Author Topic: Short Stirling  (Read 1544 times)

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Short Stirling
« on: July 02, 2010, 03:41:05 PM »
In my opinion a good heavy bomber that could fit in all arenas.

Specifications:
Country of origin: UK
Crew: 7
Powerplant: 4 x 1375hp (1030kW) Bristol Hercules Radial Engines
Max Speed: 410km/h (255 Mph)
Range: 3750km (2330 miles)
Service Ceiling: 5030m (16,500 ft)
Weight: 22 Tons(Empty) 29.7 Tons (Loaded)
Max Weight: 35 Tons
Wingspan: 99'1''
Length: 87'3''
Height: 28'10''
Wing Area: 1322 ft2
Propellors: 3 Blade, 13'6'' diameter
Range: 2330 miles
Wing Loading: 44.9 lb/ft2

Armament:
8 x 7.7mm Brownings, 2 nose, four tail, 2 dorsal
14,000-18,000lb Bombload

Total Produced: ~2,300 units
« Last Edit: July 02, 2010, 03:42:45 PM by Pigslilspaz »

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2010, 04:41:24 PM »
I would like the Short Stirling, it would be great for the early and mid-war arenas but it really doesn't bring anything to the table that other more capable planes do like the Lancaster or even the Mosquito.

It was only capable of carrying a maximum bomb payload for short distances only, think under 600 miles.  For long range missions into Italy and Germany, it usually carried a 3,500lbs payload.  Because of the way the bomb bay was designed, the largest bomb it could carry was a 2,000lbs bomb.  It's thick wings also gave it very poor high altitude performance, so much so that majority of the missions were flown at medium to low altitudes.  One benefit though was reported about the thick wings, pilots supposedly reported that they were able to out turn the Ju88 and Bf 110 night fighters they encountered.  After 1943, the Short Stirling was almost exclusively delegated to secondary duties like troops transport and tow plane for gliders.

Having said that, I think it still can have a little niche in this game as an early war bomber in the early war arena and, if it's possible, in the late war it could be given the option of being able to transport troops.  The Mk. IV was used to drop paratroopers and as a tow plane and was armed with a tail gun and was used to drop British airborne troops and tow gliders during D-Day and Market Garden.  It would give another airborne troop transport and one that had some defensive capabilities. 


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2010, 07:25:24 PM »
I totally forgot about the troop capabilities. Also, I don't think the gliders would be a go, do to them not being on the C-47. Thanks for reminding me of the troops, lol

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Clone155

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2010, 07:39:08 PM »
How many troops could it carry? 10 or above? This might replace the C-47!

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2010, 07:42:47 PM »
Chances are, it would only be 10 in game. HT said that if anything can carry more than 10 troops, he'll raise capture amount to that. The C-47 could actually carry 26 troops if I remember correctly.

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2010, 07:48:01 PM »
Troops as a "perked ordinance" option?

I think it is too slow and under-armed to be very viable in the LWAs, but the MWA and especially the EWA could use some variety.  And a slower bomber that the EW planes could actually catch would be a definite bonus.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline Clone155

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2010, 08:01:09 PM »
Chances are, it would only be 10 in game. HT said that if anything can carry more than 10 troops, he'll raise capture amount to that. The C-47 could actually carry 26 troops if I remember correctly.

Yes I know. The reason I ask is because if it only carried like 5, that would be lame.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2010, 10:22:09 PM »
The wing span was limited on the Stirling due to the width of RAF Hangers.  Lets just say it cost the Stirling.  The Halifax and Lanc guys loved knowing the Stirlings were up as they would be the ones to get hit lower down.

Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2010, 01:19:16 AM »
Yes I know. The reason I ask is because if it only carried like 5, that would be lame.

Not sure of the exact number but it was more than what is necessary to capture a town in AH.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #9 on: July 04, 2010, 12:10:50 PM »
Not sure of the exact number but it was more than what is necessary to capture a town in AH.

ack-ack

... as is the same with the M3 (12), the C-47 (28 paras?), and LVT-2 (18). 

I wish HTC would let those units carry the amount of troops they actually could carry.  Why limit them to just 10?       
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17417
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #10 on: July 04, 2010, 12:40:54 PM »
Because then the troops needed to capture base would increase to whatever is the max plane/gv can carry.



Semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #11 on: July 06, 2010, 01:13:51 AM »
I don't want this just for the fact that it carried goons, and I hope that this thread doesnt derail like that. In all honesty, even if there were no goons, it would still be a great bomber.

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #12 on: July 06, 2010, 12:26:13 PM »
I don't want this just for the fact that it carried goons, and I hope that this thread doesnt derail like that. In all honesty, even if there were no goons, it would still be a great bomber.

It would be a good early war addition as a bomber but the fact that it was able to carry a load of paratroopers helps its cause because it can be used in two roles.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2010, 01:58:16 AM »
It would be a good early war addition as a bomber but the fact that it was able to carry a load of paratroopers helps its cause because it can be used in two roles.

ack-ack

thats true. Im suprised nobody else has shown this much interest.

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Short Stirling
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2010, 03:53:42 AM »
thats true. Im suprised nobody else has shown this much interest.

Because it doesn't fly at 357mph, carry 20,000 worth of bombs or made after mid-1944.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song