Panzer VI Ausf. B Tiger II (aka King Tiger)

[JBJB710]

Do you think you can add this vehicle into the game:

Called the Panzer VI Ausf. B Tiger II (aka Tiger II, Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger Ausf. B , Tiger B, Königstiger (German for "Bengal tiger"), King Tiger, or Royal Tiger)

[Karnak]

Because we need a full 50% of our tanks to be perk tanks....

[Nemisis]

why is it that no one seems to want some EW and MW tanks ?


Your wish has merit, and I would like to See the Koinstiger some day, but not now.

What I would like to see before this is a very extensive list, something we can use for EW/MW scenarios, with some LW vehicles that would (IMO) take precedence over the Koinstiger:


Tanks

Panzer III Ausf E
Panzer III Ausf H
Panzer III Ausf L
Panzer IV Ausf E
Panzer IV Ausf G
Matilda
Cromwell Mk IV
Churchill Mk III
Churchill Mk VIII
M3 Stuart

Tank Destroyers/Self propelled guns

StuG III Ausf D
Stug III Ausf G
Marder II
Archer
M3A1 75mm GMC/T-48 57mm GMC
SdKfz 251/22
Hetzer
M36 Slugger
M18 Hellcat

[perdue3]

Tiger is beast in game now, absolutely no competition for King Tiger so I wouldnt expect to ever see it.


perdweeb

[Nemisis]

Up close, the Tiger I and Sherman Firefly could kill it. At any real range though, another tiger II is the only thing that could kill it from the front, asside from the 190F8, and other large ord carriers.

When/if we get it, I say it be given a price of 75 perks at least, if not 100 or 125. Hell, maybe even 150 would be needed. What the 262 is for aircraft, the Tiger II is for tanks.

[Pigslilspaz]

262 has 200 perks. I say do that.

[drfritz]

i like to see no icon range for gvs gone or cut in half 1st. and same for gvs to air cons. sure make gving a hole new ball of wax.( frendly icon range stays the same) would work both ways

[oakranger]

Tiger is beast in game now, absolutely no competition for King Tiger so I wouldnt expect to ever see it.


perdweeb

My P-47d-25 will take care of the king tiger. 

[321BAR]

My P-47d-25 will take care of the king tiger. 

agreed...

By the way, since ranger's map went into the AvA, i've been wanting to see more Pnzr IIIs and Crusaders than anything else with a turret... EXCEPT for the M-18

[Pigslilspaz]

agreed...

By the way, since ranger's map went into the AvA, i've been wanting to see more Pnzr IIIs and Crusaders than anything else with a turret... EXCEPT for the M-18

Quick! someone hacked 321's account!

[Nemisis]

i like to see no icon range for gvs gone or cut in half 1st. and same for gvs to air cons. sure make gving a hole new ball of wax.( frendly icon range stays the same) would work both ways

GV's cant even SEE an enemy GV's icon. And how would the reduced ground to air icon range work? You're sitting in a tank which is much more stable than a plane, the commander likely has a pair of binoculars, and the gunner has a telescopic sight. Seems like it would be EASIER to identify aircraft from a GV than from another aircraft.

[phatzo]

If you get the king tiger. I want this.

[kilo2]

If you get the king tiger. I want this.
(Image removed from quote.)

YES with a better gun though.

[oakranger]

Quick! someone hacked 321's account!

No need to. I will just kill is M-18 in my P-47D-25 too.   

[321BAR]

No need to. I will just kill is M-18 in my P-47D-25 too.