and congress) to benefit no one before it became impossible to leave without a stigma of defeat.

In short, he just simply had to know what effects his remarks would have and the almost certain result of making them for publication.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline soda72

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5201
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #19 on: June 23, 2010, 01:41:52 PM »
The replacement was a foregone conclusion.

yeah, if they had appointed anyone else they would have been consider a second stringer...


The capper on the situation was announcing that he had already had his resignation ready for submission. It remains to be seen whether this was a calculated move on the part of the General or a simple lapse of judgement. Given that Rolling Stone confirmed remarks made by the General by asking for him to corroborate them prior to publishing I am not leaning in the lapse of judgement camp. He may have a significant job already lined up and took this method to get out of an untenable situation, working for the clueless on behalf of the hostile (afghans and congress) to benefit no one before it became impossible to leave without a stigma of defeat.

In short, he just simply had to know what effects his remarks would have and the almost certain result of making them for publication.

I don't think he did this on purpose to move on to another job, otherwise why bother to apologize.  Turning in his resignation was a smart move on his part.  Now he can always say I didn't get fired I quit...

Offline RedTop

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5921
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #20 on: June 23, 2010, 06:55:31 PM »
Thanks General for your service...and speaking what alot think.
Original Member and Former C.O. 71 sqd. RAF Eagles

Offline FireDrgn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1115
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #21 on: June 23, 2010, 09:42:52 PM »
What makes your all think he didn't know exactly what he was saying and what the consequence would be.   
<S>
"When the student is ready the teacher will appear."   I am not a teacher.

Offline 68Hawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1365
      • 68th Lightning Lancers
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #22 on: June 24, 2010, 12:46:43 AM »
 :salute
68th Lightning Lancers
Fear the reaper no more fear the Lancers!
http://www.68thlightninglancers.net

Offline uptown

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8569
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #23 on: June 24, 2010, 03:36:05 AM »
What makes your all think he didn't know exactly what he was saying and what the consequence would be.   
<S>
That's what I think too. The man ain't stupid by any means. Maybe he wanted out and this was his way of doing it. The news said the the man hadn't seen his family for no more then 30 days at a time for the last 9 years. That alone would make me want to find a new gig.
Lighten up Francis

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #24 on: June 24, 2010, 07:44:00 AM »
That's what I think too. The man ain't stupid by any means. Maybe he wanted out and this was his way of doing it. The news said the the man hadn't seen his family for no more then 30 days at a time for the last 9 years. That alone would make me want to find a new gig.

30 days total in 9 years!? I wouldve claimed the cabinet members were raging homo's just on that basis to get out. That's horrible


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #25 on: June 24, 2010, 07:48:17 AM »
30 days at a time.

Whining Generals... Aren't we supposed to be at war?
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #26 on: June 24, 2010, 10:12:04 AM »
     Apparently only lawyers are allowed to be unhappy?
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #27 on: June 24, 2010, 12:32:12 PM »
30 days total in 9 years!? I wouldve claimed the cabinet members were raging homo's just on that basis to get out. That's horrible

He had more than enough time to qualify for retirement, There was no reason to go this route just to stack arms.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #28 on: June 24, 2010, 01:46:47 PM »
The actual article.

I think the reporter had an agenda and succeeded.  I also think the reporter with an agenda didn't care about the "big picture" in Afghanistan vis a vis strategy.


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27336
Re: General Stanley McChrystal
« Reply #29 on: June 24, 2010, 03:51:44 PM »
They replaced him with a man they called a liar not so long ago. Blind leading the blind.
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)