Author Topic: Must be a relative of S-hawk!  (Read 1342 times)

Offline mtnman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2438
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2010, 06:10:13 AM »
In 1979 I worked on the river in La Crosse, I would hardly ever see a bald eagle. The species has really made a come back. In the early ninties I really noticed how the numbers I could count in spring and fall went up.

Couple years ago, I was going by a part of the river, the ice was breaking up, spring of course, and must of counted between 25 to 30 in one area.

Yea, they've really made a come-back! 

Last fall I spent about 4 hours in a blind on a ridge overlooking the river.  It was a pretty good day for migrating, and the birds were using the lift generated along the ridge as they moved to the south.  In those few hours we saw over 80 redtails (which is what we were really looking for), several coopers and sharp-shinned hawks, and many bald eagles.  We actually got kind of bored with the eagles, and quit counting them when we hit 300 (it's like a conveyor belt of birds moving from north to south along the ridges).  We were really hoping to see a golden, but only saw adult and immature balds.  It would have been neat to see a few peregrines too, but we didn't.  I've actually seen three peregrines in the Appleton/Oshkosh area during fall migration.
MtnMan

"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not". Thomas Jefferson

Offline CHAPPY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2010, 10:14:14 AM »

Offline Sincraft

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 691
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2010, 11:53:57 AM »

Offline NaTorino

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 436
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2010, 12:11:22 PM »
great story 99  :aok  :salute

Offline bagrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1936
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2010, 12:33:21 PM »
did u say mach 1.5 eagles! damm thing coulda takin out an airliner, an not by goin into a engine but by simply beasting through the  fuselage and it would probable survive.
Last post by bagrat - The last thing you'll see before your thread dies since 2005.

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2010, 12:52:47 PM »
mach 1.5 is just to describe it went really fast.
no bird can fly or dive that fast.


Offline SHawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1031
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2010, 01:34:56 PM »
LOL! and my wifes name is Robin, you don't wanna mess with her either!

We have a few redtails living near the house here also. A Few times I've seen em land in the back yard with about 20 robins in tow. Usually with one of em in it's talons. The other 20 are trying desperately to free the victim to no avail. :aok


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXLZeL59gfc&NR=1&feature=fvwp <<--My Favorite Band

If it takes full power to taxi to the hanger, your gear is probably up.

Offline K-KEN

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 874
      • http://www.cutthroats.com
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2010, 01:53:31 PM »
Great stories all!   :O

Offline greens

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1413
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2010, 08:46:42 PM »
sounds like shawk against the jokers, hmmm i wonder whod the bait be>  :huh
_-=ELIM EAGLES=-_
in loving memory of OZ <Eagles21>
 miss you bro!

Offline SunBat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2103
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2010, 10:08:31 PM »
The second eagle was definately a relative of Shawk - use a squaddie as bait, swoop in, get a couple of picks.  The only difference is eagle #2 actually left one for eagle #1. :D
AoM
Do not get caught up in the country-centric thinking.
The great thing about irony is that it splits things apart, gets up above them so we can see the flaws and hypocrisies and duplicates. - David Foster Walla

Offline froger

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
frogs are people too

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #26 on: July 12, 2010, 06:07:11 AM »
If you eat meat from the grocery store, or at a restaurant, you're a scavenger. 

Bald eagles get much of their food through scavenging, goldens don't scavenge quite as much.  Regardless, killing the crows, and then eating them is not an example of scavenging. 
technically... no. you are not a scavenger. The food we buy at the store or eat at a restaurant is not discarded. we buy it therefore it was meant to be given to us to eat (a baby bird does not scavenge out of a mother bird, the mother feeds them. <- could be used as an example to back my statement up). if we were eating out of someone's garbage can, then we'd be scavengers. The fact that our food was meant to be eaten whether we killed it or not means we are not scavengers at all. <S>
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline SunBat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2103
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #27 on: July 12, 2010, 11:38:15 AM »
technically... no. you are not a scavenger. The food we buy at the store or eat at a restaurant is not discarded. we buy it therefore it was meant to be given to us to eat (a baby bird does not scavenge out of a mother bird, the mother feeds them. <- could be used as an example to back my statement up). if we were eating out of someone's garbage can, then we'd be scavengers. The fact that our food was meant to be eaten whether we killed it or not means we are not scavengers at all. <S>

We'll argue about anything around here won't we?
AoM
Do not get caught up in the country-centric thinking.
The great thing about irony is that it splits things apart, gets up above them so we can see the flaws and hypocrisies and duplicates. - David Foster Walla

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10165
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #28 on: July 12, 2010, 12:23:12 PM »
Watched a bald eagle recently fly near our house with a baby crow in its claws....quite alive too.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline mtnman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2438
Re: Must be a relative of S-hawk!
« Reply #29 on: July 12, 2010, 03:50:28 PM »
We'll argue about anything around here won't we?

Heck yea! 

It could be worse though...  We could be arguing about HOing, or ganging, or NOEing, or furballing, or tool-shedding, or...
MtnMan

"Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not". Thomas Jefferson