« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Port Strat  (Read 834 times)

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4056
      • Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group
Re: Port Strat
« Reply #15 on: August 12, 2010, 07:32:21 AM »
I agree with being able to bomb any deep target valuable enough that people realize they are about to lose something very tangible (more tangible than radar, ord, barracks) if they don't defend against the offensive force.
Logged
Operations Officer - Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group
C.O.: EZGlider
X.O.: Steely
Just a bunch of old farts having a great time raining destruction down upon the enemy.
https://www.dickweedhbg.com/

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Port Strat
« Reply #16 on: August 12, 2010, 08:51:33 AM »
Only if it affected the ability to spawn CV groups and or some sort of supply system, and it would have to be large complex.


Mannable puffy ack emplacements would be cool for any of the strats too.
Logged
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline RufusLeaking

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1056
Re: Port Strat
« Reply #17 on: August 12, 2010, 09:26:23 AM »
Quote from: Bruv119 on August 11, 2010, 03:24:56 PM
+1 

same goes for some sort of Railyard,  train factory. 
To expand it further, how about a supply network of factories, convoys, ports, railroads, rail yards, etc?  The open question is how this would affect gameplay.
Logged
GameID: RufLeak
Claim Jumpers
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »