Author Topic: Submarine Aircraft Carriers  (Read 1351 times)

Offline JBJB710

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54
Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« on: September 20, 2010, 12:48:30 AM »
What do you say, do you think there should be Submarine Aircraft Carriers in Aces High as well,
like the I-400 class submarine

but can only carry Aichi M6A Seiran.
Cipher (a.k.a. "The Demon Lord")
108th Tactical Fighter Squadron
"Wardog Squadron"

Offline curry1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2321
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2010, 12:49:28 AM »
I'm glad it saw combat... wait a second...
Curry1-Since Tour 101

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2010, 07:28:28 AM »
     Pretty big wish, first to recode the game to allow submarines to submerge, then a floatplane with
folding everything and a small bombload.  Sounds like alot of work.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2010, 09:14:01 AM »
       Just happened to find a model of it on Model Warships site, it does look pretty  :D

80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2010, 11:22:18 AM »
Perk the hell out of it!
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #5 on: September 21, 2010, 11:25:25 AM »
hmmm....yeah..... no im not feeling it
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline 800nate

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 82
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2010, 01:28:34 PM »
dont perk it dont perk it dont perk it....wait a sec.... perking a n1k or a6m2 fro upping off a cv sub

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10196
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2010, 01:50:43 PM »
The only combat it saw was as torpedo practice for the US Navy.  After the war was over I might add. -1
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2010, 02:36:32 PM »
negatory.

never saw combat, excluding the times popeye the sailor attacked them with his sucker punch
having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2010, 02:48:30 PM »
It was a good idea, desinged to bomb targets in the US, but it was just one of those great things thought up in WW2 that never made it, however, they did have tanker submarines, which were use to refuel float planes on there way to bombing pearl harbour, so, in a compromise, once we even get opperational subs in AH, as well as floatplanes ie H8K2 there could be room for TG like subs that you could refuel from at sea, you have lots of unique ideas, and with a little refinement and a bit more research, I foresee that you will start to put out some unique ideas that no one has thought of before
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2010, 03:08:27 PM »
     Heard of U boat Milk Cows, didn't know about Japanese models.



80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline JOACH1M

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9813
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #11 on: September 21, 2010, 08:10:32 PM »
Noo don't wanna see any of those stupid things
FEW ~ BK's ~ AoM
Focke Wulf Me / Last Of The GOATS 🐐
ToC 2013 & 2017 Champ
R.I.P My Brothers <3

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #12 on: September 21, 2010, 08:48:57 PM »
dont perk it dont perk it dont perk it....wait a sec.... perking a n1k or a6m2 fro upping off a cv sub

English please.
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline JHerne

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 659
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #13 on: September 22, 2010, 11:46:48 AM »
If we're gonna wish, why not have the French Surcouf? French stuff is non-existant anyway...



A sub with 8" guns, ya, surface offshore, fire a few rounds, kill a shore battery, then submerge!!

Course, the only way to kill it is to run over it with a surface ship, the way the real Surcouf died  :salute, or to have your crew mutiny and country-hop to another side.

Tongue planted firmly in cheek (that means I'm not being serious)

J
Skunkworks AvA Researcher and
Primary Cause of Angst

Offline Mus51

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: Submarine Aircraft Carriers
« Reply #14 on: September 22, 2010, 12:02:48 PM »
I take it they could only submerge once the aircraft took off. What a piece of c***.
Regards,


DutchGuy